I seem to have hit a snag with proxying to ajp under httpd 2.2.3 & Tomcat
5.5.20
My configuration include 5 virtual hosts on 2 domains. One directs
everything on to Tomcat. One directs a single application on to Tomcat,
while the other directs on to a Python server.
The odd thing is that the f
commons-logging resides in tomcat/bin and dynamicaly binds to log4j / sdk
logging.
this can cause some headaches, and apparently also some memory leaks, when
you set up logging in your own web-app and wan't the two to work together.
There is a nice wrapper called SLF4j which statically the comm
a way to improve your security for
> the future. Tomcat by default does not use it's credentials over the
> network. It just uses those credentials to run itself and access files on
> the local system.
>
> --David
>
> hv @ Fashion Content wrote:
>
>>I had an inciden
I had an incident on my server the other day where someone had succesfully
broken into the server to execute a port scanner.
The port scanner was running under the tomcat process so I assume the
breakin was done by getting through the Tomcat manager app.
At first I feared that I had made a blun
Ok, thanks.
Guess I will have to work until I upgrade the server to Fedora Core 4.
"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
errors,
so I suspect that it is more severe than a lack of logging statements.
I didn't get any logged exceptions under 5.5.9, but under 5.5.12 I did.
"hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have xerxesImpl and xml-apis i
It could be that I just need to fix my httpd.conf, but I am a bit stuck.
I basicly have a virtualhost like this:
DocumentRoot /var/www/site1
Allow from all
JkUriSet worker ajp13:localhost:8009
I want all requests to /ldapadmin.* to be served by apache+php and the rest
to be served by tomca
I have xerxesImpl and xml-apis in tomcat/common/endorsed
might that be causing some trouble?
Upgraded to 5.5.12 but the config failure persists
"hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The error information on context.xml par
:
"Rob Hills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On 4 Dec 2005 at 4:38, hv @ Fashion Content
ROTECTED]
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On 4 Dec 2005 at 3:33, hv @ Fashion Content wrote:
>
>> Sigh :(
>>
>> Gawd I hate changing Tomcat configurations, it always goes pearshaped.
>>
>> Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in the war
>> file when
You can have multiple definitions in server.xml
I am trying to get what you are looking for to work on my own setup atm.
In principle it is easy. But as always when configuration goes wrong with
Tomcat, you are in the dark.
"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL P
> Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in
> the war file when I unzip it???
>Is it inside WEB-INF (which must be in caps)?
It is generated by the Ant WAR task, so yes it is, and I verified it as
well. context.xml is in META-INF.
> And how come the default behaviour is to show
> Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in the war file
> when
> I unzip it???
> partial server.xml:
> deployOnStartup="true" autoDeploy="false" xmlValidation="true">
>Have you always had xmlValidation set to true or did you change that
>recently?
I have been banging my hea
tup cannot be achieved using form
authentication.
In my mind that makes form authentication completely useless.
Hopefully I got it all wrong, and there is a way to achieve my goal.
"Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hv @ Fashion Co
Sigh :(
Gawd I hate changing Tomcat configurations, it always goes pearshaped.
Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in the war file when
I unzip it???
And how come the default behaviour is to show the contents of the hosts app
base ???
Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC2
partial server.xm
meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hv @
> Fashion Content
> Subject: Re: NullPointer Exception in HostConfig
>
> P.S. the ROOT.xml does end with a
Which could well be part of the problem, since the tag is not
. Case matters. Also
P.S. the ROOT.xml does end with a
"hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The error information on context.xml parsing is very sparse to say the
> least...
>
> SEVERE: Error deploying confi
The error information on context.xml parsing is very sparse to say the
least...
SEVERE: Error deploying configuration descriptor ROOT.xml
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:574)
at
org.apache.catalina.startup
homas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hv @ Fashion Content wrote:
>> I get:
>>
>> HTTP Status 408 - The time allowed for the login process has been
>> exceeded. If you wish to continue you must either click back twice and
>>
ss load is high set this parameter lower
> #If your process load is low set this parameter higher
> KeepAliveTimeout 15
>
> Viel Gluck,
> Martin-
> - Original Message -
> From: "hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005
I get:
HTTP Status 408 - The time allowed for the login process has been exceeded.
If you wish to continue you must either click back twice and re-click the
link you requested or close and re-open your browser
Will it happen when a JSESSION cookie is on the client, but no longer on the
server?
I think its a port of mod_jk, which could need a bit of love :)
I am really hoping that mod_proxy_ajp grows solid, as I am sure it will be a
great improvement.
"Joseph Shraibman" skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Does anybody have any idea how to use mod_proxy_ajp? The documentat
to figure out why I get a session timeout upon success.
"hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have set up the standard form authentication which posts to the url
>'/j_security_check' with two forms
> Home
I expected to be able to do something after auth and before loading the page
based on this:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v5r1//index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.websphere.exp.doc/info/exp/ae/tsec_servlet.html
"hv @ Fashion Content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en
I am in the same situation.
What sort of proxying do you use?
"Brian Bonner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have a suggested solution to this problem? Thanks.
Brian
On 10/31/05, Brian Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I forgot to share that there
I have set up the standard form authentication which posts to the url
'/j_security_check' with two forms
Home.htm and AccessDenied.htm.
If I fail log in
1) The sitewide filter is not called upon receiving the j_security_check
POST
2) It does determine the failure and chains to Home.htm
3) It doe
How to you get getContextPath() to return blank for a webapp ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good point, but I am not trying to adhere strictly to the URI rfc, as it is
generated by the server to refer to the server.
"Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hv @ Fashio
I am trying to figure out a little headache I am having with the
servlet-mapping
portalapp
*.topic
Should catch all of the following if I am not mistaken, not just some of
them right?
http://www.domain.com/ZoA+xaeoHh6s,$EnterPromotionCode.$Form.topic
http://www.domain.com/ZoA+xaeoHh6s,$EnterPr
Is there a way have getContextPath return "" other than setting it up as
ROOT context
I seem to remember working, but it
doesn't seem to have any effect in 5.5.9
I have that old problem of rewriting URLs to get rid of the pesky context
path.
Cheers,
Henrik
-
30 matches
Mail list logo
