hi Christopher,
my tomcat version is : 7.0.14
working on Window7 with JDK 1.6
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Debraj,
>
> On 11/30/11 1:16 PM, Debraj Mallick wrote:
> > i have set max
Hi,
I'm new here, and hope that someone can help.
I was wondering if any of the LDAP-type realms (e.g., JNDIRealm, etc.) support
an authentication mode where no password or credentials are required? In other
words, where just a userID/username is presented, and if that userID/username
is pres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Debraj,
On 11/30/11 1:16 PM, Debraj Mallick wrote:
> i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting
> exception *Stack trace:* 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An
> exception or error oc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thom,
On 11/30/11 1:04 PM, Thom Hehl wrote:
> I'm using VI to reading the log file. I running a Windows RDP.
Are you using 'vi' in a way that allows it to get updates from the
file? I'm no 'vi' expert, but I'm sure it reads the entire file at
startup
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 22:38, André Warnier wrote:
[...]
>
> I am not knowledgeable at all in such questions, and while you are at it let
> me ask a question :
> Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily (or
> usually) imply that data transfers between CPU and RAM ha
>>Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily
(or usually) imply
>>that data transfers between CPU and RAM happen also 64-bit in parallel ?
That depends on front bus width. Modern PCs has 64-bit bus AFAIK.
In "64-bit CPU" 64 is register size and nothing else (although
Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:51, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
[...]
Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at
all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for
the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more.
This is qui
Am 30.11.2011 12:08, schrieb j...@gniffelnieuws.net:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:14:45 +0530, Choudhury wrote
Hello ,
The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the
question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat
and if yes why ? Regards,
The limit is the JVM, not
Hi,
IT is Mac OSX 10.6.8
java -version
java version "1.6.0_20"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode)
tomcat is 7.0.21
database is Sybase ASE 15.0.3
We are getting this error in about every half hour
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:51, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
[...]
>
> Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at
> all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for
> the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more.
>
This is quite the opposite: a
Hi list,
I'm a bit puzzled.
I want to forward all incoming HTTP-traffic to HTTPS.
Within my $catalina.home/conf/server.xml I've specified the following
connectors:
Then I specified in $catalina.home/conf/web.xml the following
transport-guarantee:
Just disable HTTP connector (comment it in server.xml).
You can use firewall to protect AJP port from remote clients too.
Ilya Kazakevich,
Developer
JetBrains Inc
http://www.jetbrains.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
-Original Message-
From: cpanon [mailto:cpa...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
>> That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more
>> than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know
>> that right?
>That's per process. All reasonably recent 32-bit OSs can address way
>more than 4GiB internally.
Yes, but one region in memory is reserved for IO. Drivers u
Hi Martin,
i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting exception
*Stack trace:*
30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service
SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request
processing
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException:
Hello
I have an Apache-ajp-Tomcat config that works, but I would like to block any
access to tomcat directly, either on localhost (except for 8009) or from a
client? What/is there a tomcat config to achieve that?
I'm using VI to reading the log file. I running a Windows RDP.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thom,
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thom,
On 11/30/11 10:01 AM, Thom Hehl wrote:
> When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be
> writing the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some
> way I can make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
What tool ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Casper,
On 11/30/11 3:37 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
> Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when
> running 32bit? That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more
> than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin shou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
On 11/30/11 12:11 PM, Martin Kuen wrote:
> Try setting"maxHttpHeaderSize" for the in your
> server.xml. Its default value is 8192 bytes. I guess you're
> exceeding this limit.
+1
If you have a lot of cookies or if you are sending SSL cert
I am using the out of the box configuration for logging. I did a search of my
logging.properties and didn't find buffersize. Here 'tis.
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
# this work for addi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subhrajyoti,
On 11/30/11 1:28 AM, choudh...@labware.com wrote:
> Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat
> on 32 bit Windows machines?
See this week's thread called "Server crash for memory limit" for some
information about
On 30 Nov 2011, at 10:45, "choudh...@labware.com" wrote:
> Hello ,
>The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is
> whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why
No. Tomcat has no knowledge of the memory capacity of the JVM.
p
> ?
> Regards
Hi Mallick,
Try setting"maxHttpHeaderSize" for the in your
server.xml. Its default value is 8192 bytes. I guess you're exceeding this
limit.
i.e.
More details/exact info:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Standard_Implementation
Best Regards,
Martin
Thankyou Dan for your quick response my *server.xml*:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 08:31 -0800, Debraj Mallick wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am getting exception while adding cookies in response
>
> *Stack trace*:
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service
> SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request
> processing
> java.
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 07:01 -0800, Thom Hehl wrote:
> When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing
> the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can
> make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
>
Just a guess, but it sounds like it could be buffe
hi all,
i am getting exception while adding cookies in response
*Stack trace*:
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service
SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request
processing
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Abstr
When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing
the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can
make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
>
> So the effect is that multiple physical directories must be searched for
> a given resource?
Correct.
The alias maps a given path to an external directory.
Ok, that's what i had understood.
Can you give an example of how you would like it to work?
Here is the description of the EDR (Ex
Thanks Igor. I made a mistake though. I actually meant "modifying web.xml
and restarting the webapp."
We want to find a way to change session timeouts - even for existing
sessions - without doing a restart of the webapp.
I know there's also a server-level session timeout in tomcat's
/conf/web.x
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:14:45 +0530, Choudhury wrote
> Hello ,
> The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the
> question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat
> and if yes why ? Regards,
>
It depends on the windows version used actually. From what I remember t
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:44, wrote:
> Hello ,
> The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is
> whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why ?
The question _is_ why you use a 32bit OS and JVM with 8 GB RAM. Tomcat
is not limited in memory us
On 29/11/2011 17:47, Sylvain Goulmy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know it is possible to have equivalent functionality to the
> "extended document root" provided by the WebSphere product. This feature
> allows you to define a location outside the webapp to make contribution
> without having to
Hello ,
The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is
whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why ?
Regards,
Subhrajyoti
Mobile: +919830079545
Mail: choudh...@labware.com
Web: www.labware.com
LabWare LIMS Solutions - Results Count
From:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:37, Casper Wandahl Schmidt
wrote:
>
[...]
>>
> Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when running 32bit?
> That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more than 4GB of memory no
> matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know that right?
>
> disclaimer
Den 30-11-2011 09:21, Francis GALIEGUE skrev:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, wrote:
Hi ,
Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat
on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB
memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to T
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, wrote:
> Hi ,
> Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat
> on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB
> memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to Tomcat . I also
> found this thread which re
37 matches
Mail list logo
