On 6/20/2011 5:05 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 6/20/2011 5:47 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
On 6/20/2011 4:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Maybe you could move /some/ of them?
The libraries in question are actually loaded by the application
- Original Message -
> From: Dennis de Champeaux
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Cc: dennis
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 12:58 PM
> Subject: Tomcat6/7 virtual hosting - yet again
>
>T his is my 4th day trying to setup virtual hosting on Linux-Debian;
> even trying Tomcat6 after failing
Good point Chuck. I agree with you, the webapp wouldn't be all secured. But
there are 2 different things here:
* the issue with the plain password
* the issue with session hijacking
The first one first gives the hacker a private information about the user
(which can even the used by the user some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 6/20/2011 5:47 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 6/20/2011 4:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>> Maybe you could move /some/ of them?
>
> The libraries in question are actually loaded by the application
> classloader -- as is Tomcat's Bootstrap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edwin,
On 6/20/2011 5:01 PM, Edwin Eversdijk wrote:
> When I send a 304 response status, i send also the lastmodified header. It
> shows
> on tomcat directly via 8080. But via mod_jk/apache http server it's
> missing...
I see the same behavior wi
> From: Rafael Liu [mailto:rafael...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Setting SSL for login pages
> I think it would be natural something like this:
>
>
> SSL login
> /login/*
>
>
> CONFIDENTIAL
>
>
The login pages are usually not specified in the ; only the pages
to be protecte
On 6/20/2011 4:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 6/20/2011 3:41 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
On 6/20/2011 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It should have improved for the majority of use cases in 7.0.14 but at
the price of making it worse for JARs in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 6/20/2011 3:41 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 6/20/2011 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> It should have improved for the majority of use cases in 7.0.14 but at
>> the price of making it worse for JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/lib.
>> 7.0.16 should h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jocelyn,
On 6/20/2011 4:11 PM, Jocelyn Ireson-Paine wrote:
> I do put a reference to
> the response into an instance, in order that I can give my main
> processing method all the data it needs (including the response) as one
> single parameter. But I'
So guy,
I want the user to be redirected to HTTPS once he hits an authenticated
page. So I think it would be natural something like this:
SSL login
/login/*
CONFIDENTIAL
FORM
MyRealm
/login/login.jsp
/login/error.jsp
The problem is the FormAuthentic
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Dennis de Champeaux
wrote:
> Let add that Tomcat was responding on port 8080 with out of the box
> server.xml.
So you pretty obviously need to continue to use port 8080, eh?
e.g. http://www.testzzz.com:8080/
or turn off the Apache httpd running on port 80 and
> From: Dennis de Champeaux [mailto:atlantisic...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat6/7 virtual hosting - yet again
> Let add that Tomcat was responding on port 8080 with out
> of the box server.xml.
As expected. What makes you think it will magically respond on port 80?
(Especially since you
Let add that Tomcat was responding on port 8080 with out of the box server.xml.
Home page: rs6.risingnet.net/~ddcc
Health Info Anytime for Everyone: www.HealthCheck4Me.info
Exerc
Hi,
When I send a 304 response status, i send also the lastmodified header. It
shows
on tomcat directly via 8080. But via mod_jk/apache http server it's missing...
Is this correct behaviour or some bug? Example url:
http://www.rsscockpit.com/sitemap.do?action=subject&subjectid=52&language=nl
TX, for the quick response:
>Uh, "unexpected" because that's obviously not a Tomcat server at all
>that you're accessing, or something else? :-)
And what would be the fix ?
Home
On 6/20/2011 3:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Sure we want to make scaning as fast as possible. But did you realize,
that you can exclude Jars from being scanned? There's a list f
exclusions defined in catalina.properties.
Yes -- and I'll go there is the speed from 7.0.12 (which was quite
reasonable
On 6/20/2011 2:41 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
On 6/20/2011 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It should have improved for the majority of use cases in 7.0.14 but at
the price of making it worse for JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/lib.
7.0.16 should have returned scanning of JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/lib
to t
On 20.06.2011 21:41, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 6/20/2011 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> It should have improved for the majority of use cases in 7.0.14 but at
>> the price of making it worse for JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/lib.
>> 7.0.16 should have returned scanning of JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/l
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Dennis de Champeaux
wrote:
> This is my 4th day trying to setup virtual hosting on Linux-Debian;
> Yes I have read everything that I can find in Tomcat documentation -
> Using a browser (on that box) to access that bogus domain
> www.testzzz.com "works" but give
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jocelyn,
On 6/15/2011 1:43 PM, Jocelyn Ireson-Paine wrote:
ResponseHolder rh = (ResponseHolder)this_session.getAttribute(
"response_holder" );
Here is the beginning of your errors.
By savin
This is my 4th day trying to setup virtual hosting on Linux-Debian;
even trying Tomcat6 after failing on Tomcat7.
Yes I have read everything that I can find in Tomcat documentation -
including the obtuse:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/virtual-hosting-howto.html
what I found on this fo
On 6/20/2011 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It should have improved for the majority of use cases in 7.0.14 but at
the price of making it worse for JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/lib.
