-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bruce,
On 3/27/13 10:16 AM, Bruce Pease wrote:
> I am using Wicket 1.4.22 with Tomcat 7.0.37 and JDK 1.6.0_33. The
> recent upgrade to Tomcat created an issue where the cannot
>
> be undeployed unless the app is shut down due t
I am using Wicket 1.4.22 with Tomcat 7.0.37 and JDK 1.6.0_33. The recent
upgrade to Tomcat created an issue where the cannot
be undeployed unless the app is shut down due to the Wicket dependency
velocity logging in use (1.4).
We are running a web application under tomcat using the wicket
I am using a windows 2003 server 32 bit standard edition SP2 with IIS 6. I
have an isapi_redirect.dll v.1.2.31 communicating to tomcat via ajp1.3. JDK
version was 7.03, and tomcat version is 7.0.26. Tomcat is installed as a
service using the service.bat, and I am running two containers in the
cl
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 Cluster Issue
On 09/03/2012 18:33, Bruce Pease wrote:
> I can try the rollback the jdk, and try that. However, the issue
> doesn't appear to be jdk related.
Plenty of changes to NIO in Java 7 AFAIK.
Let us know if Java 6 + Tomcat 7 presen
g all applications with jdk 1.7 and
tomcat 7 dependencies, and redeploying the applications.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 1:02 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 Cluster Issue
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 08:38 -0800,
Good Morning:
I recently upgraded my tomcat containers from tomcat 6 to tomcat 7.0.26, and
the jdk from 1.6 to 1.7. I am now seeing a clustering issue when I start a
second instance on the same server. I have tried a few variations of the
config (address="auto", address="the ip", no address e
I have an issue with log4j 1.2.16 where the max file size on the rolling file
appender is not working (also not on 1.2.15) However, when I go back to my
previous log4j version (1.2.9), the file backups do work. Was there a config
change, or is this a known issue? My config is below:
log4j.ro
I'm just curious if anyone is using a 64 bit version of Linux, and has seen
performance degradation. We are looking to move off the Windows platform
eventually anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 4:34 PM
To: Tomcat User
From: Bruce Pease
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:46:35 AM
Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Perhaps my point is being missed here. The issue is moving from 32 bit is
slower in 64 bit (4-500% if you need a number). Components are the same,
setup is the same
Portal (JavaOne 2010 "Duke's Award Winner")
http://www.myuniportal.com
- Original Message
From: "Caldarale, Charles R"
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:15:40 AM
Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
> From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bp
Good Afternoon:
I am attempting to run a Windows x64 server with IIS7 and Tomcat 7. I have
64 bit versions of JDK (1.6.26) and Tomcat (7.0.8). The server is set up
with IIS using ajp1.3 to a local cluster of Tomcat servers. In performance
tests I have found the configuration runs dramaticall
ce it, so that I can fix it/work around it. I will
open a bugzilla item with this
In the meantime, does this still happen if you remove the "bind" attribute?
best
Filip
On 02/22/2011 04:02 PM, Bruce Pease wrote:
> Good Afternoon:
>
>
>
> I am running Windows server 200
Good Afternoon:
I am running Windows server 2008 with Oracle/Sun jdk 1.6u24 and Tomcat 7.0.8.
Windows server 2008 multicast is defaulted on. I am attempting to set up a
cluster (config that currenly works in Windows server 2000 and tomcat 6), and
getting the exception listed below. I haven't
13 matches
Mail list logo