liability or responsibility for the posting.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 1:31 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Possible Spam] Re: HTTP/2 Memory Leak
On 09/07/2021 18:23, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thank you so much! This is good to k
: Mark Thomas
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 12:59 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Possible Spam] Re: HTTP/2 Memory Leak
Importance: Low
On 09/07/2021 16:21, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thanks. I have done more heap analysis and think I have it tracked closer to
> the source.
>
warranty for and
assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the posting.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Sargent
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 6:50 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Possible Spam] Re: HTTP/2 Memory Leak
Importance: Low
On 7/8/21 3:17 PM, Mark A. Claasse
monitor script in place that does a GC and then prints a
class_histogram every half hour to help us pinpoint what is happening.)
Thanks,
Mark
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 5:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [Possible Spam] Re: HTTP/2 Memory Leak
Importance: Low
Thanks
ld be eligible for GC.
There isn't much in the way of HTTP/2 specific leaks that have been fixed.
For HTTP/2, I'd expect you to see much more impact from the changes around
9.0.37 / 9.0.39 that reduced the footprint of closed HTTP/2 streams.
Mark
On 08/07/2021 19:32, Mark A.
Sorry, realized I had a mistyped subject.
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Http/s Memory Leak
Importance: Low
We are using 9.0.12 on a server and noticed a pretty big memory leak. The
change log mentions a
We are using 9.0.12 on a server and noticed a pretty big memory leak. The
change log mentions a some fixed leaks in the releases since 9.0.12.
I was wondering if this leak was fixed already.
The leak is that there are over 80,000 instances of
org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes. Below is
My guess would be that whatever JRE webstart is using to launch does not
support TLS 1.3. We used webstart for a long time, and this type of error
looks pretty familiar. As I am sure you have experienced, just because the
browser can connect (with its certifications, proxies, protocols, ...) d
I am not sure how it is not working for you, so this may not be relevant.
However, this caused me a lot of confusion.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57601284/java-11-and-12-ssl-sockets-fail-on-a-handshake-failure-error-with-tlsv1-3-enable
I had to disable TLS 1.3 to get my Java client to c
While on the subject of CATALINA_OPTS. In 9.0.46, the catalina.sh script
displays these when it runs. I have several options in the CATALINA_OPTS,
which makes this pretty long.
I don't remember it being this way in the past. I would imagine that if this
was changed to be like this, there was
: Friday, June 11, 2021 5:00 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange connection error
On 11/06/2021 21:01, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> RESOLVED. (Sort of, I have questions) I had to add a -TLSv1.3
> protocols="all -SSLv3 -TLSv1 -TLSv1.3"
>
> https://stackoverflow.
iance upon the information contained in the communication
or any attachments.
-Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 3:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Strange connection error
I have tried so many things, I am getting a bit confused. :)
The exc
, copy, disclose the contents or
take any action in reliance upon the information contained in the communication
or any attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Strange connection error
I turned all
, 2021, 15:11 Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Anyway, I will do some research on the debugging technique mentioned
> earlier.
>
https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K50557518
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: us
o not deliver, distribute, copy, disclose the contents or
take any action in reliance upon the information contained in the communication
or any attachments.
-Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 4:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Strange connectio
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and
its attachments. Do not deliver, distribute, copy, disclose the contents or
take any action in reliance upon the information contained in the communication
or any attachments.
-Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent
sponsibility for the posting.
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Claassen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 2:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Strange connection error
Thanks for the tip. To be honest, I am not exactly sure how to set that up,
but since it involves the rebuilding of the
error
Importance: Low
On 10/06/2021 18:11, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Is doesn't seem like OpenSSL is rejecting the connection. I would have
> thought that if OpenSSL would have rejected the connection, it would not hit
> even hit the access log. M
copy, disclose, or take any action based on this
message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.
