Hi,
I am tracking down a fairly sporadic bug in our software that uses Tomcat
8.0.38. Long story short, sometimes calls to Basic.sendBinary() to a full
buffer then to a small buffer (eg. 8192x3 then 444 bytes). The first 8192
sends will succeed and occasionally we see the last 444 byte send 'fail'
Hi,
I am tracking down a fairly sporadic bug in our software that uses Tomcat
8.0.38. Long story short, sometimes calls to Basic.sendBinary() to a full
buffer then to a small buffer (eg. 8192x3 then 444 bytes). The first 8192
sends will succeed and occasionally we see the last 444 byte send 'fail'
2017-03-28 1:04 GMT+03:00 Olaf Kock :
>
>
> Am 27.03.2017 um 23:11 schrieb André Warnier (tomcat):
>> On 27.03.2017 23:03, Scott, Derric T wrote:
>>> I ran into a snag and finally identified the culprit. The tomcat on
>>> the backend went from 1.0.14 to 1.0.69.
>> As far as I know, there exists no
Am 27.03.2017 um 23:11 schrieb André Warnier (tomcat):
> On 27.03.2017 23:03, Scott, Derric T wrote:
>> I ran into a snag and finally identified the culprit. The tomcat on
>> the backend went from 1.0.14 to 1.0.69.
> As far as I know, there exists no such Tomcat version. Where did you
> get this
2017-03-28 0:03 GMT+03:00 Scott, Derric T :
> Hello:
>
> A question, perhaps a bug...
>
> I inherited a large application that has Apache in front, tomcat in back via
> AJP1.3. I am moving everything to
> "new" verisons. A new RedHat OS, newest tomcat RPM (7.0.69), etc.
>
> I ran into a snag an
On 27.03.2017 23:03, Scott, Derric T wrote:
Hello:
A question, perhaps a bug...
I inherited a large application that has Apache in front, tomcat in back via
AJP1.3. I am moving everything to
"new" verisons. A new RedHat OS, newest tomcat RPM (7.0.69), etc.
I ran into a snag and finally ide
Hello:
A question, perhaps a bug...
I inherited a large application that has Apache in front, tomcat in back via
AJP1.3. I am moving everything to
"new" verisons. A new RedHat OS, newest tomcat RPM (7.0.69), etc.
I ran into a snag and finally identified the culprit. The tomcat on the
backe
On 27/03/17 11:39, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
On 27.03.2017 10:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/03/17 09:26, Olaf Kock wrote:
Other options that I can envision is to change Jasper's implementation
to keep serving a compiled JSP until the replacement has been properly
compiled and loaded in th
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:31:51PM +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Does there exists a small helper tool that can create the minimum necessary
> directories and files in a new CATALINA-BASE directory ? Or a template zip
> file or something like this?
>
> Such a tool would be helpful, because I alwa
On 27.03.2017 13:07, Alfie Patolilic wrote:
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 11:12
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: LDAP authentication for Tomcat's webapp 'Opengrok'
On 27.03.2017 11:01, Alfie Patolilic wrote:
Tomcat V
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 11:12
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: LDAP authentication for Tomcat's webapp 'Opengrok'
On 27.03.2017 11:01, Alfie Patolilic wrote:
> Tomcat Version : 6.0.36
> OS : Red Hat Enterprise Li
On 27.03.2017 11:01, Alfie Patolilic wrote:
Tomcat Version : 6.0.36
OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3
Hello,
I have a question on how I am able to set the following, regarding the web
application that runs under Apache Tomcat, 'Opengrok'. The idea is to set a
hostname for 'localhost:8080/grok
On 27.03.2017 10:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/03/17 09:26, Olaf Kock wrote:
Other options that I can envision is to change Jasper's implementation
to keep serving a compiled JSP until the replacement has been properly
compiled and loaded in the background (e.g. not having compilation block
fu
Tomcat Version : 6.0.36
OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3
Hello,
I have a question on how I am able to set the following, regarding the web
application that runs under Apache Tomcat, 'Opengrok'. The idea is to set a
hostname for 'localhost:8080/grok', so when users try and access the page via
Tomcat Version : 6.0.36
OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3
Hello,
I have a question on how I am able to set the following, regarding the web
application that runs under Apache Tomcat, 'Opengrok'. The idea is to set a
hostname for 'localhost:8080/grok', so when users try and access the page via
Alfie Patolilic would like to recall the message, "LDAP authentication for
Tomcat's webapp 'Opengrok'".
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 27/03/17 09:26, Olaf Kock wrote:
> Other options that I can envision is to change Jasper's implementation
> to keep serving a compiled JSP until the replacement has been properly
> compiled and loaded in the background (e.g. not having compilation block
> further requests to the same page). I
Alfie Patolilic would like to recall the message, "LDAP authentication for
Tomcat's webapp 'Opengrok'".
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Am 27.03.2017 um 09:30 schrieb Joan Tomàs i Buliart:
> Hello,
>
> We currently deploy our JSPs outside of the WAR. This allows us to
> deploy the main application container and the JSP views at different
> pace (one team moves much faster than the other). In order to support
> this, we have JSPs
Hello,
We currently deploy our JSPs outside of the WAR. This allows us to
deploy the main
application container and the JSP views at different pace (one team
moves much faster than
the other). In order to support this, we have JSPs out of the war.
When the webapp is
deployed some soft-links
On 27.03.2017 09:30, Joan Tomàs i Buliart wrote:
Hello,
We currently deploy our JSPs outside of the WAR. This allows us to deploy the
main
application container and the JSP views at different pace (one team moves much
faster than
the other). In order to support this, we have JSPs out of the w
Hello,
We currently deploy our JSPs outside of the WAR. This allows us to
deploy the main application container and the JSP views at different
pace (one team moves much faster than the other). In order to support
this, we have JSPs out of the war. When the webapp is deployed some
soft-links
22 matches
Mail list logo
