Could not find anything achived on this topic
Search query: http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&w=2&r=1&s=tomcat+ocsp&q=t
Further pointers please?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:23 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Amit A wrote:
>
>> I need to enable OCSP on my application which is running Tomcat 7.0.29.
>> L
I am not sure this might suit you, but if i am currently thinking of
http://redis.io/
Key and value storage (binary value is supported), expiry is supported,
support scaling horizontally, can be set to be non-persistent (only in
memory, which is fast)
For more complex data structures, and more abi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 3/20/13 2:25 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
>> All our assets are served from L3 CDN. So the asset requests
>> never come to the application server.
>
> That, I do not understand. I do not understand what you mean by
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I have an in-process "service" that stores valid nonces on a server
for a particular set of client operations. The nonces are created
once, then expire after a certain amount of time. They never change.
I'd like to make this in-process service
I was curious as to people's actual experience with setting a Connector's
acceptorThreadCount while using the BIO http connection (the default)
Frankly, I was unaware that java.net.ServerSockets were multi-thread safe
(although interestingly the javadoc explicitly states that
ServerSocketChannels
>
> 1. How to you send your error and how do you test it?
>
I'm testing the error with simple HTTP clients that send requests using
HTTP methods that the container and my app don't support by default (e.g.
COPY, PROPFIND). While debugging my app, it's clear that the HTTP method
and request are bei
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Comments inline and also I pasted your configuration in from a previous
> email.
>
>
> On 3/20/2013 11:39 AM, my business mail wrote:
>
>> I only added the keystore property not truststore. I was just following
>> what i'd done for tomcat4.1 o
2013/3/20 Shelley :
> I've configured an error-page in my web.xml to handle 501 error-codes, but
> the resource specified in the location entry is not being returned by the
> container as expected.
>
> Here is the content of my web deployment descriptor. Note that the 404
> error-page works as expe
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey D. Fisher [mailto:jeff.fisher12...@cox.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:34 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'; mgai...@hotmail.com
> Subject: RE: SSL Best Practices
>
> Yes, I do have a CA-issued certificate with a chain to a trusted CA.
> I've imported
Comments inline and also I pasted your configuration in from a previous
email.
On 3/20/2013 11:39 AM, my business mail wrote:
I only added the keystore property not truststore. I was just following
what i'd done for tomcat4.1 on w2k3.
In general, don't do this. Tomcat 4.1 (rest its weary code
2013/3/20 Harris, Jeffrey E. :
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: my business mail [mailto:mv.ma...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:39 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.20/Windows 2008 R2/SSL Configuration
>>
>> I only added the keystore property not trust
> -Original Message-
> From: my business mail [mailto:mv.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:39 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.20/Windows 2008 R2/SSL Configuration
>
> I only added the keystore property not truststore. I was just following
> what i'd
I only added the keystore property not truststore. I was just following
what i'd done for tomcat4.1 on w2k3. Here is the log file. The keystore
file is DEF in the path indicated, but i see the error below in the
catalina file.
Mar 20, 2013 2:35:21 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.SetAllPropertiesRu
Hi my business mail.
Don't top-post.
my business mail wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:09 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/20/2013 2:02 PM, my business mail wrote:
OK, here is the text copied from notepad.
8442? Shouldn't it be 8443?
maxThreads="150" scheme
> -Original Message-
> From: my business mail [mailto:mv.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:18 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.20/Windows 2008 R2/SSL Configuration
>
> So, I know the port numbers can be set to any unused port. I was
> toggling betwe
Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Behavior on Multiple HTTP requests from same browser
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
H
So, I know the port numbers can be set to any unused port. I was toggling
between 8442 and 8443. Neither worked. I just set it back to 8443.
I feel like it's connecting somehow, because if I put in a port number that
isn't configured...I get a connection error message.
Otherwise, the browser icon
On 3/20/2013 2:02 PM, my business mail wrote:
OK, here is the text copied from notepad.
8442? Shouldn't it be 8443?
maxThreads="150" scheme="https" secure="true"
clientAuth="false" sslProtocol="TLS"
keystoreFile="D:/DevCert/dev.keystore" keysto
OK, here is the text copied from notepad.
On 3/20/2013 1:41 PM, my business mail wrote:
HI,
I un-commented the SSL section in the server.xml file and added the path
and password to the keystore. But when accessing the
https://localhost:8443/ URL, it just keeps spinning. no error , it just
doesn't seem to connect. This is my first time
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Behavior on Multiple HTTP requests from same browser
Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Saura
On 20/03/2013 16:14, Stadelmann Josef wrote:
> Thank you Jeffrey
>
> BUT
> we are not FW owner, AND
> we are so tiny little smalls in the AXA world AND
> our holly FW godfather admin is keeping his fingers on the holly FW.
>
> But why can tomcat not close and open the port 8080 and keep
> it in
> -Original Message-
> From: Stadelmann Josef [mailto:josef.stadelm...@axa-winterthur.ch]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:15 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: AW: [tomcat] preventing to use it at startup
>
> Thank you Jeffrey
>
> BUT
> we are not FW owner, AND
> we are so tiny li
Thank you Jeffrey
BUT
we are not FW owner, AND
we are so tiny little smalls in the AXA world AND
our holly FW godfather admin is keeping his fingers on the holly FW.
