Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Juan, On 9/27/2010 8:32 AM, jmorati...@dit.upm.es wrote: > I have developed an application which instanciates a singleton class in > the init method of a servlet. This servlet is defined in the web.xml with > the 1 tag. This singleton class start a >

RE: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-28 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es] > Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread > I just want to restart one servlet, not all. Read the servlet spec: no such mechanism could possibly exist. As Pid suggests, rethink your application architecture.

Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-28 Thread Pid
nism that watches >>> a resource and does some internal reconfiguration when the resource >>> changes - but not a complete reload of the webapp. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Rainer >>> >>> >>>>> From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:

Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-28 Thread Pid
ression, you wanted to use a self-made mechanism that watches >> a resource and does some internal reconfiguration when the resource >> changes - but not a complete reload of the webapp. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> >> >>>&g

Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread jmoratilla
source >> changes - but not a complete reload of the webapp. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> >> >>>> From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es] >>>> Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread >>>&

Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread jmoratilla
es - but not a complete reload of the webapp. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > >>> From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es] >>> Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread >>> >>> >>> Here is the explanation I foun

Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread Rainer Jung
er From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es] Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread Here is the explanation I found: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html You can't seriously be using Tomcat 3.2, are you? That hasn't been sup

RE: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread jmoratilla
ailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es] > Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread > > > Here is the explanation I found: > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html > > You can't seriously be using Tomcat 3.2, are you? That hasn't been > supp

RE: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es] Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread Here is the explanation I found: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html You can't seriously be using Tomcat 3.2, are you? That hasn't been supp

Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread jmoratilla
I answer me: I'm using reloadable="true" in my context. Is that the reason a found this behaviour??? Am I right??? If I use reloadable="false" init method of servlets will not be executed, am I right??? Here is the explanation I found: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.ht

About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread

2010-09-27 Thread jmoratilla
Hi all, I have developed an application which instanciates a singleton class in the init method of a servlet. This servlet is defined in the web.xml with the 1 tag. This singleton class start a Thread which notifies the singleton class when a configuration file has changed. The thread checks if th