On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/12/17 18:49, Chris Cheshire wrote:
>> I have a directory resource set defined in my context.xml to handle images :
>>
>>
>> > base="${catalina.base}/cdn/p/images"
>> webAppMount="/images" />
>>
>>
>> The
Hello,
I confirm I didn't receive Christopher answer (it seems I am not alone, so
maybe there was an issue):
http://mail-archives.us.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-users/201711.mbox/%3c2339f4d3-91fd-3be2-dd18-26e0f6262...@christopherschultz.net%3e
Anyway, now I read it, thank you Christopher !
Regard
On 08/12/17 19:29, Jesse Schulman wrote:
> Got it, that works and I was able to accomplish exactly what I needed,
> thank you!
>
> One side note, the name ended up being:
> "Tomcat:name=\"https-jsse-nio-8443\",type=ThreadPool"
>
> Which is a different order than your example so I am using the
> O
On 08/12/17 18:49, Chris Cheshire wrote:
> I have a directory resource set defined in my context.xml to handle images :
>
>
>base="${catalina.base}/cdn/p/images"
> webAppMount="/images" />
>
>
> The /p in there actually represents the context path - a given s
Got it, that works and I was able to accomplish exactly what I needed,
thank you!
One side note, the name ended up being:
"Tomcat:name=\"https-jsse-nio-8443\",type=ThreadPool"
Which is a different order than your example so I am using the
ObjectName(String domain, Hashtable table) constructor so
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Chris,
>
> On 12/7/17 2:08 PM, Chris Cheshire wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
What should the permissions, owner & group be set to
I have a directory resource set defined in my context.xml to handle images :
The /p in there actually represents the context path - a given sandbox
might have the same webapp deployed at different context paths
representing different development branches. Is it possible to use a
replacement
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Chris,
>
> On 12/7/17 3:47 PM, Chris Cheshire wrote:
>> Apologies in advance for semi-OT sysadmin question.
>>
>> Tomcat 8.5.24, running on Centos 6. I have built jsvc according to
>
On 08.12.2017 17:05, Satish Chhatpar 02 wrote:
We have are using Apache 2.4.6 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2
(Maipo)
My objective is to find out the default values for maxrequestworkers, as we
have not configured any specific value.
and Also we have not configured any speci
Hi Philippe-
I'm new to the list, and didn't see the previous response either, but I
just did this recently do a similar config so I might have some guidance.
Where you have algorithm="*SHA-256*", for digest.sh too, you shouldn't need
the asterisks. Why are you using those?
> Set the last part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 12/7/17 3:47 PM, Chris Cheshire wrote:
> Apologies in advance for semi-OT sysadmin question.
>
> Tomcat 8.5.24, running on Centos 6. I have built jsvc according to
> instructions in distribution. I have two tomcat instances under
> diff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
George,
On 12/7/17 2:39 PM, George S. wrote:
> Could someone please add me (George Sexton) to the contributor
> group on the Tomcat Wiki?
Done?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 12/7/17 2:08 PM, Chris Cheshire wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>>>
>>> What should the permissions, owner & group be set to for
>>> CATALINA_HOME if I am running separate instances per user?
>>
>
We have are using Apache 2.4.6 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2
(Maipo)
My objective is to find out the default values for maxrequestworkers, as we
have not configured any specific value.
and Also we have not configured any specific MPM, so My question is
Which one is used by
On 07/12/17 15:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/12/17 02:52, Nitkalya (Ing) Wiriyanuparb wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm upgrading from Tomcat 7.0.30 to 8.5.24. Everything is working fine, but
>> I notice that BeanELResolver behaves differently when calling a bean
>> varargs method with no argument.
>>
>>
Hi Mark,
Sorry but I didn't receive the reply otherwise I wouldn't be asking again.
I'll see the archives then.
Thanks
Regards
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/12/17 21:24, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Last ping hoping to get some help.
>
> If you aren't goin
On 08/12/17 08:32, Robert J. Carr wrote:
> Hi Mark-
>
> Thanks for the quick reply and I'll look into Authenticators.
>
> Since you suggest 8.5.x, does that mean I was on the right track with
> JASPIC?
Yes, you can do this with JASPIC and a third-party JASPIC module:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tom
Hi Mark-
Thanks for the quick reply and I'll look into Authenticators.
Since you suggest 8.5.x, does that mean I was on the right track with
JASPIC?
Thanks again!
Robert
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/12/17 07:08, Robert J. Carr wrote:
> > [tomcat 8, java 8, ubu
On 08/12/17 07:08, Robert J. Carr wrote:
> [tomcat 8, java 8, ubuntu xenial]
>
> I have setup security constraints that allow certain resources to only be
> accessed by authorized users. The users are authenticated using either
> BASIC or FORM, where a username and password is provided, and this w
On 07/12/17 21:24, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hello,
> Last ping hoping to get some help.
If you aren't going to read the replies Chris has already given you to
your original question and your subsequent ping there isn't much more we
can do to help you.
Mark
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017
20 matches
Mail list logo
