On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:25 PM, throwsCode wrote:
> I am predominantly a JSF/Facelets/IceFaces developer but recently I have
> been asked to assist some non-profits which calls for php.
Yeah, that's similar to how I got sucked into doing PHP too :-)
(Fool me once, shame on me yadda yadda...)
>
Hi Hassan:
I am predominantly a JSF/Facelets/IceFaces developer but recently I have
been asked to assist some non-profits which calls for php. I would like to
use my existing development environment which is Eclipse and Tomcat. If I
can discover the secrets to php in Tomcat that would be the be
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:06 PM, throwsCode wrote:
> I'm trying to implement PHP on tomcat 7.0.20
Dear god, why?
I would rather duct-tape rabid weasels inside my shorts than do, well,
anything with PHP again, but if you must -- just use Apache HTTPD.
Seriously.
--
Hassan Schroeder ---
Hi all:
An update I entered the following directly into my browser:
http://localhost:8080/secondDynamicWeb/cgi-bin/echoInfo.php
And got the a 404 Error - Servlet CGI not available.
>From this it appears that the servlet is not available but has been defined
because the URL pattern /cg
Paste the workers.properties file and the mod_jk settings here. Are you
using prefork or mpm in Apache? Have you tuned the apache settings to match
the tomcat number of threads?
Igor
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
Hi all:
I'm trying to implement PHP on tomcat 7.0.20 with no luck. Does anyone know
how I can tell whether the CGIServlet is running?
I uncommented all of the sections indicated in the Tomcat document.
Though I think I am making the right call, I am receiving a 400 error.
CALL made form fil
Never mind...I see the example hard codes the name of the file. Sorry for the
noise.
On 09/02/2011 05:50 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I have a working file upload servlet, with the exception that it calls
the uploaded file "samplefile" instead of using the name of the file. So
if I upload differe
Hi,
I have a working file upload servlet, with the exception that it calls the uploaded file
"samplefile" instead of using the name of the file. So if I upload different
files, they all overwrite each other. Any ideas on how to fix this? I used this
tutorial to get it working:
http://www.s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> from my experience there is no need for apache in your
> setup anyway .
Uh, load-balancing?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 9/1/2011 7:06 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
> So form-based authentication is an obnoxious mutt -- but a mutt
> that everyone seems to have fallen in love with.
>
> This isn't Tomcat's fault, however, and Tomcat is doing the normal
> thing by return
Q. Have you tried running directly against tomcat without apache inbetween?
A. Yes; this resolves the performance bottleneck.
Q. from my experience there is no need for apache in your setup anyway
.
A. :-) The reasons for having apache in front: A) Create a DMZ and protect
Tomcat from being exp
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2011/9/2 Javier Barroso :
>> That mean that I can use channelSocket.maxPort in tomcat 6.0.20 ? I
>> read about an new alias maxport, but I suppose I can use still
>> channelSocket.maxPort.
>
> Only if you are lucky, because it depends whe
Hello Talha,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Talha Fazal wrote:
> PLEASE SEE MY ANSWERS BELOW IN UPPER CAPS.
>
> ONE IMPORTANT OBSERVATION: Even though, tomcat's response time is decent, for
> some reason, apache is taking a lot longer to serve requests. We are using
> mod_jk with Tomcat using
2011/9/2 Javier Barroso :
> That mean that I can use channelSocket.maxPort in tomcat 6.0.20 ? I
> read about an new alias maxport, but I suppose I can use still
> channelSocket.maxPort.
Only if you are lucky, because it depends whether port or maxPort is
set first (in that old version of Tomcat).
PLEASE SEE MY ANSWERS BELOW IN UPPER CAPS.
ONE IMPORTANT OBSERVATION: Even though, tomcat's response time is decent, for
some reason, apache is taking a lot longer to serve requests. We are using
mod_jk with Tomcat using AJP1.3 protocol in the connector setting in
server.xml. We plan to try mod
On 9/2/2011 12:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 02/09/2011 17:01, David kerber wrote:
What would I need to do to change TC 7.0.20 from using a 64-bit JRE to a
32-bit one on a 64-bit windows 2008 machine?
I tried changing the JVM setting in tomcat7w, but the service wouldn't
start. What else do I n
On 02/09/2011 17:01, David kerber wrote:
> What would I need to do to change TC 7.0.20 from using a 64-bit JRE to a
> 32-bit one on a 64-bit windows 2008 machine?
>
> I tried changing the JVM setting in tomcat7w, but the service wouldn't
> start. What else do I need to change?
If you are running
What would I need to do to change TC 7.0.20 from using a 64-bit JRE to a
32-bit one on a 64-bit windows 2008 machine?
I tried changing the JVM setting in tomcat7w, but the service wouldn't
start. What else do I need to change?
D
--
Have you ruled out issues with db connection pooling?
You might consider setting your dbcp maxWait to 8000 or less and watch
for "timeout waiting for idle object" exceptions. Also, you could
monitor database connections/active-users on the DB side to see if your
dbcp pools are max'd but all th
Hello Talha,
well... the quickshots are through.
