Re: FW: question regarding 'mod_jk: error flushing'

2006-11-02 Thread Durk Strooisma
ion is gone in mod_jk since more than a year. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > Durk Strooisma wrote: >> Alright, thanks for your explanation! >> >> Are the "mod_jk: error flushing" messages more or less harmless? If >> so, I prefer sticking to 1.2.6 for

Re: FW: question regarding 'mod_jk: error flushing'

2006-11-02 Thread Durk Strooisma
requirements. Per > default the switch is off. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > Durk Strooisma schrieb: >>> Hi Durk, >>> >>> are you really talking about mod_jk? >> >> Yep, the package "apache2-jakarta-tomcat-connectors" contains (fr

Re: FW: question regarding 'mod_jk: error flushing'

2006-11-01 Thread Durk Strooisma
the system. But then again, IF a new version of mod_jk would eliminate the error messages, we still don't know why or what it actually was. Durk > > Regards, > > Rainer > > Durk Strooisma wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I'm wondering the same. >> >>

Re: FW: question regarding 'mod_jk: error flushing'

2006-10-31 Thread Durk Strooisma
Hi all! I'm wondering the same. I've got four servers (two production machines and their testing counter parts) running SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 with Apache 2, Tomcat 5, and ModJK. Below the relevant packages are shown: apache2 2.0.49-27.59 apache2-prefork