RE: GZIP Comrpession Problem

2009-05-04 Thread Glen Goodwin
assan Schroeder wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Glen Goodwin wrote: >> So this implies that 5.5.27 has this fixed and 6.0.18 does not. I'll make a >> note of that. > > ripple:/tmp$ curl -s -o nul: -H "Pragma: no-cache" -H "Cache-Control: > no-cac

RE: GZIP Comrpession Problem

2009-05-01 Thread Glen Goodwin
ested this on 5.5.27 using the HTTP 1.1 connector and a 77K javascript file and I got 77K uncompressed, and 26K compressed. Glen Goodwin wrote: > I have determined that any file larger than 48k is not getting compressed > regardless of mime type. I will be submitting this as a bug. >

RE: GZIP Comrpession Problem

2009-05-01 Thread Glen Goodwin
I have determined that any file larger than 48k is not getting compressed regardless of mime type. I will be submitting this as a bug. BUG TITLE Tomcat Compression limited to 48K CONFIGURATION Windows XP (SP3) Apache Tomcat 6.0.18 Java 1.6.0_13-b03 SPECIAL TOMCAT SETTINGS Set on the Connecto

RE: GZIP Comrpession Problem

2009-05-01 Thread Glen Goodwin
Anyone else have any useful thoughts on this before I start putting together a bug report? Glen -Original Message- Subject: GZIP Comrpession Problem Using Tomcat 6.0.18 I have configured GZIP compression by adding the following lines to my connector. compression="force" compressab

RE: GZIP Comrpession Problem

2009-04-29 Thread Glen Goodwin
Minfy does not seem to impact the success of compression one way or another. And I do not want to do just minify alone, but rather want compression and minify together, as the compression saving are more significant than the minify savings. Glen -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:p...@p