Re: Mapping JSP's to outside of the war or expanded folder

2008-02-21 Thread Ralph Goers
We put a proxy in front of Tomcat. It serves all the static content. emerson cargnin wrote: Well, I said at the beginning that I'm not a big fan of this approach, but I understand the reasons behind it and the difficulties it would have to change it. Other reason for using this approach is when

Re: Mapping JSP's to outside of the war or expanded folder

2008-02-19 Thread Ralph Goers
Right. The only way access to your servers is "totally strict" is if they have no network connection and no human input devices connected. However, in the "spirit" in which you probably meant this, I will have to point out that if your web apps are running on the internet then what you are re

Re: Mapping JSP's to outside of the war or expanded folder

2008-02-19 Thread Ralph Goers
emerson cargnin wrote: We use windows on the dev workstatios and unix (SunOS 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200) on dev/qa/production servers. We use Java 5 and we are migrating to tomcat 5.5 or 6. Ralph, why do you say it's dangerous? Even if it doesn't have java code, it wou

Re: Mapping JSP's to outside of the war or expanded folder

2008-02-18 Thread Ralph Goers
We have a similar need. But doing this with JSPs is very dangerous since they can have java code within them. Instead, using a templating language like Velocity would seem to be a mucn better approach. emerson cargnin wrote: The policy of our company is to deploy the jsp's separated from the

Re: Tomcat connections not closing.

2007-10-27 Thread Ralph Goers
Mike, Have you been able to make any progress with this? I'm very interested in the outcome as we experience the same problem. Ralph Roark, Mike wrote: Filip, Thanks for the help. You were right about the default for disableUploadTimeout. I must have been looking at 5.0 docs before, it loo