Re: Tomcat-7.0.61 and SFlow_Valve.jar issue

Am 11. August 2015 23:32:12 MESZ, schrieb Sergey : >I recompiled SFlow_Valve.jar with Tomcat-7.0.61. >Now it doesn’t give any errors in the log, but also doesn’t send any >metrics to port 6343. >Is there any way to debug this valve? I assume it is this valve https://code.google.com/p/tomcat-sf

Re: Tomcat 8 jspx and HTML5

On 8 August 2015 at 06:54, Konstantin Preißer wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 2:32 PM > > > > This is a common problem, and the reason for it is that for > > some reas

Re: Tomcat-7.0.61 and SFlow_Valve.jar issue

I recompiled SFlow_Valve.jar with Tomcat-7.0.61. Now it doesn’t give any errors in the log, but also doesn’t send any metrics to port 6343. Is there any way to debug this valve? Thanks!Sergey > >> On Jul 23, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Violeta Georgieva > > wrote: >> >> H

Re: NullPointerException in NioEndpoint under load (but not only)

Hello, Never had any feedback on this, but I think I'm running into this bug: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57943 At least, setting the socket.bufferPool to 0 tremendously helped and I am not seeing this excpetion anymore. Waiting for 7.0.64 release to upgrade but I have good

Re: RequestDispatcher.forward between 2 virtual hosts defined in the same Tomcat container

On 06/08/2015 13:40, Neha Munjal wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if we can do servlet forwarding between 2 different > webapps deployed on 2 different virtual hosts configured in the same Tomcat > container. No. Mark > > So, I have configured 2 different virtual hosts in my Tomcat serve

Re: Fwd: FailedRequestFilter IOHandling

On 10/08/2015 21:05, wadzapi wrote: > Hello! I'm WadZapi - JEE developer from Russia. You'll notice you haven't received a response in almost 24 hours. I'll note that cross-posting user questions to the dev list is more likely to annoy the people who can answer your question that it is likely to

Re: AW: Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111

On 11/08/2015 20:03, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Chinoy, > > On 8/8/15 10:47 AM, Chinoy Gupta wrote: >> Is the trunk stable? > > Fairly. But there is a tag for 1.2.41 if you'd rather use that. It's > not yet an official ASF release, though. But it does have 3 +1 binding votes to release and it

Re: AW: Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Chinoy, On 8/8/15 10:47 AM, Chinoy Gupta wrote: > Is the trunk stable? Fairly. But there is a tag for 1.2.41 if you'd rather use that. It's not yet an official ASF release, though. - -chris > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 5:42 pm, Christopher Schultz >