7.0.16 should have returned scanning of JARs in CATALINA_[HOME_BASE]/lib
to the pre 7.0.14 performance levels.
We're e
On 20/06/2011 20:12, Jess Holle wrote:
> Start up takes around 20 seconds longer with Tomcat 7.0.14 and 7.0.16
> than it did with 7.0.12.
>
> This appears to be due to time spent scanning jars for annotations,
> etc. We have a number of /very /large jar files in both the base
> classloader for To
Start up takes around 20 seconds longer with Tomcat 7.0.14 and 7.0.16
than it did with 7.0.12.
This appears to be due to time spent scanning jars for annotations,
etc. We have a number of /very /large jar files in both the base
classloader for Tomcat (which we're embedding) and in our web app
Hi
My Clustering Fails :
SEVERE: Unable to send replicated message to member
[org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastMember[t
cp://172.28.9.109:4001,catalina,172.28.9.109,4001, alive=1813]], has only
senders for []
Jun 20, 2011 1:52:57 PM org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationTransmitter
Ranier,
I've now demonstrated that this is not about 'deferred launch' but
rather about an old servlet failing to be configured with the embedded
Tomcat class.
https://github.com/bimargulies/Tomcat-Solr-Test-Case
has been simplified. It makes the few required calls to set up the
Tomcat object. T
Ranier,
I don't have a problem executing jsps. I have a problem configuring a
webapp with entire servlets defined by jsps. My code works perfectly
fine launching another webapp with jsps in it which are not declared
in elements.
--benson
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
Hi, I set up a testcase at
https://github.com/bimargulies/Tomcat-Solr-Test-Case. Note that this
is NOT a 3.0 webapp. I read the code, and the failing path is in the
if statement for 'pre-3.0'. Please have a look at the single Java
class in there and tell me what is wrong, since it seems quite
strai
On 20.06.2011 18:35, János Löbb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To take a tomcat instance out from a cluster, now I have a no-cluster.xml and
> in content it is exactly the same as the server.xml, except the
>
> tag is commented out.
>
> The question is should I also take out the jvmRoute="tc24x" variable f
Hi Benson,
On 20.06.2011 17:51, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Reading org.apache.catalina.startup.Tomcat.addWebapp(Host, String,
> String, String), I don't understand the following:
>
> // prevent it from looking ( if it finds one - it'll have dup error )
> ctxCfg.setDefaultWebXml("or
Hi,
To take a tomcat instance out from a cluster, now I have a no-cluster.xml and
in content it is exactly the same as the server.xml, except the
tag is commented out.
The question is should I also take out the jvmRoute="tc24x" variable from the
tag or leave it there. My workers.properties
Hi
Cluster did start , but I am getting exception :
INFO: membership mbean registered
(Catalina:type=ClusterMembership,host=localhost)
Jun 20, 2011 11:44:31 AM org.apache.catalina.cluster.deploy.FarmWarDeployer
start
INFO: Cluster FarmWarDeployer started.
Exception in thread "Cluster-Membership
This is related to another thread I started, but it's a different question.
Some experimentation shows that Tomcat.java disables the default
web.xml for a good reason; if I force one back into place, I get a
duplicate name error.
However, whatever it ends up using does not include a servlet named
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Calum,
On 6/20/2011 6:12 AM, Calum wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 18:54, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> The request and response objects must never be accessed outside the
>> request processing cycle. The objects are recycled and cleared or
>> reused for su
Reading org.apache.catalina.startup.Tomcat.addWebapp(Host, String,
String, String), I don't understand the following:
// prevent it from looking ( if it finds one - it'll have dup error )
ctxCfg.setDefaultWebXml("org/apache/catalin/startup/NO_DEFAULT_XML");
Why is this being used
I'm using import org.apache.catalina.startup.Tomcat to embed tomcat.
After it is running, I'm trying to add another webapp with .addWebapp.
The addWebapp call logs:
2011-06-20 11:23:23,385 ["http-bio-9167"-exec-2] INFO
org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase - The start() method was called
on com
> 1. What exact version of Tomcat 5.5.x you are using?
5.5.17.0
> 2. It says that it is class loading issue. What jars to you have on
> the server ind in your webapp?
there are a lot of jars i used for this webapp, including spring, dwr,
log4j, mail, esapi, jstl, json, common, activation, .
>
2011/6/20 WEIQUAN YUAN :
> I can run without problem locally for app testPhoenix in eclipse
> server, but when deploy to linux box, I got error like below
>
>
> 20-Jun-2011 9:19:24 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
> SEVERE: Error listenerStart
> 20-Jun-2011 9:19:24 AM org.apache.ca
I can run without problem locally for app testPhoenix in eclipse
server, but when deploy to linux box, I got error like below
20-Jun-2011 9:19:24 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
20-Jun-2011 9:19:24 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEV
On 15 June 2011 18:54, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> The request and response objects must never be accessed outside the
> request processing cycle. The objects are recycled and cleared or
> reused for subsequent request and responses, and are not guaranteed to
> be thread-safe. The consequences c
40 matches
Mail list logo
