denis.laro...@pwc.ca wrote:
Hello everybody,
I wrote a Struts application deployed on a Tomcat server that is used as a
web service. What I see is that for every request sent by the client
applications a new session is created; I guess this is because there's no
JSESSIONID cookie sent with th
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: [OT] OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
> This error occurred /once/ at 16:39 EDT and it's 17:39 EDT now
> Is it likely that this was something acute and that my server is okay?
> PS Old Generation
>capac
Your "old" is full. Either a memory leak or you simply need more (and
old gen of 128Mb is virtually nothing). Increase :-)
regards
Leon
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All,
>
> This is not Tomcat-related but I fig
> From: denis.laro...@pwc.ca [mailto:denis.laro...@pwc.ca]
> Subject: Struts application used as a web service (large number of sessions)
> I wrote a Struts application deployed on a Tomcat server
> that is used as a web service.
Exact Tomcat version?
> I guess this is because there's no JSESS
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Thomas Andraschko
wrote:
> Yep sorry, it's my ticket :D
Ok, good that there was only one issue ;-)
> It was a 2 minute action, sorry for the bad explanation :)
> If you need further details, send me a email or add a comment to the issue.
No prob, I could reproduce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
This is not Tomcat-related but I figured I'd ask as there are some smart
folks here who might be able to give me some good information.
As the title suggests, I have suffered an OOME in production with the
message "GC overhead limit exceeded". A
Hello everybody,
I wrote a Struts application deployed on a Tomcat server that is used as a
web service. What I see is that for every request sent by the client
applications a new session is created; I guess this is because there's no
JSESSIONID cookie sent with the request. Could someone tell
> From: afk...@gmail.com [mailto:afk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Afkham Azeez
> Subject: Tomcat 7 - does unpackWars=false work
> In my server.xml file, I have set unpackWars to false as follows:
> unpackWARs="false" autoDeploy="true">
> However, my WAR files are still being unpacked in
Hi folks,
In my server.xml file, I have set unpackWars to false as follows:
However, my WAR files are still being unpacked into the work directory. Am I
missing something?
Thanks
Azeez
I figured this out.
I was not hitting a JSP page, so the session variable wasn't getting
refreshed.
It's always the little things that throw us off!
-Jordan
On 02/15/2011 10:07 AM, Jordan Michaels wrote:
Hello mod_jk Experts,
I'm having trouble getting sticky sessions to work as expected
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> On the other hand, it's very difficult for a container to determine what
> the definition of "changed" is. For instance, an object may return a
> different value for a method call depending on the current date and
> time, yet the intern
Yep sorry, it's my ticket :D
It was a 2 minute action, sorry for the bad explanation :)
If you need further details, send me a email or add a comment to the issue.
--- Martin Grotzke schrieb am Di, 15.2.2011:
> Von: Martin Grotzke
> Betreff: Re: Replicate session-object after values in object
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Thomas Andraschko
wrote:
> Hmm not really but the tcp cluster with BackupManager would be enough (if it
> would check for modification).
Not sure about BackupManager, but perhaps it's possible to add this
specific behaviour.
>
> The memcached manager is really a
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Martin Grotzke
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Thomas Andraschko
> wrote:
>> Thanks! i will give it a try!
>> Is there also another manager available without using memcached?
> None that I'm aware of, but perhaps google will know more ;-)
I forgot terra
Hmm not really but the tcp cluster with BackupManager would be enough (if it
would check for modification).
The memcached manager is really a great idea and works great! I have only one
issue. If you shutdown a memcached node, JSF pages can not be accessed anymore
(a blank page will appear) and
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Thomas Andraschko
wrote:
> Thanks! i will give it a try!
> Is there also another manager available without using memcached?
None that I'm aware of, but perhaps google will know more ;-)
What do you have in mind btw? Is it especially memcached that you
would like
On 2/15/11 2:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/14/2011 5:39 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
>>>
>>> http://www.myuniportal.com/tomcatjerseyservletprofile.jpg
>
>> W
Hello mod_jk Experts,
I'm having trouble getting sticky sessions to work as expected.
I believe I've identified the problem in the logs:
---
[Mon Feb 14 15:28:02.333 2011] [4774:4041131776] [debug]
get_most_suitable_worker::jk_lb_worker.c (942): searching worker for
partial sessionid A
On 15/02/2011 17:18, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> One more question: Why isn't the Tomcat class used in the mainstream code
> and is only used in the test cases? In Tomcat 5.x and 6.x IIRC, Catalina
> used to extend Embedded.
