nd so on.
>
Absolutely. Not everyone needs to protect their Web apps.
Dmitry
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Jeffrey Janner [SMTP:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:09 AM
> >> To:Tomc
From: Jeffrey Janner [SMTP:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:09 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [OT] Securing Tomcat Applications from Reverse Engineering
Good points all around. We had the same issues with our CEO worrying
t Users List; Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Securing Tomcat Applications from Reverse Engineering
>
> Good points all around. We had the same issues with our CEO worrying about
> copies of the app being passed around when we started targeting markets where
> piracy is fai
ssage-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Securing Tomcat Applications from Reverse Engineering
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> André -
> Welcome to the world of small business, for-profit software development
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
André -
Welcome to the world of small business, for-profit software development.
This is a more common attitude that you might be aware.
I was being somewhat ironic. Being myself a small for-profit software
development business, I am well aware of the circumstances.
;-)
Kranti™ K K Parisa wrote:
Well there are soo many comments on the cost of IP and other tools. when we
are a small team started working on a web based product with open source
tools, for sure we can't spend too much on the tools to protect the IP
rights. because once we deploy for few clients, if
