Re: JK connector fails with long URLs

2009-01-19 Thread br1
br1 wrote: > > > Christopher Schultz-2 wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Br1, >> >> br1 wrote: >>> Do you think this limit will be increased in the next versions? >>> >>> In

Re: JK connector fails with long URLs

2009-01-16 Thread br1
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Br1, > > br1 wrote: >> Do you think this limit will be increased in the next versions? >> >> In theory, no limit is imposed by the protocol itself. I would tend to >

Re: JK connector fails with long URLs

2009-01-16 Thread br1
Hi, Thank you.. if this was this easy.. :-) Unfortunately, one of their requirements is to send the URLs by email. I already told them to use a different method, but I still hope to see an higher limit in the next JK version. Thanks again, Br1. awarnier wrote: > > br1 wrote: >>

Re: JK connector fails with long URLs

2009-01-15 Thread br1
at 2k are more than enough for any URL, but the only place I can impose this limit is at home. And maybe not for much longer. :-) Thank you, Br1. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JK-connector-fails-with-long-URLs-tp21443475p21489226.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing

Re: JK connector fails with long URLs

2009-01-15 Thread br1
bug? Note: on Windows, IE 6 and 7 do not seem to support URLs with more than 2048 characters. The problem shows on Firefox and Chrome only, where this limit is not present. For the records, Opera just does not open such a long address. Thank you, Br1. br1 wrote: > > Hi, > > I am ex

JK connector fails with long URLs

2009-01-13 Thread br1
appear when I remove the JK ISAPI filter. What should I do? Thank you in advance, Br1 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JK-connector-fails-with-long-URLs-tp21443475p21443475.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

RE: Convenient web application configuration.

2008-10-30 Thread br1
Hi, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: br1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Convenient web application configuration. >> >> The easiest way is to place Context and the different >> Resource elements into each Tomcat's server.xml file. > &g

Re: Convenient web application configuration.

2008-10-30 Thread br1
d deploying the WAR wouldn't blow away existing > configuration data. > > Jason, The easiest way is to place Context and the different Resource elements into each Tomcat's server.xml file. Someone will tell you that it's not recommended, but it will just work. Hope

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-10 Thread br1
Apologies, This one is much better, netstat shows 50 connections I don't know enough of Tomcat to understand if anything in this log could cause this issue.. Thanks! Br1 http://www.nabble.com/file/p19920236/tomcat%2Bthread%2Bdump%2B4%2B-%2Bfiltered.zip tomcat+thread+dump+4+-+filtere

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-09 Thread br1
vide additional information, configuration files, etc. Some of my colleagues use to tell me: "Someone, somewhere in the world, had some problem using something. Can you please solve this." Thanks for your help, Br1 http://www.nabble.com/file/p19907446/tomcat%2Bthread%2Bdump%2B3%2B-%2Bfilte

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-04 Thread br1
re the reason of my problem I would still suggest to lower this number. Though, so far it is not clear at all that this is the cause. :-) Thanks, br1 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JK-and-IIS---troubles--tp19750760p19818936.html Sent

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-04 Thread br1
ions to the Tomcat instance, is this right? So maybe I am just out of connections.. Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > Done. > Though it would fit better on "connections" page more than on a "timeouts" page. :-) Thanks for the help! br1 -- View this message in context: ht

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-02 Thread br1
what total should not be exceeded in this particular case, of if the good old document by Mladen Turk is still valid fixing this number to 2000 (http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html) Thanks a lot for your help, br1. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JK-an

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-02 Thread br1
em, even in serious production. Don't mix the notions of > thread dump and memory dump though. The latter takes quite long, but is > not what you need here. > Yes, but I am just afraid of my site hanging as I was explaining above. :-) Thank you, br1. -- View this message in context: http

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-01 Thread br1
ds fair some way.. and it's definitely what is needed to take a thread dump without killing everything.. Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > >> BTW, thanks for writing the timeouts page, it was really needed. :-) > > Yes it was, sorry that it took that long. > It's

Re: JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-10-01 Thread br1
cats and apps since years, and no problems like this. I myself thought this was just not possible, so it took long time to figure this out. BTW, thanks for writing the timeouts page, it was really needed. :-) Br1. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JK-and-IIS---troubl

JK and IIS - troubles?

2008-09-30 Thread br1
he JK connector should be fixed if it is causing this problem. Kindly let me know what should I provide in order to investigate about this. Thank you in advance, Br1 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JK-and-IIS---troubles--tp19750760p19750760.html Sent from the Tomcat -

Re: How to specify windows user in runtime in tomcat?

2007-12-14 Thread br1
You can try with jcifs (http://jcifs.samba.org/). It should allow you to access a remote share using a different user context, though I'd reccommend using a dedicated account for this kind of job. Hope it helps, b. nitin403 wrote: > > > > Juha Laiho wrote: >> >> nitin403 wrote: >>> I have

Re: compiling APR/tcnative on Win32

2007-12-01 Thread br1
acquire the source for Rpcrt4 > 2)coax Rpcrt4.dll to library format Rpc4t.lib and link it in > i think there is a DLL2Lib hanging around somewhere? > ask the folks on tomcat-dev if they have a DLL2Lib utility > > GL! > M-- > ----- Original Message - > From: "b

Re: compiling APR/tcnative on Win32

2007-11-29 Thread br1
Hi, Thank you for your reply. Though the actual question is: what should I change in the Visual C++ project in order to get it compiled correctly? It is a non VC++ programmer question, you know :-) Thanks again, b. mgainty wrote: > > Hi Bruno > its supposed to be located in %SystemRoot%\syst

Re: Tomcat Security/Service question..

2007-11-29 Thread br1
Joe, I would try running the service under your credentials. If it works, it's not a Tomcat problem. In general, the user has to be recognized both by the local machine and by the remote machines that you are trying to query. The "service user" you are using might not have the necessary rights o

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread br1
re > then enough for a single box and an average application. > See: > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html Thanks a lot, br1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread br1
So one shouldn't be able to put more then 1 worker because on WinXP it is not supported..? :-) I was talking about a server version infact.. more than 20 connections, etc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

RE: Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-13 Thread br1
Also, a little comment: it would be useful to have a default higher than 10 for cachesize, or maybe a global setting in the isapi_redirect.properties file. Thanks again, br1. - Original Message - From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Se

Small connection problems with JK 1.2.15 and IIS 5

2006-01-11 Thread br1
t would be the maximum number for each WORKER.cachesize? 25? 200? 6- Too many questions? :-) Thanks a lot for your attention, br1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]