-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jukka,
On 2/28/13 4:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 2/25/13 12:52 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>> A question related to pools. Background: a big application in
>> which it is preferable to enforce different roles for different
>> databases and t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jukka,
On 2/25/13 12:52 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> A question related to pools. Background: a big application in which
> it is preferable to enforce different roles for different databases
> and tables. This implies that there are different user na
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:33:28AM -0500, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> Personally, what would worry me the most about this setup is configuring
> and tuning each of the pools. Since they are all going to the same DB, I
> wouldn't want to overload the system with too many connection, but at the
> same ti
On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> A question related to pools. Background: a big application in which it is
> preferable to enforce different roles for different databases and tables.
> This implies that there are different user names and passwords for different
> c
Hello.
A question related to pools. Background: a big application in which it is
preferable to enforce different roles for different databases and tables.
This implies that there are different user names and passwords for different
connections. As I understand, there are two options for connectio
