RE: mod_jk.dll Support

2007-01-02 Thread JiaDong Huang
.so, not in .dll. Regards, Rainer Jung JiaDong Huang wrote: > Hi, > > > > This is a re-post as a new email thread. Thanks Mark pointing it out - I did > not realize using reply would cause confusion to the mailing list. > > > > I can not find the mod_jk.dll

RE: mod_jk.dll Support

2007-01-01 Thread JiaDong Huang
nt. I can not find mod_jk.dll, but find the mod_jk-apache-2.2.3.so instead, with some confusing documentation. http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk-1.2 .20/ Dong -Original Message- From: JiaDong Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 2 January 20

mod_jk.dll Support

2007-01-01 Thread JiaDong Huang
Hi, This is a re-post as a new email thread. Thanks Mark pointing it out - I did not realize using reply would cause confusion to the mailing list. I can not find the mod_jk.dll from jk-1.2.20 build. Does it mean that is not supported any more? Or I should use the mod_jk-apache-2.2.3.so ins

mod_jk.dll Support

2007-01-01 Thread JiaDong Huang
Hi, I can not find the mod_jk.dll from jk-1.2.20 build. Does it mean that is not supported any more? Or I should use the mod_jk-apache-2.2.3.so instead? Thanks! Dong - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To u

RE: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread JiaDong Huang
Maybe certain verification tool can be considered to develop for JSP/Servlet developer. Sun has the verifier.bat tool verifying the integrity of the .WAR file and environment. Since the Request Object usage has already been stated in the spec. Maybe Tomcat can have certain JSP verification tool. I

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-13 Thread JiaDong Huang
arles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2006 3:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Multi processor issue > From: JiaDong Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Multi processor issue > > What I have been saying is that we should reconsider very >

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-12 Thread JiaDong Huang
issue > From: JiaDong Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Multi processor issue > > Not sure if the app really cares which thread should do the > parameterMap initialization. You're missing the entire point of this exercise: no Request object should EVER be processed by

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-12 Thread JiaDong Huang
Great to see the bottom of the MT issue has been revealed/understood. I believe Gael may be able to fix his app now. Hope it can be an easy fix... Not sure if the app really cares which thread should do the parameterMap initialization. If it does not, then it would be a good idea for Tomcat to ref

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-12 Thread JiaDong Huang
-Original Message- From: Marziou, Gael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 9:21 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Multi processor issue > Do you mean I should add a delay before the while loop to increase the > length of the critical section? Yes. Before and may

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-12 Thread JiaDong Huang
Gael, If you can build the Tomcat code/component, put in time delay code and also yield the CPU, within the ParameterMap initialization procedure. Dong -Original Message- From: Marziou, Gael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 12:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject

RE: [OT] Multi processor issue

2006-12-12 Thread JiaDong Huang
It would be pretty significant if it can get into the thread level clustering, especially for those database update threads group. What the real world is using for database connection clustering? Something like C-JDBC technology? Dong -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-11 Thread JiaDong Huang
single CPU environment, the issue should have been revealed too. Dong -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 3:30 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Multi processor issue > From: JiaDong Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Multi processor issue

2006-12-08 Thread JiaDong Huang
>From the description of the symptom - months' testing experience, we could pretty much confirm that it is a MP issue, not a MT issue. Chasing the stack dump of Java may not get to any significant point. If you try to fix the MP specific issue like this at the high level like Tomcat/JAVA app code,

RE: Is jsp designed for use by large websites

2006-12-07 Thread JiaDong Huang
ontextName() ); log.info("server info : " + context.getServerInfo()); log.info("servlet api " + context.getMajorVersion() + '.' + context.getMinorVersion()); On 12/7/06, JiaDong Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I know, JBoss/SunOne ar

RE: Is jsp designed for use by large websites

2006-12-06 Thread JiaDong Huang
As far as I know, JBoss/SunOne are all bundling Tomcat inside. Not sure where the feeling of "the number of Tomcat users to attenuate over time" comes from. Dong -Original Message- From: epyonne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2006 3:07 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subj

RE: Minimum requirement to run/test the Tomcat Cluster

2006-12-06 Thread JiaDong Huang
I have set up my own DNS server to have a play. My Tomcat cluster works well, including my Database Web App. Dong -Original Message- From: JiaDong Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2006 1:09 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Minimum requirement to run

Minimum requirement to run/test the Tomcat Cluster

2006-12-05 Thread JiaDong Huang
Hi, I would like to have a run/test with the Tomcat Cluster. Is that possible to setup the Tomcat Cluster without changing the DNS server, for the DNS Round Robin feature? I am wondering the functionality like load balancing and URL redirect within Tomcat itself might be able to support/configur