I'm trying to track down a character encoding issue that I've been
having, but don't really understand. Hopefully one of you will know what
the answer is.
I am using CKEditor to generate some user-specified HTML. CKEditor
offers an "insert special character" function that often creates named
Answering my own questions.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Andrew Todd wrote:
> So I'm working on a Maven-based project in which I would like to use
> the Tomcat JDBC connection pool. I've noticed that with Tomcat 7, the
> documentation has now moved into the official Tomcat docs
> (https://tom
Jeffrey wrote:
>I do hope you are billing them an arm & a leg for that "better" certificate.
Our client is an integral partner of a well-known certificate provider, so they
are providing it for us without chargefor just their subdomain.
Chuck wrote:
>Since you have only one , the name attri
> port="8443" maxThreads="200"
> scheme="https" secure="true" SSLEnabled="true"
> SSLCertificateFile="/usr/local/tomcat/conf/my.crt"
> SSLCertificateKeyFile="/usr/local/tomcat/conf/my.pem"
> clientAuth="optional" SSLProtocol="TLSv1"/>
>
Things to
Hi David,
You need to not only look at the container but it's configuration and the jre
that is being used. There have been a lot of improvements in all areas for
performance. Also, understand the servlet model seems developers have
completely forgotten about it and how important it is.
Also, I
On 8/31/2011 10:16 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 31/08/2011 15:11, David kerber wrote:
Has there been any comparison testing done in how the latest 7.x version
of TC will compare to the latest 6.0.x version, in the case of tons
(hundreds per second) of very small, quick-to-process requests?
Not th
On 8/31/2011 10:18 AM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 16:11, David kerber wrote:
Has there been any comparison testing done in how the latest 7.x version of
TC will compare to the latest 6.0.x version, in the case of tons (hundreds
per second) of very small, quick-to-process re
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 16:11, David kerber wrote:
> Has there been any comparison testing done in how the latest 7.x version of
> TC will compare to the latest 6.0.x version, in the case of tons (hundreds
> per second) of very small, quick-to-process requests?
>
> I have a machine that's starting
On 31/08/2011 15:11, David kerber wrote:
> Has there been any comparison testing done in how the latest 7.x version
> of TC will compare to the latest 6.0.x version, in the case of tons
> (hundreds per second) of very small, quick-to-process requests?
Not that I am aware of.
> I have a machine th
Has there been any comparison testing done in how the latest 7.x version
of TC will compare to the latest 6.0.x version, in the case of tons
(hundreds per second) of very small, quick-to-process requests?
I have a machine that's starting to croak and am moving to a new
machine, and need to dec
I do hope you are billing them an arm & a leg for that "better" certificate.
Our setup is near identical to yours, and it is what we would do.
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Johnson [mailto:gre...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 10:10 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subjec
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: [Solved] Two SSL certs. for same web app
> Since you have only one , the name attribute is irrelevant
> as long as it matches the defaultHost setting in the .
Should also note that the standard value of "localhost" for the defaultHost
attribute is so
> From: Greg Johnson [mailto:gre...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: [Solved] Two SSL certs. for same web app
> I did end up needing to slightly change the Host and Engine
> declarations to point to 'ip-address-one' in my example.
That change isn't necessary.
>
Since you have only one , the name at
On 31/08/2011 07:54, Neil Laurance wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are using:
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga)
>
> Tomcat 6.0.29
>
> We appear to be having a similar issue to:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-270
>
> Except our stacktrace line-numbers are diff
On 31/08/2011 11:48, Pid wrote:
> On 31/08/2011 08:24, Greg Johnson wrote:
>> No, and you don't need to make any changes other than adding the extra
>> . Traffic from both s will be routed to the single
>> and .
>>> Thanks for the advice, Chuck. I did end up needing to slightly change the
>>>
On 31/08/2011 08:24, Greg Johnson wrote:
> No, and you don't need to make any changes other than adding the extra
> . Traffic from both s will be routed to the single
> and .
>> Thanks for the advice, Chuck. I did end up needing to slightly change the
>> Host and Engine declarations to point t
2011/8/31 Neil Laurance :
> Hi there,
>
> We are using:
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga)
>
> Tomcat 6.0.29
>
> (...)
>
> Is there any easy of confirming the version of dbcp we have? I exploded
> tomcat-dbcp.jar and took a look, and nothing obvious ?
apache-tomcat-6.0.x-sr
No, and you don't need to make any changes other than adding the extra
. Traffic from both s will be routed to the single
and .
>Thanks for the advice, Chuck. I did end up needing to slightly change the Host
>and Engine declarations to point to 'ip-address-one' in my example. So my
>server.xm
18 matches
Mail list logo
