Re: [OT] Top posting (was RE: question)

2006-01-04 Thread Bjørge Solli
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:31, George Sexton wrote: > Since most people use threaded mail readers that go from oldest to newest, > this isn't much of a problem for most people. > > You should look for a better mail reader. I'm sorry. What was not a problem? My mailreader uses threads. Ok, seri

RE: [OT] Top posting (was RE: question)

2006-01-03 Thread Peter Crowther
> From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Since most people use threaded mail readers that go from oldest to newest, > this isn't much of a problem for most people. ... I'm sorry? Which 'this' were you referring to here? It wasn't in context, so I'm afraid I can't tell for sure. I'll

RE: [OT] Top posting (was RE: question)

2006-01-03 Thread George Sexton
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:35 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: [OT] Top posting (was RE: question) > > > From: Carl Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A lot of people on this forum Top Post. > > > > Is

Re: [OT] Top posting (was RE: question)

2006-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Hackl
Peter Crowther wrote: From: Carl Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A lot of people on this forum Top Post. Is this really such a big issue? I can sum it up with the following quote: -- snip -- A: Top posting. Q: What's the most confusing thing about mailing list messages? -- snip --

[OT] Top posting (was RE: question)

2006-01-03 Thread Peter Crowther
> From: Carl Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > A lot of people on this forum Top Post. > > Is this really such a big issue? I can sum it up with the following quote: -- snip -- A: Top posting. Q: What's the most confusing thing about mailing list messages? -- snip -- If I'm reading through