> From: rujin raj [mailto:rujin...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Connector Setting Problem in tomcat 6.0.29
> I added the attributes in connector executer. even though
> it is not working
> Executer setting:
> port="8080" protocol="HTTP/1.1"
>minSpareThreads="50"
>
I added the attributes in connector executer. even though it is not working
Executer setting:
I need to specify both miSpareThreads and maxSparethreads
Please help
--rujinraj
On 3 November 2010 14:32, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 02.11.2010 14:20, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: rujin raj
Forget about my math question.
Obviously, connection_pool_size of 15, would mean there are 60 (4 tomcats)
in total per server process.
Then the math works out
Sorry, it's 1:08am over here :-)
2010/11/5 Marc Wilmots
> Honestlyno, I didn't.
> The mod_jk scared the hell out of mewouldn
Honestlyno, I didn't.
The mod_jk scared the hell out of mewouldn't you? :-)
"Using this option will have a strong performance penalty for Apache and
Tomcat. Use this only as a last resort in case of unfixable network
problems."
I'll give it a try tomorrow and see what it gives.
By the wa
On 04/11/2010 19:27, Marc Wilmots wrote:
> The best solution would be to enable DisableReuse as Mark stated, although
> I'm afraid that would be too big of a performance hit.
Have you tried it?
The cost of the required CPING/CPONG isn't that different to the cost of
creating a TCP/IP connection.
I just got my own question answered whether connection_pool_size sets a pool
per server process.
"This defines the number of connections made to the AJP backend that are
maintained as a connection pool. It will limit the number of those
connection that each web server child process can made."
Thi
Rainer, that's very true.
So I am wondering...If 1200 > 200 (Tomcat maxThreads), then what would be
the right way to solve this? Imagine that 2 Tomcats would crash, that would
leave me with 1200 > 400. I can't just raise the maxThreads to 600 for each
Tomcat, as that would probably perform even wor
2010/11/5 Nagulapalli, Srinivas :
> Many thanks for the tip. Didn't realize how much context file changed.
> Changed context.xml like below and it deploys fine now in 6.0.20.
> Going to check and test more. Please tell if I am missing out on limb still.
>
> Changed contents of MYPROJECT.xml that d
Many thanks for the tip. Didn't realize how much context file changed. Changed
context.xml like below and it deploys fine now in 6.0.20.
Going to check and test more. Please tell if I am missing out on limb still.
Changed contents of MYPROJECT.xml that deploys fine:
=
2010/11/4 Nagulapalli, Srinivas :
> Forgot to put contents of application's context.xml. Still no difference
> in contents between 6.0.18 and 6.0.20- same file listed under
> %TOMCAT_HOME%\conf\Catalina\localhost\MYPROJECT.xml for both versions
>
A lot is wrong with your context file. Please read
Forgot to put contents of application's context.xml. Still no difference
in contents between 6.0.18 and 6.0.20- same file listed under
%TOMCAT_HOME%\conf\Catalina\localhost\MYPROJECT.xml for both versions
Contents of MYPROJECT.XML :
No difference in context.xml file for Tomcat-6.0.18 and 6.0.20-both have
following:
WEB-INF/web.xml
Thanks for any pointers.
-Srini
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 4:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Differen
On 04/11/2010 16:35, Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote:
> Nov 4, 2010 4:28:05 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployWAR
> SEVERE: Error deploying configuration descriptor MYPROJECT.war
And the contexts of your context.xml file is what?
Mark
-
I am stumped. I see in Catalina.log only the cryptic error message like
below. No error in localhost.log file.Don't know what I might be
missing.
What is baffling is, same application gets deployed fine in Tomcat
6.0.18 and earlier.
Thanks for any pointers.
-Srini
Contents of Catalina.log:
Nov 4
Interesting.
I'll have to try something similar for my situation.
