On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>
> the fellow who wrote it was writing code for at least 2 other projects
> it may have been a case of where he accomplished 75% of what was needed then
> some other task got moved to his front burner
I hear you, we've all been there a couple o
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> both the entries and web.xml reference
> ContextResource
>
> //WebAnnotationSet.java
> protected static void addResource(Context context, Resource annotation)
> {
>
> //if the annotation is
> DataSource,ConnectionFactory,QueueConnectionFa
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Christopher
Schultz wrote:
>On 8/31/2009 6:19 PM, Robert Whane wrote:
>> Okay, it's optional, so I don't HAVE to use, but if I DO use it, what
>> possible advantage does it have?
>
> Adherence to the Servlet Specification?
Which
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
That's a very good start. Thanks!
There is however still one vital piece of information missing in the
proposed documentation update. It now clearly states that resource-ref
in the w
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> you can enter a documentation change to correct either
> 1)duplicate behaviour of ApplicationContext.xml by web.xml
>
> 2)or make the documentation a bit clearer on what is required and what is
> optional
That's not a bad idea really, but
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>
> mandatory: define the attributes in in
> applicationContext.xml
> OR
> optionally define the resource attributes or
> in web.xml
>
> http://proteinbank.vbi.vt.edu/tomcat-docs/config/context.html#Resource%20Definitions
Thanks for t
Hi,
I'm using Tomcat 6.20 and have configured a datasource in
META-INF/context.xml, which looks basically like this:
For brevity I have removed some attributes, but this is basically my
definition.
I can now just directly look up this DataSource using JDNI under the
java:comp/env/jdbc/myd
