Re: [OT] Security of AJP

2018-02-28 Thread Olaf Kock
On 28.02.2018 16:01, Cheltenham, Chris wrote: In this case are you tunneling into tomcat via 8009 AJP connector? "tunneling the (unencrypted) AJP connection between Apache httpd and Tomcat, so that it's no longer transmitted in clear text." - that's how I'd phrase it. (and thank you Chris

RE: [OT] Security of AJP

2018-02-28 Thread Cheltenham, Chris
...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:37 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: [OT] Security of AJP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Olaf, On 2/28/18 2:46 AM, Olaf Kock wrote: > On 27.02.2018 23:18, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE

Re: [OT] Security of AJP

2018-02-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Olaf, On 2/28/18 2:46 AM, Olaf Kock wrote: > On 27.02.2018 23:18, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> Olaf, >> >> On 2/27/18 4:33 PM, Olaf Kock wrote: >>> On 27.02.2018 21:54, Mark A. Claassen wrote:

Re: [OT] Security of AJP

2018-02-27 Thread Olaf Kock
Hi Christopher, On 27.02.2018 23:18, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Olaf, On 2/27/18 4:33 PM, Olaf Kock wrote: On 27.02.2018 21:54, Mark A. Claassen wrote: I would /not/ state that it's /not secure/. But I'm following your later argument: It's an "

Re: [OT] Security of AJP

2018-02-27 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Olaf, On 2/27/18 4:33 PM, Olaf Kock wrote: > On 27.02.2018 21:54, Mark A. Claassen wrote: >> From what I have read, it seems that the AJP connector is not >> secure, and is meant to be used in a protective environment. >> There are lots of things th