What I'm trying to do is a bit of the reverse. I want
hostname:80/tomcat-host/manager to end up at (tomcat-host) /manager for four
different tomcat hosts. The forward stuff works fine, but the URLs coming back
all drop the tomca
In looking at the JSPs, the dev team is coding all the paths inside a
construct, which is why the context string is getting prepended
to every path in the document. What was throwing me off a bit was the
default doc was just a redirect as:
--
<%
That's what I'm doing now Pid.
Not sure if that's helping much since it seemed to work the other way
round also. Switching the order still showed the same apparent
behavior.
See my response to Mark Eggers about how I've got it working right now.
I'd love to get any more input from you if there is
>From the RUNNING.txt you will need tomcat-juli.jar in $CATALINA_BASE/bin.
That being said, I start up and shut down 4 Tomcat instances when I'm working
on
cluster issues. Here's a typical directory structure I use for each Tomcat
that's a part of the cluster:
deimos-host/
├── bin
│ ├── sete
On 04/11/2010 14:52, Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote:
> I appreciate any insights/pointers or help.
Look at the logs.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@
I can deploy an old Java web application to Tomcat 6.0.18 using (Java
JDK 1.5.0.22) fine.
However, get error deploying same application to Tomcat 6.0.20. Cannot
deploy to any Tomcat later either, like
all Tomcat 6.0.24, 6.0.26, 6.0.28 and 6.0.29 versions give me same error
message:
"Error deploy
On 04/11/2010 14:56, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> p.s. Don't send me to the Tomcat & Apache docs, I've read them.
What happens if you define the balancer before you try to use it?
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2010/11/4 Ari King :
> > |-- conf
> > |-- server.xml
> > |-- web.xml
>
> Those two files are not sufficient.
>
> Note, that the conf folder is read only from the second instance.
> (The files in CATALINA_HOME\conf are never read).
On 04/11/2010 05:50, mike houston wrote:
> Hi..
>
> Is there a framework for implementing database connection pooling in tomcat
> 6?
> I am migrating my application from tomcat 4 to 6. There is already a
> connection pooling implemented for the sql2000 server using the MS pool.exe
> framework. But
On 04/11/2010 16:06, Will Sumekar wrote:
> AFAIK if you dont specify contextConfigLocation system looks for default
> filename applicationContext.xml at default location of ./WEB-INF/. But it
> doesnt matter cos even if I put context-param the error still comes.
>
> So far it looks like the error
Thank you so much Konstantin for pointing to these specs!
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: filter order question
2010/11/4 Aggarwal, Ajay :
> From reading the doc, it
On 11/4/2010 12:56 PM, Ari King wrote:
Hi all,
My secondary instance of Tomcat 6 does not process requests -- it simply
times out for everything. The only log is catalina.out and there are not
errors in it. Anyone know what could be wrong? I'm using Tomcat 6, Java
1.6.0_20, on Centos 5.5 Final.
2010/11/4 Ari King :
> |-- conf
> |-- server.xml
> |-- web.xml
Those two files are not sufficient.
Note, that the conf folder is read only from the second instance.
(The files in CATALINA_HOME\conf are never read).
-
To
At the risk of violating your request (not to point you to the documentation),
I'm going to point you at the documentation.
In particular: manual/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreverse (from the Apache
httpd
docs)
This will rewrite response URLs. However, there is a caveat. It will not
rewrite
Hi all,
My secondary instance of Tomcat 6 does not process requests -- it simply
times out for everything. The only log is catalina.out and there are not
errors in it. Anyone know what could be wrong? I'm using Tomcat 6, Java
1.6.0_20, on Centos 5.5 Final.
I've set the secondary instance to use p
And here is whole response I receive, if I run into that error:
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:26:36 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Type: text/html
http://www.w3c.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd";>
...deleted some Comments and style infor
2010/11/4 Aggarwal, Ajay :
> From reading the doc, it seems the filters are invoked in the order in
> which they appear in filter-mapping in web.xml. However I have a
> situation where I have 2 filters one mapped using and
> other one mapped using and they are not being invoked in
> the right ord
What was the URL of your request?
