Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Paul Benedict
By the way, I should mention that with Apache AJP in front of a container, this kind of partial matching stuff gets really interesting. :-) Cheers, Paul On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Yes, I gave them the same example I used here. They confirmed it is > "overlapping".

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Paul Benedict
Yes, I gave them the same example I used here. They confirmed it is "overlapping". Here is the example again: /context/something <-- context is /context /context/something/somethingelse <-- context is /context/something Cheers, Paul On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:34 AM, David kerber wrote: > On 3/

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread David kerber
On 3/22/2016 12:31 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: Mark, I did get some clarification. Thanks for asking. The EE spec states an "application" may not have overlapping context roots. I got clarification that "application" refers only to an EAR. Therefore, an EE server should be validating this condition

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Paul Benedict
Mark, I did get some clarification. Thanks for asking. The EE spec states an "application" may not have overlapping context roots. I got clarification that "application" refers only to an EAR. Therefore, an EE server should be validating this condition. So two inferences follow: 1) In the case of

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/03/2016 15:57, Paul Benedict wrote: > FYI, the EE spec lead and Servlet spec lead consulted. They said I should > log a ticket against the Servlet specification on this matter. That is > something I think I shall do. I found some wording in the specification > that should likely have more det

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Paul Benedict
FYI, the EE spec lead and Servlet spec lead consulted. They said I should log a ticket against the Servlet specification on this matter. That is something I think I shall do. I found some wording in the specification that should likely have more detail. Cheers, Paul On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:49

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22 March 2016 14:46:31 GMT+00:00, Christopher Schultz wrote: >Mark, > >On 3/17/16 1:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 17 March 2016 16:06:10 GMT+00:00, Paul Benedict > wrote: >>> This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it. >It's >>> really about the EE specification in regar

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 3/17/16 1:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 17 March 2016 16:06:10 GMT+00:00, Paul Benedict > wrote: >> This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it. It's >> really about the EE specification in regards to any servlet container. >> I'd >> like to get professional opinion

"Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-19 Thread Paul Benedict
This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it. It's really about the EE specification in regards to any servlet container. I'd like to get professional opinions on this part of the specification. I am quoting from EE 5.0 (see link below), section 8.3.1, paragraph 3c: The Deploye

Re: "Distinct and non-overlapping" context roots

2016-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 17 March 2016 16:06:10 GMT+00:00, Paul Benedict wrote: >This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it. It's >really about the EE specification in regards to any servlet container. >I'd >like to get professional opinions on this part of the specification. > >I am quoting from E