Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter, On 10/29/2009 4:16 AM, Peter Crowther wrote: > More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing > a little work in a language that is reasonably "close to the metal" > gives an insight into how the machine actually works, w

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Warren Pace
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Warren Pace wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R >> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] >>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread André Warnier
Warren Pace wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R : >> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com >> That's not even a "modern" stored-program computer! > > Just because it used relays as the logic elements? Hmm. I started writing a response here along the lines of "because it didn't keep the code in main memory", then

RE: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com > [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values > > That's not even a "modern" stored-program computer! Just because it used relays as the logic elements? It

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R : > Univac 1004: 961 *6-bit* bytes of core memory, programmed via squids on a > plugboard.  Handled punch cards, paper tape, and printing; tape drive > optional (we didn't have one).  Had a tendency to throw cards all over the > room if not handled properly. > >  

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Warren Pace
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] >> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values >> >> As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the >> judicious and parcimonious us

RE: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values > > As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the > judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted data structures, on a > computer with 16 Kb of RAM and punched

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread warren . pace
I was the happiest man in the world when they delivered our shiny new System/34. No more punch cards! --Original Message-- From: André Warnier To: Tomcat Users List ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values Sent: Oct 29, 2009 5:08

Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread André Warnier
Peter Crowther wrote: 2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz : Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java. ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-) More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing a little wo

[OT] Re: So many timeout values

2009-10-29 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz : > Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you > really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java. ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-) More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing a little work in a language that