Hi Mark,
Thanks for the reply.
As I could understand from this bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53061 , and referring to
your comment "Looking at the NIO source code, there is a test that
essentially means that timeouts only get processed after one second of
inactivity so un
I am curious to know how Tomcat's connectors handle the request processing
internally, especially between the Http11Protocol which i believe acts as a
connector and with every connector there may be a request processor which
is the Http11Processor.
I think there is a pool of Http11Processor classe
> You need to destroy the connector to close the port.
Mark,
That seems to work. :)
Now the port is free. But is it the right approach? Is this something we need
to do in Tomcat 7 specifically?
Thanks.
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Tue
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat
> 7.0.30
> > How long are you waiting? Can you give us the specifics of your
> > connector configuration? I wonder if the connector is remaining open
> > for something like a keepalive timeout
On 13/05/2013 16:34, Chirag Dewan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am embedding Apache Tomcat 7.0.30 in my application. I am using the Tomcat
> class,and my application requires dynamic addition and removal of
> connectors(HTTP).
>
> Now while removing the connectors,the application gets undeployed but the
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat
> 7.0.30
> > If I am calling the removeConnector, shouldn't it cleanup the
> > context and the free the port?
> In theory, yes, but ...
> How long are yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/13/13 1:03 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
>> If the context was removed, but the Connector was still there,
>> should you not get a 404 Not Found, rather than a timeout ?
>
>
> If I am calling the removeConnector, shouldn't it cleanup the
>
On 13/05/2013 18:01, Rahul Kumar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need some help with the async context timeout in servlet 3.0 running
> on tomcat 7.0.40.
>
> I have set the asynccontext timeout value, but the timeout behaviour is
> highly inconsistent. Sometimes the timeouts work, but most of the times
>
> From: Stefan Mayr [mailto:ste...@mayr-stefan.de]
> Subject: Delayed WAR expansion, timeout on context startup?
> Are there any parameters to adjust deployment timeouts for these
> contexts with large WAR files?
Want to give us a hint about what Tomcat version, JVM level, and platform
you're
Hi,
we've upgraded our linux systems and experience some serious slowdowns
from our antivirus solutions. Expanding large WAR files (e.g. Alfresco)
is blocked by the virus scanner for minutes (!). Now we get tomcats
failing to deploy contexts on startup. Everything was fine when the
deployment
> If the context was removed, but the Connector was still there, should you not
> get a 404
Not Found, rather than a timeout ?
If I am calling the removeConnector,shouldn't it cleanup the context and the
free the port?
I mean is my context blocking the connector even after I removed it? i shou
Yeah, it's clear from what's typed below his DB driver is way out of whack with
this ancient version of Tomcat.
It probably got updated along the way by network sorts while the Tomcat version
stayed put.
Go to current, and with current Tomcat, also get a current JDK - I imagine the
one you hav
Hi All,
I need some help with the async context timeout in servlet 3.0 running on
tomcat 7.0.40.
I have set the asynccontext timeout value, but the timeout behaviour is
highly inconsistent. Sometimes the timeouts work, but most of the times
they don't. I am attaching the source code and the outpu
Chirag Dewan wrote:
How do you observe that the connector is still bound to the port?
Yes. I used netstat to observe that. Plus when I try to add another context to the same
port,I get "Address already in use" exception.
What does it show?
I can see my java process running on that port.
>How do you observe that the connector is still bound to the port?
Yes. I used netstat to observe that. Plus when I try to add another context to
the same port,I get "Address already in use" exception.
> What does it show?
I can see my java process running on that port.
>What happens if you m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/13/13 11:34 AM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
> I am embedding Apache Tomcat 7.0.30 in my application. I am using
> the Tomcat class,and my application requires dynamic addition and
> removal of connectors(HTTP).
>
> Now while removing the conn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeny,
On 5/13/13 2:52 AM, Jeny V wrote:
> I'm having some real issues , running programs in Tomcat on my
> machine.
>
> I just copied a jakarta folder named "jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1a" on to
> my D: drive (Path : D:\Program Files\jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1a
Hi,
I am embedding Apache Tomcat 7.0.30 in my application. I am using the Tomcat
class,and my application requires dynamic addition and removal of
connectors(HTTP).
Now while removing the connectors,the application gets undeployed but the port
remains occupied and the connector continue to li
Jeny V wrote:
Hi ,
I'm having some real issues , running programs in Tomcat on my machine.
I just copied a jakarta folder named "jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1a" on to my D: drive
(Path : D:\Program Files\jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1a) .
Do you not read the answers you have already been given ?
The current v
19 matches
Mail list logo
