Re: CSRF not working with 10.1.42 but it works with 10.1.39

2025-06-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/06/2025 14:28, Hrvoje Lončar wrote: Thanks! 50 as default would be much better and I guess it will cover the most of cases. Just out of curiosity, does CSRF protection implemented hepls with attack or it does not matter? On its own, CSRF protection won't help you here. However, CSRF prot

Re: CSRF not working with 10.1.42 but it works with 10.1.39

2025-06-24 Thread Hrvoje Lončar
Thanks! 50 as default would be much better and I guess it will cover the most of cases. Just out of curiosity, does CSRF protection implemented hepls with attack or it does not matter? On Mon, 23 Jun 2025, 09:02 Mark Thomas, wrote: > On 23/06/2025 01:17, Hrvoje Lončar wrote: > > If someone else