2012/2/17 Jeffrey Janner :
> Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current deployment, and 7.x for future
> deployments.
>
> I host an app for a couple of dozen customers. Naturally, upgrade time can
> be a bit of a pain, and I'd like to simplify things.
> Assuming that all the customer-specific informat
On 1:59 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey,
On 2/17/12 10:45 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Thanks. I was under the impression that Tomcat normally explodes
the war files when you drop them into the webapps folder, though I
know you can disable th
On 1:59 PM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
Hi All,
I was reading an old article
(http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-01-2008/jw-01-tomcat6.html?page=1)
about Tomcat to find out whether Tomcat can be used as application
serve or not. This article list that Tomcat 6.x support following
features:
On 17 Feb 2012, at 22:02, Shanti Suresh wrote:
> The threaddump look the same across both servers. The heapdump shows
> increasing heap on the suspect server in the Finalizer class. The Finalizer
> class is holding references to another class which is a wrapper class for
> ConectionPool obje
On 18/02/2012 21:57, Pae Choi wrote:
> Tomcat v7.0.25
> CentOS 5.7 32bit
>
> Running the tomcat without any webapp deployed, the system shows about
> 38 processes(i think)
> related to logging. Why that many and what are they logging about?
>
> I see some of logging under the "$CATALINA_HOME/logs
Tomcat v7.0.25
CentOS 5.7 32bit
Running the tomcat without any webapp deployed, the system shows about
38 processes(i think)
related to logging. Why that many and what are they logging about?
I see some of logging under the "$CATALINA_HOME/logs" folder and they
seemed to be reasonably
needed
Tomcat v7.0.25
CentOS 5.7 32bit
Running the tomcat without any webapp deployed, the system shows about
38 processes
related to logging. Why that many and what are they logging about?
I see some of logging under the "$CATALINA_HOME/logs" folder and they
seemed to be
reasonably needed. But wha
On 18/02/2012 14:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
> "Robinson, Eric" wrote:
>
>> Agreed. Anyway, in this case the thread is on a tomcat server that
>> is only used for scheduled java tasks. Users do not access it
>> directly. Very puzzling. What's I'd really like is for some
>> well-known tomcat guru to sa
"Robinson, Eric" wrote:
>Agreed. Anyway, in this case the thread is on a tomcat server that is
>only used for scheduled java tasks. Users do not access it directly.
>Very puzzling. What's I'd really like is for some well-known tomcat
>guru
>to say that in our environment, -Xms16M is fine and that
> Robinson, Eric wrote:
> >> We have many servers that have been running 100-200 instances of
> >> tomcat each for years without any performance problems.
> >> Most of our servers are Linux 8-core machines with 32GB
> RAM, with the
> >> tomcat instances configured with -Xms16M -Xmx192M.
> >> We
Robinson, Eric wrote:
We have many servers that have been running 100-200 instances
of tomcat each for years without any performance problems.
Most of our servers are Linux 8-core machines with 32GB RAM,
with the tomcat instances configured with -Xms16M -Xmx192M.
We also have some Windows serv
11 matches
Mail list logo
