On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 15:15 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> This might help:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
>
That does make sense as I'm pretty sure alot of the pages are close to
the limit already. When I get time to dig, if it looks like something
way off-base I'll post
I recently pushed an update to Tomcat 8.5.5 on our systems and are now
getting reports of jsp compilation errors and we're seeing numerous new
cases of:
The code of method _jspService(HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse)
is exceeding the 65535 bytes limit
I know we have alot of not-recommended
On Sat, 2016-07-30 at 02:07 +, Wang, Andy wrote:
> I did a quick read of the spec just now, and I can't find a good
> explanation of which is correct. Would this be considered a
> regression in 8.5.x?
Another quick re-read:
9.4.2 Forwarded Request Parameters
states this:
Th
I have a really simply example (courtesy of the developer that discovered this
issue) at:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24563006/TestApp.war
It contains a test.jsp that does:
<%
String href= "/WEB-INF/jsp/test/test1.jsp";
RequestDispatcher rd = request.getRequestDispatcher(href);
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 17:16 +, Wang, Andy wrote:
> We're seeing some really poor performance with isapi_redirect.dll and
> uploading files with IIS.
>
> In a particular example, using a 200MB file, the file upload (POST)
> takes ~50 seconds on localhost.
>
> The sa
We're seeing some really poor performance with isapi_redirect.dll and
uploading files with IIS.
In a particular example, using a 200MB file, the file upload (POST)
takes ~50 seconds on localhost.
The same upload using Apache and mod_jk takes about ~6 seconds.
The interesting thing is, on a remo
Sorry, correction:
default keepalivetimeout = connectionTimeout = 2 (20s)
Andy
From: Andy Wang [aw...@ptc.com]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 11:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: TCP connections reuse
Could this be as simple as the default keepali
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 16:05 -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >
> > If only one address per Connector can be specified, can you not
> > just use 2 s, one for each ? They should not conflict.
>
> That should definitely work (address="127.0.0.1" and address="::") but
> one connector might be nic
0000, Wang, Andy wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:51 +0000, Wang, Andy wrote:
> We have a customer that's seeing a very slow memory leak under certain
> circumstances that we haven't yet been able to pinpoint. I can
> reproduce it, but it requires a very particular method of dow
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:51 +, Wang, Andy wrote:
> We have a customer that's seeing a very slow memory leak under certain
> circumstances that we haven't yet been able to pinpoint. I can
> reproduce it, but it requires a very particular method of downloading
> fi
We have a customer that's seeing a very slow memory leak under certain
circumstances that we haven't yet been able to pinpoint. I can
reproduce it, but it requires a very particular method of downloading
files that I don't quite understand yet. (not entirely sure how this
would impact mod_jk eithe
11 matches
Mail list logo
