br1 wrote:
>
>
> Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Br1,
>>
>> br1 wrote:
>>> Do you think this limit will be increased in the next versions?
>>>
>>> In
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Br1,
>
> br1 wrote:
>> Do you think this limit will be increased in the next versions?
>>
>> In theory, no limit is imposed by the protocol itself. I would tend to
>
Hi,
Thank you.. if this was this easy.. :-)
Unfortunately, one of their requirements is to send the URLs by email.
I already told them to use a different method, but I still hope to see an
higher limit in the next JK version.
Thanks again,
Br1.
awarnier wrote:
>
> br1 wrote:
>>
at 2k are more than enough for
any URL, but the only place I can impose this limit is at home. And maybe
not for much longer. :-)
Thank you,
Br1.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-connector-fails-with-long-URLs-tp21443475p21489226.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing
bug?
Note: on Windows, IE 6 and 7 do not seem to support URLs with more than 2048
characters. The problem shows on Firefox and Chrome only, where this limit
is not present. For the records, Opera just does not open such a long
address.
Thank you,
Br1.
br1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am ex
appear when I remove the JK ISAPI filter.
What should I do?
Thank you in advance,
Br1
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-connector-fails-with-long-URLs-tp21443475p21443475.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: br1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Convenient web application configuration.
>>
>> The easiest way is to place Context and the different
>> Resource elements into each Tomcat's server.xml file.
>
&g
d deploying the WAR wouldn't blow away existing
> configuration data.
>
>
Jason,
The easiest way is to place Context and the different Resource elements into
each Tomcat's server.xml file.
Someone will tell you that it's not recommended, but it will just work.
Hope
Apologies,
This one is much better, netstat shows 50 connections
I don't know enough of Tomcat to understand if anything in this log could
cause this issue..
Thanks!
Br1
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19920236/tomcat%2Bthread%2Bdump%2B4%2B-%2Bfiltered.zip
tomcat+thread+dump+4+-+filtere
vide additional
information, configuration files, etc.
Some of my colleagues use to tell me: "Someone, somewhere in the world, had
some problem using something. Can you please solve this."
Thanks for your help,
Br1
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19907446/tomcat%2Bthread%2Bdump%2B3%2B-%2Bfilte
re the reason of
my problem I would still suggest to lower this number.
Though, so far it is not clear at all that this is the cause. :-)
Thanks,
br1
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-and-IIS---troubles--tp19750760p19818936.html
Sent
ions to the Tomcat
instance, is this right? So maybe I am just out of connections..
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
> Done.
>
Though it would fit better on "connections" page more than on a "timeouts"
page. :-)
Thanks for the help!
br1
--
View this message in context:
ht
what total should not be exceeded
in this particular case, of if the good old document by Mladen Turk is still
valid fixing this number to 2000
(http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html)
Thanks a lot for your help,
br1.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-an
em, even in serious production. Don't mix the notions of
> thread dump and memory dump though. The latter takes quite long, but is
> not what you need here.
>
Yes, but I am just afraid of my site hanging as I was explaining above. :-)
Thank you,
br1.
--
View this message in context:
http
ds fair some way.. and it's definitely
what is needed to take a thread dump without killing everything..
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
>> BTW, thanks for writing the timeouts page, it was really needed. :-)
>
> Yes it was, sorry that it took that long.
>
It's
cats and apps since years,
and no problems like this.
I myself thought this was just not possible, so it took long time to figure
this out.
BTW, thanks for writing the timeouts page, it was really needed. :-)
Br1.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-and-IIS---troubl
he JK connector should be fixed if it is
causing this problem.
Kindly let me know what should I provide in order to investigate about
this.
Thank you in advance,
Br1
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-and-IIS---troubles--tp19750760p19750760.html
Sent from the Tomcat -
You can try with jcifs (http://jcifs.samba.org/).
It should allow you to access a remote share using a different user context,
though I'd reccommend using a dedicated account for this kind of job.
Hope it helps,
b.
nitin403 wrote:
>
>
>
> Juha Laiho wrote:
>>
>> nitin403 wrote:
>>> I have
acquire the source for Rpcrt4
> 2)coax Rpcrt4.dll to library format Rpc4t.lib and link it in
> i think there is a DLL2Lib hanging around somewhere?
> ask the folks on tomcat-dev if they have a DLL2Lib utility
>
> GL!
> M--
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "b
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
Though the actual question is: what should I change in the Visual C++
project in order to get it compiled correctly?
It is a non VC++ programmer question, you know :-)
Thanks again,
b.
mgainty wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno
> its supposed to be located in %SystemRoot%\syst
Joe,
I would try running the service under your credentials. If it works, it's
not a Tomcat problem.
In general, the user has to be recognized both by the local machine and by
the remote machines that you are trying to query. The "service user" you are
using might not have the necessary rights o
re
> then enough for a single box and an average application.
> See:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html
Thanks a lot,
br1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So one shouldn't be able to put more then 1 worker because on WinXP it is not
supported..? :-)
I was talking about a server version infact.. more than 20 connections, etc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Also, a little comment: it would be useful to have a default higher than 10 for
cachesize, or maybe a global setting in the isapi_redirect.properties file.
Thanks again,
br1.
- Original Message -
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Se
t would be the maximum
number for each WORKER.cachesize? 25? 200?
6- Too many questions? :-)
Thanks a lot for your attention,
br1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25 matches
Mail list logo