Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Gero, On 12/15/14 8:33 AM, gch...@gmx.de wrote: > we used to deploy our webapp in a tomcat 6.0.35 and want to upgrade > to tomcat 8.0.9. During testing we discovered, that the startup > process of tomcat 8 is twice as long as the startup process of

Re: Lambda expression question on Tomcat_8_0_15

On 15/12/2014 21:13, David Wall wrote: > On 12/15/2014 12:19 PM, Anup Aggarwal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am new to learn the LambdaExpression , and I am trying to run a test >> with >> JDK7 on Tomcat_8_0_15 server > > Don't you need JDK8 for Lamdas? Not in this case, no. The EL 3.0 specification incl

Re: Lambda expression question on Tomcat_8_0_15

On 12/15/2014 12:19 PM, Anup Aggarwal wrote: Hi, I am new to learn the LambdaExpression , and I am trying to run a test with JDK7 on Tomcat_8_0_15 server Don't you need JDK8 for Lamdas? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubs

Re: Lambda expression question on Tomcat_8_0_15

On 15/12/2014 20:19, Anup Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to learn the LambdaExpression , and I am trying to run a test with > JDK7 on Tomcat_8_0_15 server > > protected void doGet... { > ELProcessor elp = new ELProcessor(); > sos.println("Test: " + (LambdaExpression)

Lambda expression question on Tomcat_8_0_15

Hi, I am new to learn the LambdaExpression , and I am trying to run a test with JDK7 on Tomcat_8_0_15 server protected void doGet... { ELProcessor elp = new ELProcessor(); sos.println("Test: " + (LambdaExpression) elp.eval("()->64")); } But I always get this error java.

Re: Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, gch...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hello Daniel, > > thank you very much for your quick reply. > Sure, np. One quick note, on this list we prefer posters to not top post. Either reply inline like me or at the bottom. It's convention we've landed on to help make reading t

Aw: Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

Hello Muralidhar, thank you for your quick reply. I realize that the absolute startup time in my test is not very long. What concerns me is the difference between the startup times of tomcat 6 and tomcat 8 with the very same application. I wonder, if the longer startup time could be the resul

Aw: Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

Hello Daniel, thank you very much for your quick reply. Comparing the startup times for Tomcat 6.0.35 and Tomcat 8.0.15 without any apps deployed (and without any tuning, such as disabling jar scanning) shows me that Tomcat 8.0.15 is much faster than Tomcat 6.0.35 (53 ms opposed to 933 ms). Th

Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Yaragalla Muralidhar < yaragallamur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > for me it is taking more than that. I have deployed a simple war file. How simple? What about when you run it without any apps deployed? How fast does it startup then? > It took so long to deploy it.

Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:33 AM, gch...@gmx.de wrote: > > > > Hi, > > we used to deploy our webapp in a tomcat 6.0.35 and want to upgrade to > tomcat 8.0.9. > Try the latest Tomcat 8 release, 8.0.15, and see if that helps. > During testing we discovered, that the startup process of tomcat 8 is

Re: Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

for me it is taking more than that. I have deployed a simple war file. It took so long to deploy it. omcat-8.0.15\webapps\ROOT has finished in 240 ms 15-Dec-2014 19:08:32.348 INFO [main] org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol.start St arting ProtocolHandler ["http-nio-8080"] 15-Dec-2014 19:08:32.357 I

Startup of tomcat 8 takes twice as long as startup of tomcat 6

Hi, we used to deploy our webapp in a tomcat 6.0.35 and want to upgrade to tomcat 8.0.9. During testing we discovered, that the startup process of tomcat 8 is twice as long as the startup process of tomcat 6 (with the same single webapp deployed) My test system is as follows: Windows 7, JRE 1

Re: Problem At Installing Tomcat 8.0.15...

try to open tomcat.exe in cmd promt. it will list what the problem is. *Thanks and Regards,* Muralidhar Yaragalla. *http://yaragalla.blogspot.in/ * On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Krishnachaithanya As < krishnachaithanya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All.. > > I've

Problem At Installing Tomcat 8.0.15...

Hi All.. I've downloaded Apache Tomcat 8.0.15 and facing problem while trying to install it. I'm not able to open tomcat.exe and if I'm trying to do so, command prompt is automatically closes with in a second. Please help me to crack this issue by providing detailed steps. -- Thanks & Regards

Re: Tomcat 8 + mod_jk + apache 2.2x on FreeBSD

Aurélien Terrestris writes: >>I get Tomcat default home page, but images and CSS are not loaded: > > All resources are not available and all links are broken. This happens > because you're proxyfying to /dspace but Tomcat "ROOT" webapp is > written for the "/" context > > http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/

Re: Tomcat 8 + mod_jk + apache 2.2x on FreeBSD

On 15/12/2014 08:37, Aurélien Terrestris wrote: >> I get Tomcat default home page, but images and CSS are not loaded: > > All resources are not available and all links are broken. This happens > because you're proxyfying to /dspace but Tomcat "ROOT" webapp is > written for the "/" context Changin

Re: Tomcat 8 + mod_jk + apache 2.2x on FreeBSD

>I get Tomcat default home page, but images and CSS are not loaded: All resources are not available and all links are broken. This happens because you're proxyfying to /dspace but Tomcat "ROOT" webapp is written for the "/" context http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/dspace/docs/manager-howto.html then works

Re: Tomcat 8 + mod_jk + apache 2.2x on FreeBSD

Aurélien, > if Apache and Tomcat are running on the same machine, the tcpdump > won't capture the trafic because the proxy requests are using the > loopback interface and not the ethernet port. tcpdump -i lo0 ;) > Instead of using the "workers" properties and the mod-jk section, you > could try