Hey Neven,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Neven Cvetkovic
wrote:
> Hey Shawn,
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:58 PM, NEW IT wrote:
>
>> André, Chris and Neven,
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the late response. Got stuck on other project and just come
>> back now to read all
>> your awesome helpful advices!
Hey Shawn,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:58 PM, NEW IT wrote:
> André, Chris and Neven,
>
>
> Sorry for the late response. Got stuck on other project and just come
> back now to read all
> your awesome helpful advices!
>
>
You are welcome!
> Neven, I got to try your "pseudocode". They are really d
André, Chris and Neven,
Sorry for the late response. Got stuck on other project and just come
back now to read all
your awesome helpful advices!
Neven, I got to try your "pseudocode". They are really detailed
written and well explained. A little bit extra trouble in my situation
is that I need t
Chris,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
> So just write a batch script that looks like this:
>
> @ECHO OFF
> SET CATALINA_BASE=whatever
> SET CATALINA_HOME=whatever
>
> CALL %CATALINA_HOME%\bin\catalina.sh start
>
You meant of course:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 8/22/14, 11:29 AM, John Smith wrote:
> TC 7.0.54, RHEL 6, JDK 1.7.0_60. I have two RH servers with one
> instance of TC on each, set up for clustering. There's a HWLB
> routing 80 to 8080 with 5 min sticky sessions.
>
> My daily catalina l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Neven,
On 8/22/14, 2:59 AM, Neven Cvetkovic wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:40 PM, David Kerber
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/21/2014 6:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>>>
>>> Now all that's left to do is for someone to make a version of
>>> this that works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David,
On 8/21/14, 9:40 PM, David Kerber wrote:
> On 8/21/2014 6:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Neven Cvetkovic [mailto:neven.cvetko...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: question on different version of tomcat runni
I had an earlier thread where I asked some questions about tomcat
startup times. Essentially, by disabling the annotation checking thing,
I was able to get my startup time from 700 seconds down to around 30
seconds.
Today I was doing some changes, and I moved a jar from the
${catalina.base}/l
How would you use a proxy to do that?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Yogesh Rao wrote:
> How about tracing the http request and response for the call made?
>
> Tip : adding a proxy wud help here to log the entire request.
>
> Regards,
> -Yogesh
>
> On Monday, August 18, 2014, John Smith wrot
TC 7.0.54, RHEL 6, JDK 1.7.0_60. I have two RH servers with one instance of
TC on each, set up for clustering. There's a HWLB routing 80 to 8080 with 5
min sticky sessions.
My daily catalina logs are set up to just show SEVERE errors, every day
they average about *30mb* per server with the same se
Ok, So the requests will be idle upto the long poll timeout if no response
is generated.
So in our test setup we have 60 clients and each makes 5000 requests.
These 5000 requests are made at the same time and renewed(i.e. a new
request is made in a loop ) as soon as
the app server sends response
On 22/08/2014 11:22, anurag gupta wrote:
> Executors:-
>
> maxThreads="2048" minSpareThreads="1024" maxQueueSize="1"
> prestartminSpareThreads="true"/>
>
> This is the connector config :-
>
> protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol" redirectPort="8443"
> acceptCount="10"
Executors:-
This is the connector config :-
> The only way to know for sure is if you use a profiler and find out
where you application is using memory.
Yes we do cache the AsyncResponse objects till the timeout happens or some
response is generated.
> How long does a request take to proce
On 22/08/2014 09:47, anurag gupta wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
>
> The same application is running in a jetty9 server. And I ran a test for 5
> hours with 300,000 requests (moving window of 9mins) with 10g of heap.
> Jetty didn't crash with OOM. So I guess my application is not the source of
> OOM.
I di
On 22/08/2014 03:31, ?? wrote:
> I read an article on the internet that says that Tomcat was
> found to accept content-length headers with chunked encoding over any
> HTTP connector and multiple content-length headers in a request when
> using the AJP connector. This could allow attack
Thanks Mark.
The same application is running in a jetty9 server. And I ran a test for 5
hours with 300,000 requests (moving window of 9mins) with 10g of heap.
Jetty didn't crash with OOM. So I guess my application is not the source of
OOM.
I'm currently using tomcat 7.0.50 in production and it is
On 22/08/2014 06:03, anurag gupta wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to implement long polling using the servlet 3.0 spec.
> Implementation wise it's done and works fine in tomcat. The problem occurs
> when it is under load, for eg. when we send just 100,000 requests we see
> weird behaviour like
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:40 PM, David Kerber wrote:
> On 8/21/2014 6:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>>
>> Now all that's left to do is for someone to make a version of this that
>> works for installing and starting the same as Windows Services.
>>
>> Despite what Christopher wrote - which is basica
18 matches
Mail list logo
