Re: mod_jk reply_timeout and error state

2010-04-21 Thread Sean GAO
ng it. Which is lame, I know. Anyway, thank you again for the help and insight. Regards, Sean On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On 20.04.2010 08:04, Sean GAO wrote: >> >> According to online documentation >> (http://tomcat.apache.

Re: mod_jk reply_timeout and error state

2010-04-19 Thread Sean GAO
else could I do? Balancer worker's method=Busyness setting may have some effect, but still this is different. What do you think? Thanks, Sean On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Sean GAO wrote: > Hi, > > We are running apache 2.2.4 and tomcat 5.5.28 with mod_jk 1.2.28. 3 > tomcat in

mod_jk reply_timeout and error state

2010-04-19 Thread Sean GAO
Hi, We are running apache 2.2.4 and tomcat 5.5.28 with mod_jk 1.2.28. 3 tomcat instances. Referring to http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html , we came up with a workers.properties file like this: worker.list=balancer worker.maintain=30 #tomcat01 worker.tomcat01.port=1800