Hi all,
I see discussions about migration to Tomcat 7. Do you think it is the right
moment to count your production apps on it? My thought is "no way Jose" but
maybe I'm missing something...
Thank you,
JC
-
To unsubs
> From: Markus Schönhaber
>
> Yes, it is an error. But in this case, I, too, consider the error erroneous.
> A status code of 400 basically means that the request was syntactically
> b0rked. But, as I understand it, that's not the problem here: the
> request is syntactically fine - it fails be
> From: Pid
>
> On 12/2/10 10:24 PM, Justin Case wrote:
> > Yeah I probably will do that - but I will still regard it as a dirty
hack...
>
> A ROOT app should be mandatory.
It's not - yet :) so I'm all legal without. But what do you think about the 400
err
> From: Pid
>
> On 12/2/10 12:34 PM, Justin Case wrote:
> > Error is fine, as long it's a 404 (and not this enigmatic 400)...
>
> 400 isn't enigmatic and /is/ an error. ;)
It IS an error indeed, but we're not talking about throwing just ANY random
erro
> From: "Caldarale, Charles R"
>
> When you say "standalone context.xml", are you referring to a
>element located in the webapp's META-INF/context.xml directory?
Yes, that one.
> Make sure you don't have a conf/Catalina/[host]/[appName].xml file, since
> that
>
>will override anything i
> From: Gregor Schneider
>
> I feel that ppl have a problem if they mistrust their developers in so
> far that they have to lock their box even to their own developers
> maintaing the apps. And I'm not talking about full access but I'm
> talking about browsing the logs.
>
> Besides, when havi
> From: Pid
> If the request isn't being routed to your application, then without a
> ROOT application the host hasn't got a mechanism to serve any response
> other than an error.
Error is fine, as long it's a 404 (and not this enigmatic 400)...
Thank you,
JC
---
> From: Pid
> This is either because your application is not deployed, or because the
> request path you're using does not match the actual request path deployed.
>
> When you start Tomcat, is there a message in the logs saying:
>
> 02-Dec-2010 10:44:17 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig
> From: Konstantin Kolinko
>
> Just curious: why wtpwebapps? Eclipse IDE uses that name.
Precisely :) Only because Eclipse publishes it there, so the name was kept. No
other reason.
> Try with recent 6.0.x (build it yourself), or 6.0.30 (when it comes
> out), or 7.0.5 -- they will log such
> From: "Caldarale, Charles R"
> JSPs are only compiled upon first reference, not before. That results in a
>slight (usually very slight) pause for the first guy in,
>
> so if you want to pre-compile them, there is a script available to do so:
>http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/jasper
First of all, thanks for your long answer.
> Please read (carefully), the following documentation:
Exactly from there I got the approach of "Copy unpacked directory hierarchy...".
> Your docBase would only work if you have a directory
> $CATALINA_BASE/com.mycompany.myapp.
It works actually,
Hello all,
I'm on Tomcat 6.0.29 in Windows (XP or server 2003, same) and I'm trying to get
an application to deploy automatically without putting it in server.xml - as
the
documentation strongly recommends.
Just to note, if I put the context setting in server.xml like this all works
fine.
12 matches
Mail list logo
