j2sdk1.4.2_12
our custom layer ontop of it has to stick to that
thank
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> tootbatoot,
>
> tootbatoot wrote:
> | Hi Thanks. the two applications run on their own and don't share jvm
- do you see any performance
gains if I switch to 5.5.17 from 5.0.28 . the only problem I have on my end
i that I have to use plugin for 5.5.17 for backward compatibility to
j2sdk1.4.2_12.
thanks
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
&
ize of
jvm.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: tootbatoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 memory usage - garbage collection
>>
>> jdk1.4.2_12
>
> I'd strongly recommend upgrading to a newer JVM. 1.6 especially is
> noticea
Thanks. Sorry for not including the environment info - here it is:
OS: Windows server 2003 SP1
jdk1.4.2_12
I am checking the numbers from task manager console and not sure whether
these are virtual or real ones? how to find this, thanks.
t
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: t
Hi Guys - Can you please help me understand behavior of 5.0.28 tomcat. When I
put load on it via my webapp - I can see the memory allocated to the process
going up (in task manager) but when I kill the session of the webapp (i.e.
remove the load) it does not come down.
Should not the tomcat proces
