Re: Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread David kerber
On 12/4/2014 4:32 PM, Jason Ricles wrote: Yes it was a bug so we will try to get a waiver to use 7.0.57 for our environment instead of 7.0.53 So it works as expected in 7.0.57? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ricles wrote: Well the trace is fine so I will upgrade and try and see wha

Re: Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread Jason Ricles
Yes it was a bug so we will try to get a waiver to use 7.0.57 for our environment instead of 7.0.53 On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ricles wrote: > Well the trace is fine so I will upgrade and try and see what happens. > If it is not fixed I assume I should file a bug report. > > On Thu, De

Single Sign On Replication with New Tomcat Cluster Nodes

2014-12-04 Thread Aaron R
Hello, I have a Tomcat cluster (7.0.42) that is configured to use the DeltaManager for session replication. It also uses the ClusterSingleSignOn valve for SSO and for propagating authentication to the other nodes in the cluster. If I log into Tomcat1, the session state and the single sign on state

Re: Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread Jason Ricles
Well the trace is fine so I will upgrade and try and see what happens. If it is not fixed I assume I should file a bug report. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 04/12/2014 18:04, Jason Ricles wrote: >> Due to some regulations out of my control right now we can only use >> to

Re: Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread Mark Thomas
On 04/12/2014 18:04, Jason Ricles wrote: > Due to some regulations out of my control right now we can only use > tomcat 7.0.53. I also did a wireshark bug trace and going over the > line the reserved bits are 0 but when computed in tomcat that is when > the reserved are set to invalid bits. Is ther

Re: Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread Jason Ricles
Due to some regulations out of my control right now we can only use tomcat 7.0.53. I also did a wireshark bug trace and going over the line the reserved bits are 0 but when computed in tomcat that is when the reserved are set to invalid bits. Is there any possible solution or am I just out of luck

Re: Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread Mark Thomas
On 04/12/2014 15:26, Jason Ricles wrote: > I have tomcat 7.0.53 and have been having a problem with the following > error when sending a binary message "CloseReason: code [1002], reason > [The client frame set the reserved bits to [x] which was not supported > by this endpoint]" where x is between

Error with finding of reserve bits in websocket frame tomcat 7.0.53?

2014-12-04 Thread Jason Ricles
I have tomcat 7.0.53 and have been having a problem with the following error when sending a binary message "CloseReason: code [1002], reason [The client frame set the reserved bits to [x] which was not supported by this endpoint]" where x is between 1-7 when printed out. So I remote debugged and st

Re: META-INF/context.xml and deploy issue (web.xml removed?)

2014-12-04 Thread Mark Thomas
On 04/12/2014 08:48, m...@ow2.org wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone can help me to find out what I am missing ? There are lots of nasty edge cases in the deployment process. This has been cleaned up in 7.0.x and 8.0.x but not in 6.0.x. See http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/config/automatic-deploy

RE: Tomcat JDBC connection pool: Using initSql together with validatorClassName

2014-12-04 Thread Iris Hupkens
True, using a Validator which checks if validateAction == VALIDATE_INIT and then performs the initSql itself will work. In my situation the validatorClassName was a configurable property, so I ended up creating a simple wrapper Validator which chooses between executing the initSql or calling the

Re: restricting JMX

2014-12-04 Thread Mark Thomas
On 04/12/2014 09:05, Roman Chrenko wrote: > Hi, all. > > Is it possible to restrict JMX for Tomcat 7? Yes. If you want a more specific answer, you'll need to ask a more specific question. > I use Tomcat 7.0.42. Time to upgrade, especially if you are using JMX. > I configured Tomcat as describe

Re: META-INF/context.xml and deploy issue (web.xml removed?)

2014-12-04 Thread Jose María Zaragoza
2014-12-04 9:48 GMT+01:00 m...@ow2.org : > Hi, > > Is anyone can help me to find out what I am missing ? > Thanks Hi: I asked a similar question time ago http://grokbase.com/t/tomcat/users/13chhkj0qx/modify-content-in-meta-inf-context-xml I hope it helps you Regards > > Le 02/12/2014 10:36

Receiving HTTP 505 on Expect: 100-continue

2014-12-04 Thread Osipov, Michael
Hi folks, we are experiencing a popular issue with MS .NET clients sending "Expect: 100-continue" and Tomcat failing with HTTP 505. We use Apache Tomcat 6.0.41 with APR connector on a corporate network. The request look like this in Wireshark: 1. Client sends empty request with one TCP packet 2

restricting JMX

2014-12-04 Thread Roman Chrenko
Hi, all. Is it possible to restrict JMX for Tomcat 7? I use Tomcat 7.0.42. I configured Tomcat as described in http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/monitoring.html. I used JmxRemoteLifecycleListener in server.xml, as described in http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/listeners.html

Re: META-INF/context.xml and deploy issue (web.xml removed?)

2014-12-04 Thread m...@ow2.org
Hi, Is anyone can help me to find out what I am missing ? Thanks Le 02/12/2014 10:36, m...@ow2.org a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm facing an issue with tomcat 6. In order to setup a JDNI, we > added a context.xml file to our application (XWiki) in the > already-deployed folder webapps/xwiki/META-INF/