Thank you for your cooperation.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark A. Claas
I just upgraded from 9.0.12 to 9.0.46. Everything seemed to go pretty
smoothly, but I am getting a strange connection error from certain connections
We have several different things that connect to the webserver. Browsers
connect fine. We have a monitoring script in Perl that works fine. How
<-- 89
}
-Original Message-
From: calder
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 12:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: NullPointerException in CoyoteOutputStream
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 10:36 Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> We were doing some load testing and we started getting a
> NullP
We were doing some load testing and we started getting a NullPointerException
at the stack trace below. We don't get the NPE all the time, so I am guessing
some of these objects got corrupted somehow.
One place the clear() method is called from is the recycle() method in the
Response object fro
, 2019 12:43 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which native package should I use
On 25/06/2019 16:11, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> I recently noticed that my tomcat-native library was in the wrong location
> and not accessible to Tomcat. However, I was very surprised that this seems
&
I recently noticed that my tomcat-native library was in the wrong location and
not accessible to Tomcat. However, I was very surprised that this seems to be
not matter. Then I noticed that the tomcat-jni.jar looks like the same thing.
Do I need to use the tomcat-native JAR file (tomcat-native-
onday, November 26, 2018 12:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Overriding MultiPartConfig
On 26/11/2018 17:11, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> I am having trouble finding a way to override my MultiPart config. I have a
> servlet with a configuration in
I am having trouble finding a way to override my MultiPart config. I have a
servlet with a configuration in the web.xml.
...
...
However,
PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Debugging tomcat native connector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 11/1/18 11:51, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I am using
> "org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol" in Tomcat 9.
>
> The
o, nio2 or apr?
I ask because we have problems with nio2-openssl when ssl session is reused
e.g. when a request is proxied with nginx.
kind regards,
Roger
Mark A. Claassen schrieb am Mi. 31. Okt. 2018 um 15:32:
> Is there a way to debug the native connectors? Specifically, we are
> havi
Is there a way to debug the native connectors? Specifically, we are having
some problems getting the native openssl connector working on Ubuntu.
Doing an strace on the process shows a lot of FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, but we don't
know why. We were hoping that there was some way to get more informatio
I recently discovered some request attributes that I was curious about. Are
these accurate across all connectors? Or are these the defaults for using
something like the NIO connector?
Specifically in my case, I am using the APR connector and openSSL.
Example:
Attribute 'org
ed back to java
8_161.
But that's been my brief experiences with TCAT 9 and Java 9
===
Thank You;
Chris Cheltenham
Technology Services
The School District of Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Claassen
Has anyone tried running Tomcat 9 using OpenJDK 9 or 10? I know the OpenJDK
releases don't have all the modules (like JavaFX) that the Oracle JDK does and
I was wondering if the libraries that Tomcat needs are part of the standard
OpenJDK distribution?
Thanks,
Mark Claassen
Senior Software E
: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 11:54 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Security of AJP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark(s) and Terence,
On 3/1/18 11:20 AM, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thanks everyone for y
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I am the one who unknowingly opened this
can of worms. :)
It seems like there is a bit of momentum for altering the documentation, so I
thought I would offer something that incorporated some of these suggestions. I
left out the part about "why" one would use
>From what I have read, it seems that the AJP connector is not secure, and is
>meant to be used in a protective environment. There are lots of things that
>imply this, like no SSL settings and such, but I cannot find it directly
>stated anywhere. I am pretty confident in my read of this, but i
t: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Possible incompatibility from Tomcat 8 to Tomcat 9 on HTTP 302
On 26/02/18 20:19, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thanks! That was the configuration setting I needed, but didn't know to look
> for. Adding that attribute and
on the information contained in the communication
or any attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 2:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Possible incompatibility from Tomcat 8 to Tomcat 9 on HTTP 302
On 26/02/18
Hi. I am working on migrating from Tomcat 8 (not 8.5) to Tomcat 9. Everything
worked great, except that when we run Tomcat 9 behind a reverse proxy, our
redirects don't work anymore. I am able to run the same webapp under both and
am doing so. The one running under Tomcat 8 works, the one ru
38 matches
Mail list logo
