On 28/11/2013 06:36, Ben Stringer wrote:
> On Thu, November 28, 2013 5:15 pm, kanishk.se...@accenture.com wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>
> Hi Kanishhk,
>
>> We are using Apache tomcat version 6.0.26 and we need to install below
>> patches on our servers to fix some Vulnerabilities.
>>
>> http://svn.apach
On Thu, November 28, 2013 5:15 pm, kanishk.se...@accenture.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
Hi Kanishhk,
> We are using Apache tomcat version 6.0.26 and we need to install below
> patches on our servers to fix some Vulnerabilities.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=958911
> http://svn
Hi All,
We are using Apache tomcat version 6.0.26 and we need to install below patches
on our servers to fix some Vulnerabilities.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=958911
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=958977
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revi
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tomcat Random >wrote:
>
> > Everything behaves as expected, except after 600 seconds (10 minutes) all
> > the pooled connections expire. As far as I can tell the default is to not
> > remove/evict pooled connections below 'minIdle' but that's what's
> > happeni
I should add this is with MySQL 5.5.34
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tomcat Random wrote:
> I have two instances of Tomcat 7.0.42, each on their own physical server
> (RHEL6). There's nothing in front of them, I'm using IPTABLES to route 80
> to 8080. They're clustered using the native Tomcat
I have two instances of Tomcat 7.0.42, each on their own physical server
(RHEL6). There's nothing in front of them, I'm using IPTABLES to route 80
to 8080. They're clustered using the native Tomcat clustering. I'm using
the non blocking NIO connector.
Everything behaves as expected, except after 6
Thanks Dave, I'll take a look at it.
Chris, thanks as well. Out of curiosity, do either of you know if/how you'd
consolidate logging for things like say clustering. I have clustering
configured for two physical servers each running an instance of tomcat. I
have logging configured as per the cluste
We chose slf4j with log4j underneath.
1. slf4j has nice optimal syntax:
Log.debug("The logged in user is {} {}",firstName,lastName);
http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance
2. It has bridging apis to route other logging frameworks. If you are
using other libraries which use a different
On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@gopivotal.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:48 PM
>>> To: Tomcat Users List
>>> Subjec
On 27 November 2013 18:24, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dave,
>
> On 11/27/13, 12:39 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> On 27 November 2013 17:10, Christopher Schultz
>>> You mean when you try to reach Tomcat's HTTP port from a machine
>>> hard-wired on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dave,
On 11/27/13, 12:39 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 27 November 2013 17:10, Christopher Schultz
>> You mean when you try to reach Tomcat's HTTP port from a machine
>> hard-wired on the network using the local IP, it works fine?
>
> No, sorry , I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alec,
On 11/27/13, 12:35 PM, Tomcat Random wrote:
> Yes, Yuk indeed.
>
> So just to clarify, you recommend using log4j, and replacing all
> my printStackTrace with log4j specific code. Would that be
> correct?
It's really a matter of personal pref
On 27/11/2013 17:28, Bob DeRemer wrote:
> When testing our WebSocket application under heavy load we eventually get the
> following exception from the JSR-356 ServerEndpoint's RemoteEndpoint.Basic
> when trying to write our binary response message:
>
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: The remote
On 27 November 2013 17:10, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dave,
>
> On 11/27/13, 11:18 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> Scenario. Tomcat install on Linux, wired to router. Windows 7
>> connected to router via wifi.
>>
>> from windows.
>>> ping ip.addres
Yes, Yuk indeed.
So just to clarify, you recommend using log4j, and replacing all my
printStackTrace with log4j specific code. Would that be correct?
Cheers,
Alec
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
When testing our WebSocket application under heavy load we eventually get the
following exception from the JSR-356 ServerEndpoint's RemoteEndpoint.Basic when
trying to write our binary response message:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: The remote endpoint was in state
[BINARY_FULL_WRITING] whic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alec,
On 11/27/13, 11:45 AM, Tomcat Random wrote:
> I'm running Tomcat 7.0.42 on RHEL. Currently all my exceptions are
> handled with e.printStackTrace() and go to catalina.out, which
> doesn't rotate.
Yuk.
> Could someone be so kind as to recom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dave,
On 11/27/13, 11:18 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Scenario. Tomcat install on Linux, wired to router. Windows 7
> connected to router via wifi.
>
> from windows.
>> ping ip.address no problem
Which IP address? The local one or the public one o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 11/27/13, 5:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 27/11/2013 07:34, Dehaudt, Christophe wrote:
>>> Is there a way to share the nonce between servers so they can
>>> act as one?
>>
>> No. You'd need to customise the Digest
On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@gopivotal.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:48 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: Another Non-blocking IO Question
>>
>> I'm seeing anothe
I'm running Tomcat 7.0.42 on RHEL. Currently all my exceptions are handled
with e.printStackTrace() and go to catalina.out, which doesn't rotate.
Could someone be so kind as to recommend a better way to handle logging,
with specific steps. Daily error logs would be a good start, instead of one
gia
basic is from wifi mc
>ping 192.168.1.65
no problem
My local net is that, 192.168.1.*
putting that in the window(Chrome) browser says no.
http://192.168.1.65:8081
Just times out.
regards
On 27 November 2013 16:37, Leo Donahue - OETX
wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Dave Pawson
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 5:18 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Another Non-blocking IO Question
> 2) If I read correctly, when onAllDataRead() is called, you call
> asyncContext.complete()
>-Original Message-
>From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dave.paw...@gmail.com]
>Subject: wifi access to tomcat on wired mc
>
>http access to tomcat from windows. Nothing
Can you elaborate on this? What url did you try?
Thanks!
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/11/2013 10:58, Nir A wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In our current generation web application we used session replication
> with
> > tomcat clustering. (and a load balancer)
> > That way, we recieved an auto failover when a client
Scenario.
Tomcat install on Linux, wired to router.
Windows 7 connected to router via wifi.
from windows.
>ping ip.address no problem
http access to tomcat from windows. Nothing
telnet access to tomcat ip port Nothing
wired access to tomcat from a.n.other no problem
I've got Zone al
Hi Dan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@gopivotal.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:48 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Another Non-blocking IO Question
>
> I'm seeing another issue with the same basic test though. After I tested the
> previo
Is using the JNDI the best option? Any examples of this or other/better
methods?
Thanks
Chris
On Nov 26, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/11/2013 15:26, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
On 26/11/2013 10:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/11/2013 17:39, Daniel Mikusa wr
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/11/2013 07:34, Dehaudt, Christophe wrote:
Is there a way to share the nonce between servers so they can act as one?
No. You'd need to customise the DigestAuthenticator to do that.
I would like to get your advices , how to make a multiple server deployment
running wi
On 27/11/2013 07:34, Dehaudt, Christophe wrote:
> Is there a way to share the nonce between servers so they can act as one?
No. You'd need to customise the DigestAuthenticator to do that.
> I would like to get your advices , how to make a multiple server deployment
> running with Http digest.
U
31 matches
Mail list logo
