Hi !
English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.
Why is Tomcat not handling requests with 8 versions, but in the RUNNABLE
state, not the TIME_WAITING state of the Tomcat 7 version?
Please confirm that this operation works normally.
#Tomcat 7.0.75 jdk
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply. Comments inline:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:31 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Behrooz,
>
> On 3/26/18 12:26 AM, Behrooz Nobakht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am migrating a code base
On 3/26/2018 2:39 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> Just a question, more to satisfy my curiosity : when you have these
> hundreds of "pending" connections, in what state are they, TCP/IP-wise ?
Not sure where you got "pending". I don't recall mentioning anything
like that.
The TCP state is ES
Hi.
A question at the end.
On 26.03.2018 22:01, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/26/2018 11:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The pool doesn't kill abandoned connections. It simply removes them
from the pool. Otherwise, you're right: you'd have torches and
pitchforks everywhere.
That is a key piece o
On 3/26/2018 11:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> The pool doesn't kill abandoned connections. It simply removes them
> from the pool. Otherwise, you're right: you'd have torches and
> pitchforks everywhere.
That is a key piece of information. And it should have perhaps been
obvious from the de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Behrooz,
On 3/26/18 12:26 AM, Behrooz Nobakht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating a code base from Tomcat 8.0.38 to 9.0.6. There are a
> few things I'd like to confirm based on observations so far and ask
> for advice:
>
> 1. Default Class Loader
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 3/25/18 12:17 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Regarding your configuration: > auth="Container"
>> factory="org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory"
>> driverClassName="com.mysql.jdbc.Drive
Hi
On 24 March 2018 at 23:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/03/18 15:00, Richard Tearle wrote:
>> On 22 March 2018 at 23:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 22/03/18 15:27, Richard Tearle wrote:
On 22 March 2018 at 14:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> I've taken another look at the configurat
