Vincent
RST always terminates a TCP connection. The question is really why was it
*sent.* The usual reason is writing to a connection that has already been
closed by the peer. Is there an incoming close_notify higher up in the SSL
log? I suppose not otherwise an SSLException would have been throw
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Recognizing certificate removal (SmartCard)
Too late (at least in the US); you just made it public...
Shuks. Ok then, I'll have to be satisfied with the glory.
The US patent law has changed (but may
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Recognizing certificate removal (SmartCard)
> > Too late (at least in the US); you just made it public...
> Shuks. Ok then, I'll have to be satisfied with the glory.
The US patent law has changed (but may not go into effect unti
David kerber wrote:
On 12/5/2012 4:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
David kerber wrote:
On 12/5/2012 1:35 PM, André Warnier wrote:
...
(*) Come to think of it, it would be rather universal as a solution.
and
not so complex to set up. I may have to patent this idea...
Too late (at least in the
On 12/5/2012 4:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
David kerber wrote:
On 12/5/2012 1:35 PM, André Warnier wrote:
...
(*) Come to think of it, it would be rather universal as a solution. and
not so complex to set up. I may have to patent this idea...
Too late (at least in the US); you just made it
David kerber wrote:
On 12/5/2012 1:35 PM, André Warnier wrote:
...
(*) Come to think of it, it would be rather universal as a solution. and
not so complex to set up. I may have to patent this idea...
Too late (at least in the US); you just made it public...
Shuks. Ok then, I'll have to be
On 12/5/2012 1:35 PM, André Warnier wrote:
...
(*) Come to think of it, it would be rather universal as a solution. and
not so complex to set up. I may have to patent this idea...
Too late (at least in the US); you just made it public...
-
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
...
Oddly enough, yes, it is a valid use case. we have specific scenarios
where there are common use PCs that have a generic ID logged in,
As far as I remember the classics, that in itself is already a flaw with regard to
security, no ?
> but
> they use their CAC
What is the memory use when it dies?
How much cpu is being used by tomcat?
You probably have a fault in the application.
On 6/12/12 2:05 AM, "vicky" wrote:
>
>
>Is there anything in the error log? Access log? ===> No errors/exception
>in logs
>What applications are you running on it? > basi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 12/5/12 12:17 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/12/3 Caldarale, Charles R :
>>> From: Weixiang [mailto:kurt.weixi...@huawei.com] Subject:
>>> Tomcat7.0-Setting property 'threadPriority' did not find a
>>> matching property
>>
>>> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vicky,
On 12/5/12 10:35 AM, vicky wrote:
> Is there anything in the error log? Access log? ===> No
> errors/exception in logs What applications are you running on it?
> > basic customer data entry application deployed on tomcart
> What version is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will,
On 12/5/12 7:33 AM, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote: Will,
>
> On 12/4/12 2:47 PM, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
Thanks for the quick response and the thoughts. a 5 minute
timeout wouldn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 12/5/12 3:12 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Other than that, and without any pretense at offering a "solution"
> to the present issue, maybe this is the point where one needs to
> step back and ask oneself if this is really a problem of the
> ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 12/5/12 2:49 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Esmond Pitt wrote:
>> Broken pipes don't invalidate the SSL session. They just break
>> the TCP connection. The SSL session persists, across multiple TCP
>> connections, until it is specifically invali
Is there anything in the error log? Access log? ===> No errors/exception in logs
What applications are you running on it? > basic customer data entry
application deployed on tomcart
What version is it? ==> Apache 2.2
What OS are you on? ==> Linux Redhat 5
___
Is there anything in the error log? Access log?
What applications are you running on it?
What version is it?
What OS are you on?
On 6/12/12 12:25 AM, "vicky007aggar...@yahoo.co.in"
wrote:
>Hello Guys,
>
>My apache instance after sometime become unresponsive & to restore it i
>need to restart it.
Hello Vicky,
What are your configs and h/w specs ?Make sure you have enough memory?
Regards,
Mohammad Tariq
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:25 PM, wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> My apache instance after sometime become unresponsive & to restore it i
> need to restart it. Weird thing is that no e
Hello Guys,
My apache instance after sometime become unresponsive & to restore it i need to
restart it. Weird thing is that no exception/error is coming in logs.
Can you please suggest what all things i can check for my apache.
Is there any jvm related things which i need to check.
Please sug
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Will,
>
> On 12/4/12 2:47 PM, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick response and the thoughts. a 5 minute
>> timeout wouldn't be acceptable in our environment - theory being,
>
Hi Konstantin,
1. This NullPointerException happens when an application starts up?
(Do the apps perform the lookup once and cache the result, or they
perform multiple lookups?)
No, it happens after application starts up. The applications perform
multiple lookups.
2. What is seen in JNDI context
Yes but he *already has* an SSL session which he states is being
invalidated. To the limited extent to which I could make sense of your
incomprehensible post, it appears to be 100% irrelevant.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 December
On 4 December 2012 21:18, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/12/5 Lyallex :
> > On 4 December 2012 19:41, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
> >
> >> 2012/12/4 Lyallex :
> >> > On 4 December 2012 18:50, Konstantin Kolinko
> >> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Moreover, I think it should run just fine with an older
On 05/12/2012 01:05, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Also, if there is some other email group I should be using for technical
> questions about use of Tomcat please let me know.
No, this is it.
p
--
[key:62590808]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will,
On 12/4/12 2:47 PM, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
Thanks for the quick response and the thoughts. a 5 minute
timeout wouldn't be acceptable in our environment - theory being,
if user A pulls his smart card out (but didn't
24 matches
Mail list logo
