On 15/07/2013 20:09, Andrew Kujtan wrote:
> When you say resource handling are you referring to serving files from
> within a jars' META-INF/resource folder?
Yes, and more. See the Tomcat docs from the CI system for details:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/docs/config/resources.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>
> On 15/07/2013 17:17, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
>
On 15/07/2013 17:17, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>>
>> ...I'd encourage you to grab the 8.0.x source, built it and try out the new
>> resource h
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>
>...I'd encourage you to grab the 8.0.x source, built it and try out the new
>resource handling. Feedback welcome.
>From here?
http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/
On 15/07/2013 15:38, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
>> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>>
>> I'd prefer to see a clearer requirement for it from the user base
>
> What about a single site with
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>
>I'd prefer to see a clearer requirement for it from the user base
What about a single site with multiple webapps all laid out with the same
header/footer, left/right naviga
On 15/07/2013 10:38, Rainer Frey wrote:
>
> On 11.07.2013, at 17:36, André Warnier wrote:
>
>> Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
>>> You mention header/footers, which was in the back of my mind when
>>> I posted this. Placing headers/footers in WEB-INF doesn't allow
>>> me to re-use these in differe
On 11.07.2013, at 17:36, André Warnier wrote:
> Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
>> You mention header/footers, which was in the back of my mind when I posted
>> this. Placing headers/footers in WEB-INF doesn't allow me to re-use these
>> in different webapps, without having multiple copies of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 7/11/13 11:36 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
>>> -Original Message- From: Tim Funk
>>> [mailto:funk...@apache.org] Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>>>
>>> Its a best pr
Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Funk [mailto:funk...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF. Since WEB-INF/ is not
allowed to be requested by the browser - its a simple enforcement
mechanism to pr
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Funk [mailto:funk...@apache.org]
>Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
>
>Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF. Since WEB-INF/ is not
>allowed to be requested by the browser - its a simple enforcement
>mechanism to prevent u
Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF. Since WEB-INF/ is
not allowed to be requested by the browser - its a simple enforcement
mechanism to prevent users from direct access to calling jsps. (Since it
may be common to have jsp's as snippets for header / footers etc -- and
there fo
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 15:08 -0700, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
> When did it start that developers decided to place jsps in the WEB-INF
> directory? Was that intended from the beginning, or was it stumbled
> upon?
My guess is that it was a side effect of MVC adoption -- making views
accessible o
When did it start that developers decided to place jsps in the WEB-INF
directory? Was that intended from the beginning, or was it stumbled upon?
Leo
14 matches
Mail list logo
