-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 1/24/14, 10:18 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:24:41PM -0500, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:08 PM, André Warnier
>> wrote:
>>> Either people don't read the rules, or they do not understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Filip,
On 1/24/14, 10:02 AM, Filip Hanik wrote:
> Since this is part of a thread, neither top nor bottom posting
> makes sense, why include the previous post if we all have access to
> it in our conversation thread. the only time it makes sense to
>
Hi all,
for my Java Servlet web applications which run on Tomcat (currently 8.0.0-RC
10) on various Windows Server OSes (currently Windows Server 2012 R2), I use
the ISAPI Redirector to forward requests from IIS to Tomcat over AJP. I use IIS
as primary web server because I also host other websi
On 1/23/2014 5:21 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>If you'd care to post your code to either the list or onto the wiki, I'm
>sure it would be useful to someone. Feel free to trim-out huge sections
>of the code and say "make this fit your environment", etc. if you don't
>want to show everyone how ba
On 24/01/2014 18:24, Leo Medina wrote:
> It's been a while since I installed tomcat and having some jdbc errors with
> version 6.0.20.
Time to upgrade.
> We don't have a mysql.jdbc.driver
com.mysql.jdbc.Driver must be present in one of your webapps. I'd expect
it to be in a JAR that has mysql in
Good morning Apache team!
It's been a while since I installed tomcat and having some jdbc errors with
version 6.0.20. We don't have a mysql.jdbc.driver and uncertain why its
trying to register this. However we do have the oracle.jdbc.driver and the
connections and driver location are accurate,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Howard,
>
> On 1/23/14, 11:31 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> > Instead of downloading Linux and trying it out, on my own, I just
> > decided to st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 1/23/14, 11:31 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> Instead of downloading Linux and trying it out, on my own, I just
> decided to stay with Windows. it just works (for me).
I'm honestly glad to hear that you are having a good experience wi
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 5:31 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Cannot connect from outside using Tomcat 7/APR/SSL
> on AWS Windows system
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:07 PM, C
All good ideas.
I like the general rule of: be nice or ignore the post.
Why should we let a user's post turn our day lousy?
I'd hate to see this place turn into what other user forums have
become, not naming names.
-
To unsubs
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:24:41PM -0500, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:08 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> > Either people don't read the rules, or they do not understand the rule, or
> > they just ignore it.
>
> I agree. As a tomcat/tomee user, I joined the list, primarily,
Since this is part of a thread, neither top nor bottom posting makes sense,
why include the previous post if we all have access to it in our
conversation thread.
the only time it makes sense to include it, would be when you reply in line
to multiple questions with multiple answers.
there, that sho
On Friday, January 24, 2014 9:46 AM, "Caldarale, Charles R"
wrote:
> From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of chris derham
> Subject: Re: [OT] Out of memory exception - top posting
> As long as you can visually distinguish the reply from the original,
> does it
If I can't figure out what the post is talking about by looking at the
first 50-60 lines, I usually just hit D and move on. If, by some
miracle, the poster really needed to reach *me*, he may eventually ask
why I don't respond, and then I can tell him privately why I find his
messages unintelligib
> From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of chris derham
> Subject: Re: [OT] Out of memory exception - top posting
> As long as you can visually distinguish the reply from the original,
> does it really matter if that reply is above or below the original?
Always bottom-p
I run fedora and use firefox. I also update my system weekly using yum.
Recently I was testing something (directory linking) on my own local web using
tomcat and one application.
I kept getting a total white screen with a particular test popup (using any of
the 3 linking style and then even nor
2014/1/24 akshay hiremath :
> Through some trials found that its not enough to increase the Executors
> thread count(maxThreads for Executor element) but also need to increase the
> Connectors thread count(maxThreads for Connector element). This behavior is
> not actually clearly captured in tomcat
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/01/2014 06:06, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> ApacheCon NA will be in Denver 7th to 11th April.
> >>
> >> The schedule for ApacheCon NA 2014 has been firmed up. There is an
> >> opp
Through some trials found that its not enough to increase the Executors thread
count(maxThreads for Executor element) but also
need to increase the Connectors thread count(maxThreads for Connector
element). This behavior is not actually clearly captured in tomcat
documentation says
"A referen
> There are probably lots of reasons for top-posting, and I don't think we can
> lay the blame on the MS Outlook world. The people I work with use a mixture
> of Thunderbird, web-based interfaces, and Outlook.
>
> Every one of them top-posts :-(.
When you click reply in these email clients, they i
On 23 January 2014 20:08, André Warnier wrote:
> Ray Holme wrote:
>
>> Doing anything as root conceals the errors. Tomcat is no exception and
>> changing it to a real user makes your testing complete.
>>
>>
> Guys,
> I think that the rule (or should I say suggestion ?) on this list to *not*
> top
2014/1/24 Mark Thomas :
> On 23/01/2014 15:25, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> On 1/23/14, 10:17 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2014 15:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
If that's true, then the Digester should be using the public
namespace id of the schema and ignoring the (incomplete)
>
>
> I've dealt with similar nonsensical "compliance scans" before, and
> my response was:
>
> "You believe you can PUT or DELETE files on this installation?"
>
> ** makes popcorn **
>
> "Please proceed. I'll sit here and watch. Take your time."
>
> Morons. Bane of productive peoples' existence.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/01/2014 15:25, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 1/23/14, 10:17 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 23/01/2014 15:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> If that's true, then the Digester should be using the public
>>> namespace id of the schema and ignoring
24 matches
Mail list logo