You should really create some threaddumps after each other (for
example with jstack) and try to find out which thread is slowing the
app down.
For starters you could try with code you changed for tomcat
adaptations if any. The problem seems to lie b
WE GENERATE REPORT ON NETWORK BACKLOG USING ADVANCED TOOLS, WHICH INDICATE
NEGLIGIBLE NETWORK DELAY. AT ONE POINT TO TIME THIS WAS AN ISSUE. WE INCREASED
THE BANDWIDTH FROM 45 MBPS TO 100 MBPS WHICH RESOLVED THE ISSUE.
THANKS, TALHA.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto
Hi Leon,
Please see any answers in CAPS below.
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:06 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
seems that your tomcats are fine.
Question, yo
> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
> We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threads locked.
> "http-8014-9" daemon prio=10 tid=0x60965c00 nid=0x6c83 in
> Object.wait()
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoin
Hello Talha,
seems that your tomcats are fine.
Question, you mention that the tomcat do not perform, but you don't
tell us how you come to this conclusion except for cpu load.
What is the difference in response times between weblogic and tomcat?
Maybe your tomcat just perform the job MUCH faster ;
Thx Charles! We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threads locked.
Please see a short sample below:
"http-8014-9" daemon prio=10 tid=0x60965c00 nid=0x6c83 in Object.wait()
[0x4c688000..0x4c688c90]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
at
Plz. see my answers below in UPPERCAPS.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have t
> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
> Subject: Tomcat Performance Turning.
> In our staging environment for load testing, when we run the load
> test using 525 concurrent users, the app doesn't perform at all.
> The CPU usage (on Apache and Tomcat Servers) hovers between 7% to
> 8%.
On 02/09/2011 14:33, Edward Quick wrote:
> Thanks Mark. The report says this makes (previous versions of) Apache Tomcat
> vulnerable to an authentication bypass and information disclosure, so I'm was
> just trying to understand how the example demonstrates that?
The example shows that Tomcat pr
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have the same 30 max threads
limit in weblogic?
Because sending 525 users through 2x30=60 max threads seems a little
bottlenecky.
Which software are you using to produce the load? Does it keepalive
the connections?
regards
Leon
On Fri, Sep 2,
Thanks Mark. The report says this makes (previous versions of) Apache Tomcat
vulnerable to an authentication bypass and information disclosure, so I'm was
just trying to understand how the example demonstrates that?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: 0
Background:
We have a moderately high traffic web application (between 8 to 21 million
hits/day) running Apache to serve static content (also to load balance and
create a DMZ) and Weblogic to serve dynamic content (Struts 1.1 based Java web
application).
We are trying to replace Weblogic with T
On 02/09/2011 14:12, Edward Quick wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was testing out the packet forgery example (at
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698)
> to see if my site was vulnerable and got the following results.
> I'm not sure looking at the code comments in ForwardRequestForg
Hi there,
I was testing out the packet forgery example (at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698)
to see if my site was vulnerable and got the following results.
I'm not sure looking at the code comments in ForwardRequestForgeryExample.java
if the output below means it's vulner
That mean that I can use channelSocket.maxPort in tomcat 6.0.20 ? I
read about an new alias maxport, but I suppose I can use still
channelSocket.maxPort. Upgrading all tomcats here could be a problem
with applications :(
Thank you very much
Regards
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Mark Thomas w
On 02/09/2011 10:38, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Searching by maxport in google, I found
> http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=119266319507127&w=2 thread, but seems like
> there is not answer to this question :(
>
> Any tip ?
Try reading the 6.0x. changelog.
Mark
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM,
On 02/09/2011 02:37, Chris Burroughs wrote:
> Looking at the Connector configuration options I'm having trouble
> reconciling the description of socket.soLingerOn and connectionLinger [1]
The documentation is a bit of a mess here. I'll explain what should
happen below and try and clean up the docu
Searching by maxport in google, I found
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=119266319507127&w=2 thread, but seems like
there is not answer to this question :(
Any tip ?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Ok, I downloaded tomcat source code and found "maxPort" which I think is
Ok, I downloaded tomcat source code and found "maxPort" which I think is the
parameter I need.
I think this should be documented in
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/ajp.html or in mod_jk from
apache.
Thanks!
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a
Hi,
I have a tomcat 6.0.20 where I have next config in server.xml:
Today I found this is in catalina.out:
12-ago-2011 9:22:32 org.apache.jk.common.
ChannelSocket init
INFO: Port busy 8010 java.net.BindException: Address already in use
12-ago-2011 9:22:32 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
On 02/09/2011 01:21, Chris Burroughs wrote:
> In tomcat 6 Http11NioProtocol defines a socketCloseDelay field. But as
> far as I and grep can tell it is not used anywhere [1]. Is this field
> supposed to be doing something?
Not that I can tell. It looks to be have been present in the NIO
connecto
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.21
Apache Tomcat 7.0.21 includes security fixes, bug fixes and new features
compared to version 7.0.20 including:
- A fix for CVE-2011-3190 that allowed an attacker to inject requests
when Tomcat was configured behind
41 matches
Mail list logo