Because Tomcat provides simplified startup that isn't sophisticated
enough for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jie tang,
On 2/14/2011 4:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/02/2011 05:38, jie tang wrote:
>> I place a directory in Tomcat webapps directory. I want to Tomcat list files
>> under the directory.
>> When I browse the file list in my browser, the file li
One more question: Why isn't the Tomcat class used in the mainstream code
and is only used in the test cases? In Tomcat 5.x and 6.x IIRC, Catalina
used to extend Embedded.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15/02/2011 14:07, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at
On 14/02/2011 19:46, Sean Killeen wrote:
> It doesn't -- it tells me that a certificate already exists with that alias,
> and the import fails.
Hmm. Did you re-use the same private key for this updated certificate?
If that is the case then I think you can fix this with some java code
but it looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 2/14/2011 2:44 PM, Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> Does other Servlet containers support this kind of replication or is
> it really the only way to put/remove the object to/from the session
> map?
I've been browsing the servlet spec and I can't
On 15/02/2011 14:07, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
> chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
>
>>> From: Afkham Azeez [mailto:afk...@gmail.com]
>>> Subject: Embedding Tomcat 7
>>
>>> We need our webapps to be visible through
>>> multiple connectors. How c
On 14/02/2011 19:44, Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> Does other Servlet containers support this kind of replication or is it
> really the only way to put/remove the object to/from the session map?
Don't know. It is very likely to be container dependent.
> It is possible to develop a valve or intercept
Thanks for everyone's help.
Rob Johnson MBA/IT
IT Specialist
ONRR
303-231-3963
303-589-9278 (Cell)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 9:32 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 Memory Heap Limit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean,
On 2/15/2011 7:37 AM, Sean Killeen wrote:
> leaving the old intermediate CA & old certificate, I added the new
> intermediate CAs and the new certificate with an alias of "tomcat2". I added
> 'keyAlias="tomcat2"' to my connector to specify the n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mladen,
On 2/15/2011 8:51 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/15/2011 01:08 PM, Yu Kikuchi wrote:
>> Mr.Warnier
>>
>> Thank you for your advice.
>>
>> But I want to know not the way to inhibit these logs but the reason
>> why these logs output.
>>
>
> Bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Afkam,
On 2/15/2011 3:54 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Is there any documentation available on embedding Tomcat 7? We were using
> Tomcat 5.5.23 but the Embedded class has been deprecated. The Tomcat class
> is the alternative, but it seems th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob,
On 2/15/2011 11:12 AM, Johnson, Rob E wrote:
> That was my next question, should I switch to Linux.
This depends entirely on your own requirements. For example, if your
organization runs all Microsoft, then switching to Linux is probably a
mista
On 2/15/2011 11:15 AM, Johnson, Rob E wrote:
Thanks,
I have one instance of Tomcat running for a single app. Is is possible
to create additional instances of tomcat, then cluster or load balance
the instances, to help my user performance?
That's going to depend entirely on the app, and what yo
On 2/15/2011 11:03 AM, Johnson, Rob E wrote:
If I move to the 64 bit how high can I push the size?
Higher than you can count (actually, whatever the OS and hardware will
support). Microsoft's list:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
---
Thanks,
I have one instance of Tomcat running for a single app. Is is possible
to create additional instances of tomcat, then cluster or load balance
the instances, to help my user performance?
Rob Johnson MBA/IT
IT Specialist
ONRR
303-231-3963
303-589-9278 (Cell)
-Original Message-
Thanks,
That was my next question, should I switch to Linux.
This server is used only as web application server. I want to give the end
users, people logging into the web based app, the best performance. Currently
the system gets very slow with more than 10 users on at a time.
I'm hoping to
On 2/15/2011 10:57 AM, Johnson, Rob E wrote:
It is a stand alone 32 bit server
The most a 32-bit OS can give to any process is ~3GB, and anything over
2GB requires changing some boot settings. But you'll be able to run a
bunch of tomcat instances, all with 2 or 3GB, with that much physical R
That depends...
On linux I was able to assign a single process >30Gb, never tried more.
I think your OS is your single limit.
regards
Leon
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Johnson, Rob E wrote:
> If I move to the 64 bit how high can I push the size?
>
>
>
>
> Rob Johnson MBA/IT
> IT Specialist
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 10:01 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 6 Memory Heap Limit
>
> > From: Johnson, Rob E [mailto:rob.john...@onrr.gov]
> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6 Memory He
If I move to the 64 bit how high can I push the size?
