Hi Mark,
Looking at the Tapestry-IoC Registry code I notice that although it
constructs a (plastic) service proxy object, it does cast it to its
associated interface before making it available from the registry's
getService() method. So if I move the WebSocket annotations to my
interface as previ
On 24/04/2019 02:10, Richard Huntrods wrote:
> I have confirmed with my email provider that tomcat.apache.org does
> indeed have nucleus.com on a blacklist. I can provide proof if needed,
> but I do need to get nucleus.com REMOVED from this blacklist.
Please provide your proof - to users-ow...@tom
I have confirmed with my email provider that tomcat.apache.org does
indeed have nucleus.com on a blacklist. I can provide proof if needed,
but I do need to get nucleus.com REMOVED from this blacklist.
Thank you.
-Richard
On 4/23/2019 9:14 AM, Richard Huntrods wrote:
I'm still not receiving an
Based on what you wrote regarding WebSocket annotations not following Java
inheritance, I imagine the below wouldn't work either.
public class MyServerEndpointConfig extends ServerEndpointConfig {
@Override
public Class getEndpointClass() {
return MyServiceInterface.class;
}
> The custom Configurator looks fine. The problem is with trying to do
> this with a POJO endpoint. There is an underlying assumption that - for
> a POJO endpoint - the endpoints will will instances of the POJO class.
> This doesn't seem to hold in your case so hence it breaks.
>
> The WebSocket sp
On 4/23/2019 5:46 PM, Garret Wilson wrote:
3. Since the temporary working directory is on a per-context basis,
and I've only set the "basedir" for the entire `Tomcat` instance,
Tomcat must be determining a default temporary directory for the
context. Surely I'm allowed to explicitly specify a t
On 4/22/2019 7:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2019 15:53, Garret Wilson wrote:
…
But now I realize Tomcat is creating this directory structur inside the
"base dir" I specified:
tomcat.8080/work/Tomcat/localhost/ROOT
I don't need this directory. I don't want this directory created. How do
I
This message has been marked as UC group - PUBLIC
Yes I used the official guide and triple checked everything like 10 times. I am
uninstalling it now and trying to do it from scratch at this point
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 201
On 23/04/2019 20:32, Shpilsky Rita (UniCredit Services) wrote:
> This message has been marked asUC group - PUBLIC
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have tomcat 9.0.16 installed on windows 2012 server, 64 bit version
>
> I went through all the steps including getting the isapi_redirect.dll in
> 64 bit version
On 4/23/19 10:28 PM, Pablo Salazar wrote:
Hi Zero,
Not Yet.
DO you recomend it??
REgards,
Pablo Salazar
No I don't know, I am curious about that.
Regards, Harm-Jan Z.
-Original Message-
From: Zero [mailto:hz0...@gmail.com]
Sent: martes, 23 de abril de 2019 03:26 p.m.
To: us
Hi Zero,
Not Yet.
DO you recomend it??
REgards,
Pablo Salazar
-Original Message-
From: Zero [mailto:hz0...@gmail.com]
Sent: martes, 23 de abril de 2019 03:26 p.m.
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: It's possible run PHP on Tomcat 8 without use Quercus?
On 4/23/19 9:55 PM, Pab
On 4/23/19 9:55 PM, Pablo Salazar wrote:
Thanks Chris,
Do you know if exist some GUIDE to configure Tomcat 8 for run php files???
Regards,
Pablo Salazar
Out of curiosity, did you try PHP-JavaBridge ?
Regards, Harm-Jan Z.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch..
Thanks Chris,
Do you know if exist some GUIDE to configure Tomcat 8 for run php files???
Regards,
Pablo Salazar
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: martes, 23 de abril de 2019 09:15 a.m.
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: It's
This message has been marked as UC group - PUBLIC
Hi,
I have tomcat 9.0.16 installed on windows 2012 server, 64 bit version
I went through all the steps including getting the isapi_redirect.dll in 64 bit
version, but when I try to open one of the applications residing in webapps
folder of tomc
I'm still not receiving any email from either 'users@tomcat.apache.org'
or 'users-dig...@tomcat.apache.org' - not since the tomcat listserv
server crash in early April.
I asked my mail server provider to check their logs, and this is the
reply I received yesterday:
Hello Richard,
I receive
On 23/04/2019 16:12, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Olivier,
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for you answer.
On 4/23/19 05:58, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
Hi all,
We were able to reproduce a OutOfMemory error when using AJP and
the Resources cachingAllowed=false directive. It looks like a bug
of AJP connector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Pablo,
On 4/23/19 08:44, Pablo Salazar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am lookling for a solution to my problema.
>
> I have Tomcat 8 installet with Quercus for run PHP, but recently I
> need load Imagick module for a new funcionality on my page, but on
> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Olivier,
On 4/23/19 05:58, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We were able to reproduce a OutOfMemory error when using AJP and
> the Resources cachingAllowed=false directive. It looks like a bug
> of AJP connector(s), as it does not occurs with
Hi,
I am lookling for a solution to my problema.
I have Tomcat 8 installet with Quercus for run PHP, but recently I need load
Imagick module for a new funcionality on my page, but on the GUIDES of Imagick,
it’s needed to use php.ini of PHP intsdallation, but Quercus don’t have that
file.
I ha
Hi all,
We were able to reproduce a OutOfMemory error when using AJP and the
Resources cachingAllowed=false directive.
It looks like a bug of AJP connector(s), as it does not occurs with
other HTTP connectors.
Could you confirm the behavior described below is indeed bug ? (if you
do, I'll cr
20 matches
Mail list logo