> -Original Message-
> From: Aggarwal, Ajay [mailto:ajay.aggar...@stratus.com]
> Sent: 04 November 2010 16:09
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: filter order question
>
> From reading the doc, it seems the filters are invoked in the order in
> which they
>From reading the doc, it seems the filters are invoked in the order in
which they appear in filter-mapping in web.xml. However I have a
situation where I have 2 filters one mapped using and
other one mapped using and they are not being invoked in
the right order.
Below is how my filter mappi
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:37:25 -0500, "Propes, Barry L "
wrote:
Not sure if it matters or not, but in your SponserSummaryDAO
method, it appears you establish the rs as null, but don't ever close
it? You might specifically try that.
And is it necessary to reassign all those variables (connectio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sasidhar,
On 11/4/2010 8:34 AM, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything closed
> fine.
> Then why it is showing like this
>
> DBCP object created 2010-11-04 11:07:59 by the following code was n
Not sure if it matters or not, but in your SponserSummaryDAO method, it
appears you establish the rs as null, but don't ever close it? You might
specifically try that.
And is it necessary to reassign all those variables (connection, rs, pstmt) to
null again in those catch blocks?
-Origi
AFAIK if you dont specify contextConfigLocation system looks for default
filename applicationContext.xml at default location of ./WEB-INF/. But it
doesnt matter cos even if I put context-param the error still comes.
So far it looks like the error is caused by . Once I remove it,
it's OK. Which is
I've googled and not found anything very helpful, particularly nothing
recent.
I am trying to set up AJP load balancing using Apache 2.2.17 to Tomcat
6.0.29.
I'd like to route root to the Tomcat named context (not root). From the
docs I've read so far, I should be able to, but all the referen
Are you sure it is running against the code you think it is running
against. Try changing something that is output to the log files and make
sure you see this change before the abandoned stack trace is thrown.
> -Original Message-
> From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything closed
fine.
Then why it is showing like this
DBCP object created 2010-11-04 11:07:59 by the following code was never
closed:
java.lang.Exception
at
org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:160
The full class looks ok to me. Your issues must be elsewhere.
> -Original Message-
> From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 November 2010 12:05
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to understand the leak
>
> The complete class
2010/11/4 Will Sumekar :
>
>
> org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener
>
>
AFAIK, you have to specify contextConfigLocation context parameter
with location of your application context xml file.
BTW, the log that you cited looks like generated by Log4j. That is not
the default conf
The complete class has only two methods. And class is
import connection.ConnectionUtil;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.Calendar;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import org.apache.commons.logging
The code you posted looks fine but without the complete class it is hard
to say 100% your class is fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 November 2010 11:36
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to u
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
> > connection established and did not close it.
> >>Yes.
>
The code I posted above is clean and properly closed all of
resources.
Is t
On 4 November 2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > I have one doubt.
> You have a question not a doubt
>
> I see this on many forums, and have come to realise it's associated with
speakers of at least one of the widely-used languages in India. I've
On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> Yes it is.
>
> I have one doubt.
You have a question not a doubt and you have more than one of them.
> Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
> connection established and did not close it.
Yes.
> Is remove abandoned, will close the con
Yes it is.
I have one doubt. Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
connection established and did not close it.
Is remove abandoned, will close the connection after time out and places it
back to pool. Is it really closes the connection?
for example I configured pool with 200 connec
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:20:48 +0530, sasidhar prabhakar
wrote:
We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
Looks fine. Does the problem occur everytime?
--
Mikolaj Rydzewski
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@to
We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
This is the code
public String getCountryName(long ipSum){
String name = null;
Connection connection = null;
PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try{
connection = dataSource.getConne
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:08:07 +0530, sasidhar prabhakar
wrote:
I didn't understand below, in DAO class everything fine.
Connection,PreparedStatement,ResultSet are all declared method local,
and
closed properly.
Within finally clause?
Please guide me to solve the problem.
Please show us
51 matches
Mail list logo