Rob Johnson MBA/IT
IT Specialist
ONRR
303-231-3963
303-589-9278 (Cell)
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 9:01 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE:
> From: Johnson, Rob E [mailto:rob.john...@onrr.gov]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 6 Memory Heap Limit
> It is a stand alone 32 bit server
Then you're stuck. To get large heap sizes, you'll need a 64-bit OS and a
64-bit JVM.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROP
It is a stand alone 32 bit server
Rob Johnson MBA/IT
IT Specialist
ONRR
303-231-3963
303-589-9278 (Cell)
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 8:55 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 Memory Heap Limit
Win
Windows Server 2003 <- is this a 32 bit OS?
And if not, are you using 64 bit java vm?
regards
Leon
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Johnson, Rob E wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Apache Tomcat 6.0.20
> Windows Server 2003
> 50G RAM
> I'm running Apache Tomcat 6.0 as a service on a Windows 2003 Server with
> 50
Hi,
Apache Tomcat 6.0.20
Windows Server 2003
50G RAM
I'm running Apache Tomcat 6.0 as a service on a Windows 2003 Server with
50G of RAM. I want to fully utilize the 50G of RAM (40G) but I cannot
get the Apache Service to start again if I go any higher than the
setting listed below:
-Xms1024m -Xmx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 2/14/2011 5:39 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
>>
>> http://www.myuniportal.com/tomcatjerseyservletprofile.jpg
>
> What are we lo
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Afkham Azeez [mailto:afk...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Embedding Tomcat 7
>
> > We need our webapps to be visible through
> > multiple connectors. How can this be done?
>
> Connectors belong to the Se
> Because Tomcat closes its part of the connection.
When apache start running, what do you see the case that the Tomcat closes the
connection?
> Apache httpd configuration directives like JkLogLevel and other Jkx
directives, tell mod_jk what you want it to do.
> By using "JkLogLevel info"
On 02/15/2011 01:08 PM, Yu Kikuchi wrote:
Mr.Warnier
Thank you for your advice.
But I want to know not the way to inhibit these logs but the reason why these
logs output.
Because Tomcat closes its part of the connection.
Regards
--
^TM
Hi.
I am not quite sure that I understand your question.
:-)
Let me try another answer :
mod_jk is a software module which allows a front-end Apache httpd server to forward
requests to a back-end Tomcat server (and in the opposite direction pass the responses of
Tomcat back to Apache httpd).
> From: Afkham Azeez [mailto:afk...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Embedding Tomcat 7
> We need our webapps to be visible through
> multiple connectors. How can this be done?
Connectors belong to the Service, so you can attach new ones with this:
Tomcat.getService().addConnector()
- Chuck
THIS CO
> From: Luca Gervasi [mailto:tom...@ashetic.net]
> Subject: Hanged threads
> The Thread dump reveals many threads hanged with:
>java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING on
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker@b446f9 at
> java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at
> java.lang.Ob
Hi Sal,
Thanks for the response. I believe there was a bug or issue which caused us
to use TLSv1 instead of just "TLS" for the setting. At any rate, this
setting has not been an issue in the past, and I can verify that it
strictly enforces TLS (which is our requirement -- we don't want it to be
a
Mr.Warnier
Thank you for your advice.
But I want to know not the way to inhibit these logs but the reason why these
logs output.
Any comments are welcome.
Best regard,
(2011/02/15 19:54), André Warnier wrote:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/printer/apache.html
Look at JkL
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/printer/apache.html
Look at JkLogLevel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hello,
Server version: Apache Tomcat/6.0.26
Server built: March 9 2010 1805
Server number: 6.0.26.0
OS Name:Linux
OS Version: 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE
Architecture: i386
JVM Version:1.5.0_16-b02
JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
yesterday i ran a connection test over the htt
Thanks! i will give it a try!
Is there also another manager available without using memcached?
--- Martin Grotzke schrieb am Di, 15.2.2011:
> Von: Martin Grotzke
> Betreff: Re: Replicate session-object after values in object has been changed
> An: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Datum: Dienstag, 15
Hi folks,
Is there any documentation available on embedding Tomcat 7? We were using
Tomcat 5.5.23 but the Embedded class has been deprecated. The Tomcat class
is the alternative, but it seems that a single Tomcat instance can only
handle a single connector. We need our webapps to be visible through
55 matches
Mail list logo
