Thank Chris for your response,
But I cannot provide you the stacktrace because I have try another solution but
nothing ...
I have try to exclude children page compilation because is it already embedded
in mother page compilation.
I have try following exclusion solution, but neither doesn't wor
Hi Chris,
Tried with this simple server.xml and maxThreads=0 but I did not see any kind
of errors.Attached the catalina logs
> From: yogesh hingmire [mailto:yogesh.hingm...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Capacity Planning Turk's Formula
> How do you think capacity planning should be approached ?
The _only_ way is to actually benchmark your application(s). Tomcat itself
adds very little overhead, so it really depends on t
On 17/01/2013 18:08, yogesh hingmire wrote:
> Folks,
>
>> I was reading this article by Mladen Turk from the FAQ section on TomCat
>> Performance & Capacity Planning
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html
>>
>> It says,
>>
>> “To get most out of Tomcat you should limit the n
Chuck and others,
How do you think capacity planning should be approached ?
Say for eg : I have x number of concurrent users to service with an avg
response time of y etc..
Please help.
Thank You,
Yogesh
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:08 PM, yogesh hingmire wrote:
> Folks,
>
>> I was reading th
Thanks. I'm moving forward to 7.0.35 with the patch, whereas without
the patch 7.0.35 would have been a non-starter (not because it's that
bad but rather because 7.0.34 was good enough that this issue, if
unresolved, more than cancels out 7.0.35's fixes from my perspective).
On 1/17/2013 12:3
Comments in-line since people insist on top-posting.
Some at the end as well . . . .
On 1/17/2013 10:48 AM, Shanti Suresh wrote:
Hi Chuck, Dan,
Sometimes, sharing classes across applications may become necessary
though. We have a situation where a separate application and
associated webapp cl
On 17/01/2013 18:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 1/17/13 12:30 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Looks like the website hasn't yet updated: latest release shows
>> 7.0.34 and reference documentation says 7.0.34 (at least for what I
>> assume is the US mirror).
That is most likely a
I could not have said better than Shanti. It is exactly the type of
situation in.
My question still remains which line
common.loader
or
share.loader
-Narahari
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Shanti Suresh wrote:
> Hi Chuck, Dan,
>
> Sometimes, sharing classes across applications may becom
The question that I am trying to understand is should I use the
common.loader
or
shared.loader
line to put my third party jars.
What is the recommended approach by Tomcat developers ?
-Narahari
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Caldarale,
Hi Chuck, Dan,
Sometimes, sharing classes across applications may become necessary
though. We have a situation where a separate application and associated
webapp classloader is launched for each site in our application. The
reason this is happening is because things have been setup differently
i
2013/1/17 Jess Holle
> As part of testing Tomcat 7.0.35 when I moved to it, I run an Ant script
> to pre-compile all our JSP pages.
>
> When doing so I get a huge number of new failures which boil down to the
> following stack trace. Any ideas here? I can dig in to try to see what's
> causing t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 1/17/13 12:30 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Looks like the website hasn't yet updated: latest release shows
> 7.0.34 and reference documentation says 7.0.34 (at least for what I
> assume is the US mirror).
Looks good, now, except that t
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Subdomains in tomcat 7
> > > autoDeploy="true">
> >
> Only one problem: You shouldn't be using server.xml to define
> s. Instead, put your WAR file into ptt/ROOT.war and let it
> auto-deploy. This will simplify
Folks,
> I was reading this article by Mladen Turk from the FAQ section on TomCat
> Performance & Capacity Planning
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/docs/article/ftwai.html
>
> It says,
>
> “To get most out of Tomcat you should limit the number of concurrent
> requests to 200 per CPU."
>
> So w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Adrien,
On 1/17/13 9:38 AM, Adrien RUFFIE wrote:
> Hello all I have following pages : displayPerson.jsp and
> displaySocialNetwork.jsp
>
> my first displayPerson.jsp include the second by following tag:
> <%@include file="./displaySocialNetwork.js
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leonardo,
On 1/16/13 7:22 PM, Leonardo Torres wrote:
> I have one domain = www.portal.com I have one subdomain =
> www.painel.portal.com
>
> Both domains are configured (DNS) I wish that when the user to
> enter www.portal.com, the appA was loaded.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alan,
On 1/16/13 11:43 PM, Alan Findly wrote:
> The recommended context "ELEMENT" caused the following warning:
>
> Jan 16, 2013 9:10:37 AM org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester
> endElement WARNING: No rules found matching 'Context/Context'.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David,
On 1/17/13 1:49 AM, David Kumar wrote:
> I just checked /var/logs/apache2/error.logs. And found following
> errors:
>
> [Wed Jan 16 15:14:46 2013] [error] server is within MinSpareThreads
> of MaxClients, consider raising the MaxClients sett
Hi,
This is the server.xml. Sorry for not replying promptly but I am "multitasking"
in a lot of things :(
From: Christopher Schultz
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Thursday, Janu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 1/16/13 3:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
> Apache Tomcat 7.0.35.
