Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:56, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:42:36 +0200, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
Extract from the script (note that the server port is not randomized,
it should probably be):
Hi all,
Why do you want to go into such deep details, lik
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:56, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:42:36 +0200, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>
>> Extract from the script (note that the server port is not randomized,
>> it should probably be):
>
> Hi all,
>
> Why do you want to go into such deep details, like checking fo
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:42:36 +0200, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
Extract from the script (note that the server port is not randomized,
it should probably be):
Hi all,
Why do you want to go into such deep details, like checking for
particular ports to be opened?
I have httpd, mod_proxy_ajp and t
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:47, André Warnier wrote:
> Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:42, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> lsof -u $TOMCAT_USER -i tcp:8005 &>/dev/null
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, that's a non working version: forget the -u option. But with
>> o
Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:42, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
[...]
lsof -u $TOMCAT_USER -i tcp:8005 &>/dev/null
Sorry, that's a non working version: forget the -u option. But with
only the -i, it works.
Thanks, very useful. I'll try that.
---
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:42, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
[...]
>
> lsof -u $TOMCAT_USER -i tcp:8005 &>/dev/null
>
Sorry, that's a non working version: forget the -u option. But with
only the -i, it works.
--
Francis Galiegue
ONE2TEAM
Ingénieur système
Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875
Tel
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:27, André Warnier wrote:
> Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
[...]
>
> Yes, that would be more reliable than my 2 seconds above.
> Although if one really wanted to split hairs in 4 parts (lenghtwise), one
> could argue that the fact that the port mentioned in is open and
> listen
Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:48, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
The problem can also be due just to the difference in startup time between
Apache httpd and Tomcat. At the time Apache httpd (and its embedded
mod_proxy_ajp module) try to contact Tomcat, Tomcat has possibly not y
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:48, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The problem can also be due just to the difference in startup time between
> Apache httpd and Tomcat. At the time Apache httpd (and its embedded
> mod_proxy_ajp module) try to contact Tomcat, Tomcat has possibly not yet
> "opened" its
Hi.
The problem can also be due just to the difference in startup time between Apache httpd
and Tomcat. At the time Apache httpd (and its embedded mod_proxy_ajp module) try to
contact Tomcat, Tomcat has possibly not yet "opened" its Connector on port 8009, which
causes the host to refuse a co
I uninstalled Tomcat and installed a newer version (6.0.33) and the problem
disappeared. It is strange because the config files are the same.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:16 AM, wrote:
> Hi
> >
> > I get the following AJP errors when I try to access a webpage after
> ztarting
> > Apache and Tomcat.
Hi
>
> I get the following AJP errors when I try to access a webpage after
ztarting
> Apache and Tomcat. Both Apache web server and Tomcat start up fine
> but I get these errors in Apache logs and I get a 503 Service
> Temporarily Unavailable message in the browser. Apparently Tomcat
> isn't s
Hi,
I get the following AJP errors when I try to access a webpage after starting
Apache and Tomcat. Both Apache web server and Tomcat start up fine but I get
these errors in Apache logs and I get a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable
message in the browser. Apparently Tomcat isn't seeing the reque
13 matches
Mail list logo
