On 1/28/2013 7:11 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
bxqdev,
On 1/26/13 3:04 PM, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/26/2013 9:36 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of chris derham Subject: Re: Different
On 1/28/2013 7:13 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
bxqdev,
On 1/26/13 1:09 AM, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/26/2013 1:05 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Dude,
On 1/25/13 12:38 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i want to have one instance of webapp,
No problem
On 1/26/2013 9:36 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of chris derham
Subject: Re: Different webapp paths on different hosts
To my mind if you deploy the app as ROOT.war, as long as DNS is
configured correctly, that single context wi
On 1/26/2013 9:23 PM, chris derham wrote:
it's not. maybe it will make things clear if i change the names of the
paths, say:
* when user goes to http://app1.com/ -> {thesamewebapp}/app1 path is served
as root path of the domain app1.com
* when user goes to http://app2.com/ -> {thesamewebapp}/
On 1/26/2013 1:05 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dude,
On 1/25/13 12:38 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i want to have one instance of webapp,
No problem.
which has two paths,
Problem: one context = one path = one instance
If you want two separate
On 1/25/2013 12:29 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/1/25 bxqdev :
Anyway I would say a context.xml file in conf/catalina/path1 (the
hostname)/path1.xml (the context name) should do the trick?
Place the webapp outside the appbase of the hosts and then point the
docbase to the webapp (or
On 1/25/2013 12:11 PM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
See inline
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Casper W. Schmidt
Den 25-01-2013 06:38, bxqdev skrev:
On 1/24/2013 11:52 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
See inline
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Casper W. Schmidt
Den 24-01-2013 02:32
On 1/24/2013 11:52 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
See inline
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Casper W. Schmidt
Den 24-01-2013 02:32, Christopher Schultz skrev:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BBQ,
On 1/23/13 12:09 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i need to map a custom paths, like
On 1/24/2013 5:32 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BBQ,
On 1/23/13 12:09 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i need to map a custom paths, like "/path1" and "/path2", (not root
"/" path), of the same webapp to a custom domains.
samewebapp}/path1 is mapped to http://path1.com/path1
${samewebapp}/path2 is mapped to http://path2.com/path2
custom paths of the same webapp should map to different root paths on different
domains.
thanks!
On 1/23/2013 8:58 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: bxqdev [mailto:bxq...@them
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to look on the situation from
another point of view, the one which is not depressive.
i hope my question & answer summary upgraded your level of tomcat understanding.
and that's a good thing, because you wouldn
On 1/28/2012 6:14 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 28 Jan 2012, at 13:34, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
connector+servlet api
1. bio connector + async servlet
2. nio
59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:16, bxqdev wrote:
2. async servlet api is not much usefull for servers, with nio
connectors (tomcat-7). at least you can't image the case.
I don't say that. In fact, I said exactly the opposite.
well, then what's the case to use both of th
On 1/28/2012 12:09 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 27 Jan 2012, at 23:53, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote
On 1/28/2012 6:33 AM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
How much is a lot?
10'000/sec
How many Tomcats are you running?
1
How much RAM/CPU per server etc?
8GB/Xeon
How big is the average response?
300Kb
How many NICs do you have? Have fast are they?
one. as i said above, the actua
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello
On 1/28/2012 2:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:41, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchr
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both connector and servlet code are async.
is there a case when i would need s
On 1/28/2012 1:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:31, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you really mean?
i mean what are the reasons to
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such protocol as "apache.coyote.h
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
connectors?
2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with Http11NioProtocol connector or do i have to use Async Servlet Api to
get the advan
27 matches
Mail list logo