But why can tomcat not close and open the port 8080 and keep
it in a way inexistent for external access unless the server is real
Bug reported at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54732
Due to another bug in TomEE, StatementCache is always enabled. That bug
is reported here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-837
Thanks for your help
On 20/03/2013 7:28 AM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Am 19.03.2013
Bug reported at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54732
Due to another bug in TomEE, StatementCache is always enabled. That bug
is reported here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-837
Thanks for your help
On 20/03/2013 7:28 AM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Am 19.03.2013
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saurabh,
On 3/19/13 9:46 PM, Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
maxThreads="${tomcat.maxthreads}"
minSpareThreads="${tomcat.minsparethreads}"
maxIdleTime="${tomcat.maxidletime}"/>
port="${tomcat.ajp.port}" maxHttpHeaderSize="819
> From: Saurabh Agrawal [mailto:sagra...@sapient.com]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat Behavior on Multiple HTTP requests from same browser
> We have not set the "keep alive" explicitly in tomcat's server.xml.
It's on by default.
> s defined; are the requests coming in
over both or just one of them? Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saurabh,
On 3/19/13 9:46 PM, Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
> maxThreads="${tomcat.maxthreads}"
> minSpareThreads="${tomcat.minsparethreads}"
> maxIdleTime="${tomcat.maxidletime}"/> port="${tomcat.ajp.port}" maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" maxThreads="200"
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 3/20/13 6:52 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> If I may add something : at some point, on each Tomcat server,
> there is only 1 "listening socket" for one port (the point being :
> you could have several, but you won't have 8000). So even if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saurabh,
On 3/20/13 3:27 AM, Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
> The point I was trying to make when I mentioned that all requests
> from the same browser results in same thread is not a mere
> coincidence. The reason why it may not be sheer luck is because
There will be a load of 20,000 users for a special festival for around 4-5
hours ONLY.
Regards,
Saurabh Agrawal
Manager Technology | Sapient
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:48 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 3/19/13 10:31 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
> I'm glad to see that you have a working cluster of some sorts and
> that you are performing load tests to evaluate its performance.
> This means you are on the right track, making some good decision
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saurabh,
On 3/19/13 8:55 PM, Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
> What I want to understand is if the Tomcat will keep Thread 1 as
> persistent thread to server the second request (for login) from
> the same browser or will it assign a separate thread from the
> -Original Message-
> From: Stadelmann Josef [mailto:josef.stadelm...@axa-winterthur.ch]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:06 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: [tomcat] preventing to use it at startup
>
> Hi
>
> Is there an easy way to manage, to prevent, that my AS Tomcat is
Pid wrote:
On 19/03/2013 19:24, Patrick Flaherty wrote:
Hi,
We deploy tomcat in our own folder (c:\rsi_tc\tomcat) on a WIndows
machine as a service. We use the service.bat to install
as a service. Historically to update tomcat we would remove the current
version and install the new version. The
On 19/03/2013 19:24, Patrick Flaherty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We deploy tomcat in our own folder (c:\rsi_tc\tomcat) on a WIndows
> machine as a service. We use the service.bat to install
> as a service. Historically to update tomcat we would remove the current
> version and install the new version. There
Am 19.03.2013 22:20, schrieb Bertrand Guay-Paquet:
On 19/03/2013 5:05 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Have you looked at
http://grokbase.com/t/openejb/users/13135d2a0v/jdbc-connection-pool-memory-leak
? It seems like your problem. Regards Felix
Indeed, this is extremely similar to my issue. Thank
Amit A wrote:
I need to enable OCSP on my application which is running Tomcat 7.0.29.
Looked up the documentation but did not find quite much :
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/ssl-howto.html
1. Is OCSP with just tomcat actually possible? Do we need a external
module/software?
2. Has anyo
Mark Thomas wrote:
Nick Williams wrote:
On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
Hi Nick,
We currently have 8 tomcat nodes with each node configured to have
1000 maxThreads. We did a round of performance test for 8000 concurrent
users and the observation was that the number of a
Harris Mark R wrote:
Sorry, guess I was not clear enough. We are using Microsoft's IIS to front-end
Tomcat, not the Apache HTTP server. Apache HTTP server is not an option for
our environment. We would prefer to use the Windows authenticated user passed
to Tomcat by IIS, but are open to any
Jeffrey,
On 19.3.2013 15:33, Jeffrey D. Fisher wrote:
Yes, I do have a CA-issued certificate with a chain to a trusted CA. I've
imported it to the keystore. I am close to a solution. When I attempt to
open the default Apache web page using "https:" I get an error page that
says that the serve
Nick Williams wrote:
>On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Saurabh Agrawal wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> We currently have 8 tomcat nodes with each node configured to have
>1000 maxThreads. We did a round of performance test for 8000 concurrent
>users and the observation was that the number of active execu
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your valuable feedback.
The point I was trying to make when I mentioned that all requests from the same
browser results in same thread is not a mere coincidence. The reason why it may
not be sheer luck is because we have seen this on production which is accessed
by more than
44 matches
Mail list logo
