Re: [OT] ThreadLocal fixes in log4j|commons-logging

2010-11-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark, On 11/29/2010 12:37 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 29/11/2010 17:29, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> All, >> >> At some point, someone (markt?) mentioned that, as a result of Tomcat's >> memory leak detection capabilities, either log4j or commons-log

Re: [OT] ThreadLocal fixes in log4j|commons-logging

2010-11-29 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/11/2010 17:37, Mark Thomas wrote: > The commons logging issue was an open JAR file: Doh. I meant log4j. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.a

Re: [OT] ThreadLocal fixes in log4j|commons-logging

2010-11-29 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/11/2010 17:29, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > At some point, someone (markt?) mentioned that, as a result of Tomcat's > memory leak detection capabilities, either log4j or commons-logging (or > both) had fixed at least one ThreadLocal issue. > > I was wondering if someone could post

[OT] ThreadLocal fixes in log4j|commons-logging

2010-11-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, At some point, someone (markt?) mentioned that, as a result of Tomcat's memory leak detection capabilities, either log4j or commons-logging (or both) had fixed at least one ThreadLocal issue. I was wondering if someone could post a reference for

[OT] ThreadLocal fixes in log4j|commons-logging

2010-11-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, At some point, someone (markt?) mentioned that, as a result of Tomcat's memory leak detection capabilities, either log4j or commons-logging (or both) had fixed at least one ThreadLocal issue. I was wondering if someone could post a reference for