On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 20:13, Jesse Schulman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:48 PM Jesse Schulman
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:08 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/01/2017 21:05, Jesse Schulman wrote:
> >>> We are using tomcat-emb
>
> Embedded Tomcat and microservices? With and as an alternative to Spring
> Boot?
>
> -Terence Bandoian
> http://www.tmbsw.com/
>
>
+1. Something to do with using Tomcat within a microservices architecture,
possibly with Docker and Kubernetes.
2017-01-09 1:16 GMT-06:00 Patil, Shital :
> We are assessing Java 9(early access) and JSP compilation is badly broken
> with Java 9. Even basic java objects(java.lang.Object) are not accessible
> while compilation. Appears to be because of jigsaw(modular)
>
> Any solution or alternative to this pr
On 09/01/2017 20:13, Jesse Schulman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:48 PM Jesse Schulman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:08 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 05/01/2017 21:05, Jesse Schulman wrote:
>>> We are using tomcat-embed 8.5.9, java8 and running on Centos7. Given
>>> Tomcat's new sup
On 09/01/2017 19:57, Christopher Zinn wrote:
> Thanks for the information. I was not expecting such a great response so
> quickly.
>
> We are going to test the workaround that sets the java.util.concurrent.
> ForkJoinPool.common.threadFactory property as that will be the easiest for
> us to confi
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:48 PM Jesse Schulman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:08 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 05/01/2017 21:05, Jesse Schulman wrote:
> > We are using tomcat-embed 8.5.9, java8 and running on Centos7. Given
> > Tomcat's new support for SNI, we wish to support adding/removing/u
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
> On 1/9/2017 8:00 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>> On 01/09/2017 12:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> There is the opportunity (if we can pull it together as a community) to
>>> run a dedicated Tomcat conference alongside
Thanks for the information. I was not expecting such a great response so
quickly.
We are going to test the workaround that sets the java.util.concurrent.
ForkJoinPool.common.threadFactory property as that will be the easiest for
us to configure and deploy to our Tomcat instances.
- Chris
On M
On 1/9/2017 8:00 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 01/09/2017 12:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
There is the opportunity (if we can pull it together as a community) to
run a dedicated Tomcat conference alongside ApacheCon NA 2017. The dates
are May 16 to 18.
The call for papers closes on Feb 1
Would anyone be interested (and is it within the guidelines) to talk
about the differences in some tomcat distributions? Like the
difference in the Red Hat linux and Debian tomcat distributions, for
example. I know it isn't 100% ASF Tomcat, but I get a lot of inquiries
about where to find stuff on
On 1/9/2017 3:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
"What topic(s) need to be covered in a Tomcat conference to make it as
easy as possible to get your employer to pay for you to attend?"
load balancing
performance
security
-
To unsubsc
On 09/01/2017 14:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2017 22:04, Christopher Zinn wrote:
>>We are running into an issue where we have multiple copies of the same
>> WAR loaded on a Tomcat instance each with its own context.xml.
>> The initial problem I was trying to diagnose was A JNDI lookup
Hi, I am upgrading from Tomcat 8.0.33 to 8.5.9.
I have the following error during a POST made with Apache-HttpClient 4.3.6
I this this is the bad "POST"
FINE Jan 09, 2017 3:45:15 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11InputBuffer
parseRequestLine
BUONO: Received [POST /majordodo HTTP/1.1
Transfer-Enco
Hi Mark,
For reproducing, if you're making the requests locally to the server that
might be why you're not seeing the issue occur. I had been testing between
servers (client on server A, tomcat on server B); I tried this morning
doing a wget locally to tomcat and do not see the issue occur (no
WSA
On 08/01/2017 22:04, Christopher Zinn wrote:
> Hello all,
>This is my first time posting to a mailing list so hopefully I'm doing
> this correctly.
Welcome to the Apache Tomcat community.
As problem reports go, this is pretty much perfect. And it includes a
simple test case. Many, many thanks
2017-01-09 10:16 GMT+03:00 Patil, Shital :
> We are assessing Java 9(early access) and JSP compilation is badly broken
> with Java 9. Even basic java objects(java.lang.Object) are not accessible
> while compilation. Appears to be because of jigsaw(modular)
>
> Any solution or alternative to this
Hi everyone,
just in case the "final" solution is of interest: the problem was as usual
in the configuration. We did not set the following directive for the LDAP
connection pool:
LDAPConnectionPoolTTL #seconds
If the directive is missing, a value of "-1" is implied, meaning "keep
connections op
On 01/09/2017 12:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> There is the opportunity (if we can pull it together as a community) to
> run a dedicated Tomcat conference alongside ApacheCon NA 2017. The dates
> are May 16 to 18.
>
> The call for papers closes on Feb 11 so we have around a month to get
>
I would like to understand garbage collections better. Such as what
instances or situations experienced someone would make a change to a
setting.
Thank you,
Joleen
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> There is the opportunity (if we can pull it together as a community)
On 09/01/2017 07:16, Patil, Shital wrote:
> We are assessing Java 9(early access) and JSP compilation is badly
> broken with Java 9. Even basic java objects(java.lang.Object) are not
> accessible while compilation. Appears to be because of
> jigsaw(modular)
>
> Any solution or alternative to this
All,
There is the opportunity (if we can pull it together as a community) to
run a dedicated Tomcat conference alongside ApacheCon NA 2017. The dates
are May 16 to 18.
The call for papers closes on Feb 11 so we have around a month to get
organised. We'll also need to convince the conference organ
21 matches
Mail list logo
