Re: ELContext no longer available to tagfiles

2017-03-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/03/17 22:52, Mike Strauch wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Mike Strauch > wrote: >> ... I’ll take a look. > > Appears to be working. Thanks again! Great. Thanks for the confirmation. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: ELContext no longer available to tagfiles

2017-03-24 Thread Mike Strauch
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > I think I have fixed this. The fix includes a simplistic test case. > Verification of the fix would be appreciated. > > Mark Hey Mark, Apologies, I just noticed your reply. I see the fix in the 8.0.42 release. I’ll take a look. -- Mike S

Re: ELContext no longer available to tagfiles

2017-03-24 Thread Mike Strauch
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Mike Strauch wrote: > ... I’ll take a look. Appears to be working. Thanks again! -- Mike Strauch Lead Software Engineer, Hannon Hill w. www.hannonhill.com e mike.stra...@hannonhill.com - To u

Re: Tomcat Not Responding (Resolved)

2017-03-24 Thread Igal @ Lucee.org
Chris, On 3/24/2017 2:13 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Igal, On 3/24/17 1:22 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: I've traced the issue to an NPE thrown from my servlet. I patched it (https://github.com/lucee/Lucee/commit/0f30a7ef) and now it works fin

Re: siteMinder implementation for our application

2017-03-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Amith, On 3/24/17 2:32 PM, Kikkeri, Amith wrote: > Our application runs on tomcat7 (Port 80) and we don't use a web > server. We are implementing SSO and planning to use siteMinder. > When trying to install siteMinder web agent, we realized that it

Re: Tomcat Not Responding (Resolved)

2017-03-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Igal, On 3/24/17 1:22 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > On 3/23/2017 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> If Tomcat is unresponsive, that would suggest a problem with >> either the Acceptor or the Poller but both of those threads look >> normal to. >> >> You

Re: ForkJoinPool behaviour changed from 9.0.0-M15 to 9.0.0-M17

2017-03-24 Thread Francesco Bassi
Thanks a lot. Your support is great and appropriate, as usual. I still think there's something wrong with this topic, but more on the Java 8 side. I'll do some more investigations and, in case, involve them! --fb On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24 March 2017 17:51:27 G

Re: ForkJoinPool behaviour changed from 9.0.0-M15 to 9.0.0-M17

2017-03-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24 March 2017 17:51:27 GMT+00:00, Francesco Bassi wrote: >Hello. >I have a weird problem that happens only wih tomcat 9.0.0-M17+: > >- I need to process a parallel java stream inside a custom ForkJoinPool > >If I run the code with 9.0.0-M15, I see that all the threads are >properly >created usi

siteMinder implementation for our application

2017-03-24 Thread Kikkeri, Amith
Hi, Our application runs on tomcat7 (Port 80) and we don't use a web server. We are implementing SSO and planning to use siteMinder. When trying to install siteMinder web agent, we realized that it is not recognizing tomcat. Please let me know if there is an option to make siteMinder webagent w

ForkJoinPool behaviour changed from 9.0.0-M15 to 9.0.0-M17

2017-03-24 Thread Francesco Bassi
Hello. I have a weird problem that happens only wih tomcat 9.0.0-M17+: - I need to process a parallel java stream inside a custom ForkJoinPool If I run the code with 9.0.0-M15, I see that all the threads are properly created using my factory. If I run the code with 9.0.0-M17+, some of the thread

RE: location of tomcat-juli.jar

2017-03-24 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 12:00 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: location of tomcat-juli.jar > > On 24 March 2017 16:06:21 GMT+00:00, Jeffrey Janner > wrote: > >I was re-reading the RUNNING.txt to see why I

Re: Aw: Re: Was bug 58646 (NullPointerException in InternalNioOutputBuffer) also fixed for 8.5.5?

2017-03-24 Thread Andrew Garland
Mark, FYI I created https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60918 which is a bug report for 8.5.11 with similar characteristics to the one reported in bug 58646 -- View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/Was-bug-58646-NullPointerException-in-InternalNioOutputBuffer

Re: Tomcat Not Responding (Resolved)

2017-03-24 Thread Igal @ Lucee.org
On 3/23/2017 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: If Tomcat is unresponsive, that would suggest a problem with either the Acceptor or the Poller but both of those threads look normal to. You are going to need to do some more debugging. Ideally, you need to configure your favourite IDE to do remote debug

Re: location of tomcat-juli.jar

2017-03-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24 March 2017 16:06:21 GMT+00:00, Jeffrey Janner wrote: >I was re-reading the RUNNING.txt to see why I had to copy >tomcat-juli.jar to the CATALINA_BASE/bin directory instead of just >having it run out of CATALINA_HOME/bin. >It seemed annoying to me to have to copy it to all my CATALINA_BASE

Re: location of tomcat-juli.jar

2017-03-24 Thread Igal @ Lucee.org
I'm using different directories for CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE without copying the bin directory to BASE. Never had an issue with it. Be sure to have the full path of tomcat-juli.jar in the Java Classpath setting. That's what matters to Java. You can place the Jar file anywhere you wan

location of tomcat-juli.jar

2017-03-24 Thread Jeffrey Janner
I was re-reading the RUNNING.txt to see why I had to copy tomcat-juli.jar to the CATALINA_BASE/bin directory instead of just having it run out of CATALINA_HOME/bin. It seemed annoying to me to have to copy it to all my CATALINA_BASE instances every time I upgraded, but I thought I ran into pro