Looks like the website hasn't yet updated: latest release shows 7.0.34
and reference documentation says 7.0.34 (at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 1/17/13 3:32 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Quite a few messages ago, I asked the OP if he could copy/paste
> his server.xml.
Yes. Getting information from the OP seems to be difficult.
> The reason was that if his config uses an Executor, t
As part of testing Tomcat 7.0.35 when I moved to it, I run an Ant script
to pre-compile all our JSP pages.
When doing so I get a huge number of new failures which boil down to the
following stack trace. Any ideas here? I can dig in to try to see
what's causing this, but this is new behavior.
On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Narahari 'n' Savitha [mailto:savith...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: common vs system vs shared class loaders
>
>> Sorry Dan but if I do what you are suggesting I will end up in redundant
>> jars all over the place and I dont want t
> From: Narahari 'n' Savitha [mailto:savith...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: common vs system vs shared class loaders
> Sorry Dan but if I do what you are suggesting I will end up in redundant
> jars all over the place and I dont want to do that.
That's an issue easily handled by a deployment script
Sorry Dan but if I do what you are suggesting I will end up in redundant
jars all over the place and I dont want to do that.
Any other thoughts ?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Narahari 'n' Savitha wrote:
>
> > Friends:
> >
> > Thank you for
On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Narahari 'n' Savitha wrote:
> Friends:
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> Here is the entry for the catalina.policy file
>
>
>
> common.loader=${catalina.base}/lib,${catalina.base}/lib/*.jar,${catalina.home}/lib,${catalina.home}/lib/*.jar
>
> server.loader=
>
> sh
Hello all I have following pages :
displayPerson.jsp and displaySocialNetwork.jsp
my first displayPerson.jsp include the second by following tag:
<%@include file="./displaySocialNetwork.jsp"%>
In the first page (displayPerson.jsp) following variable is declared:
<%
String id = person.getId();
%>
On 17/01/2013 14:02, e e wrote:
> Can anyone please provide me this information please. Sorry for being
> persistent!!
>
> I am still not clear why a URLStreamHandlerFactory is required for JNDI!!!
It isn't.
> I thought Context.lookup() is what the web-apps will do!
They do.
> Why would th
Can anyone please provide me this information please. Sorry for being
persistent!!
I am still not clear why a URLStreamHandlerFactory is required for JNDI!!!
I thought Context.lookup() is what the web-apps will do! Why would the
web-apps want to use a new URL("jndi://"); Where/why does tom
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:11 PM
>
> On 17/01/2013 11:07, Steve Mactaggart wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have been hunting a BufferOverflowException on our production system
for
> > the last while, and initial
On 17/01/2013 11:07, Steve Mactaggart wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been hunting a BufferOverflowException on our production system for
> the last while, and initially thought this was resolved by issue 53119, we
> have subsequently upgraded to 7.0.32 and have still seen the issues.
>
> Reading thr
Hi All,
I have been hunting a BufferOverflowException on our production system for
the last while, and initially thought this was resolved by issue 53119, we
have subsequently upgraded to 7.0.32 and have still seen the issues.
Reading through the mailing list archive it seems I am not the only on
On 16 January 2013 22:52, Kevin Priebe wrote:
> Thanks for the info. We made some changes to the linux TCP settings last
> night and haven't noticed the issue yet today, so are hoping that does the
> trick. We won't know for sure until there are several days without issues.
> If it continues, w
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hermes,
On 1/16/13 3:07 PM, Hermes Flying wrote:
I believe acceptCount can not work with value 0 because if I am
not wrong, the acceptCount is the value passed as backlog in the
ServerSocket constructor. According to j
35 matches
Mail list logo
