t; 5b0An0a1E4LPyrIVcREaBqt+deRvVsOa
> =bJY5
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> -------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darius,
On 7/18/2011 2:23 PM, Darius D. wrote:
> Does Tomcat APR really needs pollTime set so low by default? I
> thought timeout is meant for some sort of book keeping, where is all
> connections in FD set are "idle", no events come for timeout perio
> Does Tomcat APR really needs pollTime set so low by default?
Anyone care to comment on this point? I'm interested in this
discussion as a user of Linux+APR connectors. While we don't yet run
on a tickless kernel, I'm considering trying to measure the impact on
our systems as well, but some ins
/irqstats-week.png irqstats-week.png
So results are pretty obviuos.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/APR-connector-pollTime-defaults-are-strange-in-tomcat6-7-tp32085364p32115035.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
tes )
P.S. There exists perfect workaround in latest Tomcat7, using
protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol" and
protocol="org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpNioProtocol" for AJP will do away with
all unneeded context switches.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabb
