On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On 1/6/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Sorry, for the potentially redundant question, but to clarify, is the
APR version of Tomcat officially released? The last
eters in order to determine how big they should be made,
but that will be left for another test.
Michael Czeiszperger
http://webperformance.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On 1/5/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Also a Tomcat 5.5.12 (or better 5.5.15) with and without APR test
against recent IBM, Sun, and BEA offerings would be reall
ness model for the likes of IBM.
(Note that our own products are not open source. They would be open
source if we could find a way to make a living that way.)
Michael Czeiszperger
http://webperformance.com
-
To unsubscri
Yes, we would like to bring APR into the mix, but its not officially
shipping on both platforms, or at least it wasn't when we started the
testing.
Michael Czeiszperger
http://webperformance.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
run the actual application. Of course to scale an
installation must figure out how to distribute an application among
multiple servers, but that's all part of capacity planning.
Michael Czeiszperger
http://webperformance.com
On Jan 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to
see antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you
read that correctly) I'd be curious to see how much or a
performance decrease there is when one is turned on.
load, and shows there is a significant different in performance.
Under the restricted conditions of the test Linux was able to handle
32% more load than Windows with identical versions of Tomcat on
identical hardware.
Michael Czeiszperger
